Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby soj » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:47 pm

I don't know if they're done calling yet, but maybe yours are coming within the next two hours. I hope you two get good news.

snehpets
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby snehpets » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:47 pm

soj wrote:Chicago's 25-50-75th percentiles for c/o 2014 were
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173


Ahhh. I knew the ones on LSP and TLS couldn't be right but I couldn't find the others. Thank you! That makes me way less freaked out about not hearing anything.

Although I am still above one median and at one 75th. Argh. I bet my PS is annoying.

And nope, no HYS. I doubt I will, though last year I think everyone with my numbers got in off the waitlist. I'm right at both medians though, a little above GPA, so that's not good, plus I'm in UG with no work experience. I really love NYU though and am interested to hear from Columbia. To be honest, it would be hard for me to convince myself to take H (the only one of HYS I applied to) over either of the NYC schools (though I know this is horrifying to you :P )
Last edited by snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
PopTorts13
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:27 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby PopTorts13 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:48 pm

Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.[/quote]

Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.[/quote]

If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.[/quote]

1/12 here too. And I'm probably above both. Not sure though.[/quote]

...you're not

User avatar
Boston_NYG2245
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Boston_NYG2245 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:49 pm

Well now my lack of a call makes much more sense...

User avatar
Blessedassurance
Posts: 2081
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Blessedassurance » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:50 pm

Curious1 wrote:Yeah I know what you mean. Maybe it's subtle YPing? Not sure if we've talked but did you get into an HYP yet?


Princeton Law hasn't started making decisions yet.

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby soj » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:50 pm

Not now, Chicago-Kent. I'm in the fuckin' zone.

snehpets
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby snehpets » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:50 pm

Blessedassurance wrote:
Curious1 wrote:Yeah I know what you mean. Maybe it's subtle YPing? Not sure if we've talked but did you get into an HYP yet?


Princeton Law hasn't started making decisions yet.


:lol:

also I just got Chicago Kent too, haha. I was so relieved to finally get UChi over with and it wasn't them :(
Last edited by snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Curious1
Posts: 964
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Curious1 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm

snehpets wrote:
soj wrote:Chicago's 25-50-75th percentiles for c/o 2014 were
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173


Ahhh. I knew the ones on LSP and TLS couldn't be right but I couldn't find the others. Thank you! That makes me way less freaked out about not hearing anything.

Although I am still above one median and at one 75th. Argh. I bet my PS is annoying.

And nope, no HYS. I doubt I will, though last year I think everyone with my numbers got in off the waitlist. I'm right at both medians though, a little above GPA, so that's not good, plus I'm in UG with no work experience. I really love NYU though and am interested to hear from Columbia. To be honest, it would be hard for me to convince myself to take H (the only one of HYS I applied to) over either of the NYC schools (though I know this is horrifying to you :P )


When you get in I will try very hard to convince you that that is a bad decision :P

User avatar
Genki
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Genki » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm

snehpets wrote:
Curious1 wrote:
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?


Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.


Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.


If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.


172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?

jpal13
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:53 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby jpal13 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm

Nelson wrote:I'm going to be the only 1/9 not to get in. This is what I deserve for ticking off the Chicago gods last night. I had a few beers OK? I take back what I said about your full tuition scholarship that I'm not eligible for anyway.


I am a 1/9er and I see it as unlikely I will get in

User avatar
MobyDick
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:58 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby MobyDick » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:51 pm

I just got an email from Chicago-Kent and almost shit my pants. Thought it was a rejection.

User avatar
franklyscarlet
Posts: 2915
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby franklyscarlet » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:52 pm

MobyDick wrote:I just got an email from Chicago-Kent and almost shit my pants. Thought it was a rejection.


same. Chicago Kent, you dirty sons of bitches, do NOT email when Chi and NU are both doing decisions.

User avatar
AmandaPB
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby AmandaPB » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:52 pm

WhiteGuy5 wrote:
mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?


Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.

Just speculation, but I think mijenks is wrong. I’d guess that the ad comm had made a final decision by 1/9 for the 1/9 people. For the ones with UR dates later than 1/9, maybe they were just discussing your applications more in-depth. I don’t think 1/9 means auto-anything, just that they had made a definitive decision by that date.

User avatar
WhiteGuy5
Posts: 919
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby WhiteGuy5 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:52 pm

CHICAGO-KENT COLLEGE CAN GO TO HELL.

User avatar
Boston_NYG2245
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Boston_NYG2245 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:52 pm

soj wrote:Not now, Chicago-Kent. I'm in the fuckin' zone.


I got that email, it made me want to break something

sea15
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby sea15 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:53 pm

Honest to god I just got an email from Chicago kent. Ahhhhh

User avatar
catmo
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby catmo » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:53 pm

soj wrote:Not now, Chicago-Kent. I'm in the fuckin' zone.


THIS. It's so evil.

snehpets
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby snehpets » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:53 pm

Genki wrote:172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?


177/3.84
173/3.88
172/3.9
177/3.7

I forget the others...

User avatar
Nelson
Posts: 2061
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Nelson » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:54 pm

Chicago-Kent for TLS Troll of the Year.

User avatar
AmandaPB
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby AmandaPB » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:54 pm

snehpets wrote:
Genki wrote:172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?


177/3.84
173/3.88
172/3.9
177/3.7

I forget the others...

Jesus, maybe you all are just in the running for Rubensteins! I wouldn’t take the 1/12 as a bad sign with those numbers :)

User avatar
WhiteGuy5
Posts: 919
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby WhiteGuy5 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:54 pm

AmandaPB wrote:
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?


Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.

Just speculation, but I think mijenks is wrong. I’d guess that the ad comm had made a final decision by 1/9 for the 1/9 people. For the ones with UR dates later than 1/9, maybe they were just discussing your applications more in-depth. I don’t think 1/9 means auto-anything, just that they had made a definitive decision by that date.


I don't think the dates mean ANYTHING. At all. They could've decided you're in on 1/9, or you're out. Alternatively, they could've decided to take another look on 1/11 or 1/12, and decided either way as well.

User avatar
Genki
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Genki » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:55 pm

snehpets wrote:
Genki wrote:172/3.9 here with 1/12 UR date.
Any other 1/12 UR dates willing to share their numbers so we can get a better idea of what it might mean for us?


177/3.84
173/3.88
172/3.9
177/3.7

I forget the others...


Thanks.
Those numbers do make me feel a little better. I appear to be the weakest applicant of the group, but at least I'm in good company.

snehpets
Posts: 1143
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby snehpets » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:56 pm

All right, final 1/12 list for all of your over-analyzing/freaking out pleasure :)

178/3.7
177/3.86
177/3.7
175+/3.8+ (Canadian)
173/3.88
173/3.8
172/3.9
171/3.7
170/3.89
Last edited by snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Donny Crane
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Donny Crane » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:56 pm

Chicago-Kent doesn't beat out whatever TTT posted the "LSAT SCORES" in the subject-line email when October LSATers were waiting for scores. That was epic trolling.

11-5000
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby 11-5000 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:56 pm

1/12, 4 updates
Last edited by 11-5000 on Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”