Me too. Only 3:15 there...only 3:15 there...only 3:15 there...hotspur wrote:< This guypdftlvson wrote:Me too!46nyc wrote:MeDonny Crane wrote:Are there still several 1/09's who did not get called?
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- MachineLemon
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- Zelda
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks!crumpetsandtea wrote:Hoooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy shit. Nice cycle, congratulations on being done (with no WL/Rs, to boot!) Are you going to end up at HLS?Zelda wrote:
Got the call around noon today! I was at work so I couldn't post . Congratulations to all of the admits!
Application information: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Zelda
LSAT/GPA slightly altered.
It is not completely done yet! Waiting to hear back from a few schools but I don't include them on my profile until I get a decision . I am not sure where I will end up yet! Definitely looking forward to visiting schools.
Last edited by Zelda on Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AmoryB
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:39 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just got the call! Submitted end of Oct. and last UR on 1/9 . Numbers in profile.
- catmo
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are there still several 1/09's who did not get called?[/quote]
Me too. Only 3:15 there...only 3:15 there...only 3:15 there...[/quote][/quote][/quote]
Yeah I'm a 1/9-er. I guess that is not the magic date as I hoped. Wishful thinking.
Me too. Only 3:15 there...only 3:15 there...only 3:15 there...[/quote][/quote][/quote]
Yeah I'm a 1/9-er. I guess that is not the magic date as I hoped. Wishful thinking.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- catmo
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This makes more sense. Congrats to those who are in!mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- hotspur
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:05 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yikes. Makes sense with my <170 thoughmijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
175/3.5MobyDick wrote: All other uncalled 1/09's: what are your numbers?
- Mr. Somebody
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am 1/9 and I don't think I'm auto admit or auto-ding, probably auto waitlistmijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah but they were wrong. They were only made on Monday, or at least that's the impression I get from reading last year's thread.gatorlaw wrote:If I recall correctly, someone in a previous page said that last year calls were made on Friday and Monday. Could this be the case for us?
- Boston_NYG2245
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeesh, I hope not, thought that at 173/3.69 I'd at least have a shot...mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- Donny Crane
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I would guess my numbers are WL, though. They already admitted somebody with my exact numbers (although their softs definitely couldn't be worse than mine).mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- Boston_NYG2245
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They went until 5:30 CST last year too, so they might not be done...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rotaxkarter
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:24 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
>175/~3.8ringo wrote:175/3.5MobyDick wrote: All other uncalled 1/09's: what are your numbers?
- bigeast03
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm just hoping for a waitlist at this point. 169/3.93
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm a 1/9er who hasn't been called yet (stats and softs in profile).
I did just get into that other Chicago school about 10 mins ago, and I should be more excited except that UChi is driving me nuts.
I did just get into that other Chicago school about 10 mins ago, and I should be more excited except that UChi is driving me nuts.
SameMr. Somebody wrote:I am 1/9 and I don't think I'm auto admit or auto-ding, probably auto waitlistmijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Pretty sure I'm getting WLed so if they call at this point I'll be pleasantly surprised.
See you all in the Columbia thread in two weeks for VCE mania.
See you all in the Columbia thread in two weeks for VCE mania.
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.Curious1 wrote:Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
1/12 here too. And I'm probably above both. Not sure though.snehpets wrote:If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.Curious1 wrote:Ditto. I'm in class and if my phone rings damn it I'm answering.WhiteGuy5 wrote:Both my numbers are at/near their 75ths, an I'm a 1/9er so I dunno. Submitted early Nov too. It's stil 3:39 there folks so I'm not giving up hope until 5:30.mijenks wrote:Don't mean to rain on any parades but perhaps 1/09 is an "auto-" date. 168/3.52 here and I have 1/09 as my last update. Auto-admits first, auto-dings second?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I wonder what's wrong with us? I don't care so much about getting in as I do about knowing WHY I didn't get in when my numbers aren't too bad and yours are awesome. I want to use Columbia to negotiate money with NYU (or vice versa maybe) so I wish I had some way of knowing if I should expect a reject at Columbia because my personal statement is obnoxious or something.Curious1 wrote:1/12 here too. And I'm probably above both. Not sure though.snehpets wrote: If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Chicago's 25-50-75th percentiles for c/o 2014 were
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah I know what you mean. Maybe it's subtle YPing? Not sure if we've talked but did you get into an HYP yet?snehpets wrote:I wonder what's wrong with us? I don't care so much about getting in as I do about knowing WHY I didn't get in when my numbers aren't too bad and yours are awesome. I want to use Columbia to negotiate money with NYU (or vice versa maybe) so I wish I had some way of knowing if I should expect a reject at Columbia because my personal statement is obnoxious or something.Curious1 wrote:1/12 here too. And I'm probably above both. Not sure though.snehpets wrote: If the 75ths on LSP and the TLS page are correct then I'm above both and still haven't heard. I'm 1/12 though.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:36 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dat median...soj wrote:Chicago's 25-50-75th percentiles for c/o 2014 were
3.71-3.87-3.94
167-171-173
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login