Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:34 pm

blue_c wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:came here to root for JustE

No love bro?

my bad bro. GL too!! (You gotta post in c/o threads more; I keep forgetting about you outside of the off-topics)

PKozi
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby PKozi » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:37 pm

lndixon wrote:Omgggggg UR 2/10!!!!!!!! aghhhhh i'm going crazy over here!!! *rips out hair*

Same here. Did people in the last round of decisions get a new UR the day of calls. And if so, did it have any correlation to what the decision was?

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Mal Reynolds » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:57 pm

4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.

User avatar
franklyscarlet
Posts: 2914
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby franklyscarlet » Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:58 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.


Blerg. Still 2/8 here, and I feel the cloud of rejection hovering.

User avatar
JustE
Posts: 1330
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JustE » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:02 pm

franklyscarlet wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.


Blerg. Still 2/8 here, and I feel the cloud of rejection hovering.


Don't say that... we're the admits... :lol:

User avatar
blue_c
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:06 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby blue_c » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:02 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:my bad bro. GL too!! (You gotta post in c/o threads more; I keep forgetting about you outside of the off-topics)

I avoid on-topics due to lack of anything on-topic to say.

User avatar
franklyscarlet
Posts: 2914
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby franklyscarlet » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:03 pm

JustE wrote:
franklyscarlet wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.


Blerg. Still 2/8 here, and I feel the cloud of rejection hovering.


Don't say that... we're the admits... :lol:


I think 2/8 is a mixed bag :D my numbers leave me no illusions of getting in; it was just a hail-Mary app. But I think there are 2/8 people (ie you) who have a definite shot.

Corrupty
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 2:48 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Corrupty » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:08 pm

No one has heard back yet? So is Monday the day then? :(

AS33
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:01 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby AS33 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:09 pm

PKozi wrote:
lndixon wrote:Omgggggg UR 2/10!!!!!!!! aghhhhh i'm going crazy over here!!! *rips out hair*

Same here. Did people in the last round of decisions get a new UR the day of calls. And if so, did it have any correlation to what the decision was?


I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Mal Reynolds » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:11 pm

AS33 wrote:I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.


Wait, I don't understand. If there weren't any new UR dates the day of calls how could there been a correlation?

User avatar
SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby SmbdyBringMeSomeHam » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:13 pm

Image

In anticipation of a ding. Cheers.

clifflee
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:06 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby clifflee » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:13 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:4th UR 2/10, my instincts are that this one is a WL.

I also got a 4th UR today. I'm not sure what to think.

AS33
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:01 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby AS33 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:14 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:
AS33 wrote:I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.


Wait, I don't understand. If there weren't any new UR dates the day of calls how could there been a correlation?


Sorry, misread your post. I thought you were asking about any and all of the UR dates

georgeconstanza
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby georgeconstanza » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:15 pm

New rule: You can't say "looks like it's going to be tomorrow" on twitter and then have it not be tomorrow. Would be very uncool, Chicago.

sports
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby sports » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:16 pm

Based on the tweet saying that they are "almost done," I bet the people updating today are the last of the bunch. When people stop updating the calls will probably start. They wouldn't have tweeted "looks like tomorrow is the day" if they weren't sure.

ralph_pootawn
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:14 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby ralph_pootawn » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:17 pm

good luck everyone.

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Mal Reynolds » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:29 pm

AS33 wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:
AS33 wrote:I don't think there were any new UR the day of calls. And yes, there seemed to be a correlation, just not a very strict one.


Wait, I don't understand. If there weren't any new UR dates the day of calls how could there been a correlation?


Sorry, misread your post. I thought you were asking about any and all of the UR dates


Gotcha gotcha. Yeah this batch looks very odd.

lndixon
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby lndixon » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:34 pm

sports wrote:Based on the tweet saying that they are "almost done," I bet the people updating today are the last of the bunch. When people stop updating the calls will probably start. They wouldn't have tweeted "looks like tomorrow is the day" if they weren't sure.



I agree. They know we're stressing. Surely they wouldn't do that to us... right? Right? o_O

hopefull2012
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby hopefull2012 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:37 pm

The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.

Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10

3.8, 173, 2 years good WE

User avatar
Byzantine
Posts: 276
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Byzantine » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:41 pm

hopefull2012 wrote:The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.

Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10

3.8, 173, 2 years good WE


It's scary the first time posting, but it gets better ;)

I've got a very similar timeline to yours. Still waiting to get the 2/10 though.

User avatar
FavoriteColorGRUE
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby FavoriteColorGRUE » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:41 pm

hopefull2012 wrote:The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.

Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10

3.8, 173, 2 years good WE



You've got me wishing I had a 4th UR! (My 3rd was 2/8)

User avatar
SmbdyBringMeSomeHam
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:36 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby SmbdyBringMeSomeHam » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:42 pm

FavoriteColorGRUE wrote:
hopefull2012 wrote:The Chicago process has made my sufficiently crazy to inspire my first post.

Status:
Submitted in December
2nd UR 2/2
3rd UR 2/8
4th UR 2/10

3.8, 173, 2 years good WE



You've got me wishing I had a 4th UR! (My 3rd was 2/8)


Same...I'm buggin' now.

justicefishy
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby justicefishy » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:42 pm

Good luck everyone!

maxpower430
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby maxpower430 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:46 pm

4th UR here too.

User avatar
FidusAchates
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby FidusAchates » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:48 pm

Still at 2/8 here. I'm getting worried, since it seems like the 2/10 group is really strong.
Last edited by FidusAchates on Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BrainsyK, Kaziende, lawlawland16 and 21 guests