Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
TheWatch
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:12 pm
Post
by TheWatch » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:05 pm
Mr. Somebody wrote:dakure wrote:Please fill this out so the rest of us have some news.
TheWatch wrote:dakure wrote:When do rejections come out?
if you're not in by noon CST assume the worst
-
Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Post
by Blessedassurance » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:06 pm
JustE wrote:Blessedassurance wrote:Schola wrote:For what it's worth, I am in the eastern time zone, think I would be a perfect fit for Chicago, have had a lot of success this cycle so far (including Harvard and Stanford), and I still haven't gotten a call. I guess anything is possible, but I would be surprised if I got rejected. So people should just take a deep breath. Edit: And I submitted in September
???
He's going to Harvard. Pay him no mind.
All that prestige! I'm jealous.
-
spek
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:40 am
Post
by spek » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:07 pm
Looks like the calls have stopped... :S
-
Mr. Somebody
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Post
by Mr. Somebody » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:07 pm
Well its noon CST isnt it? So are we doneskies
-
snehpets
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Post
by snehpets » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:07 pm
Blessedassurance wrote:snehpets wrote: What's ? about that? They got into Harvard and Stanford. Seems valid to say it would be surprising not to get into a lower ranked school.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious.
Serious. I can't tell if YOU'RE being sarcastic or serious. Obviously nothing is "100% numbers based," but this person obviously had the numbers to get into Harvard, which means they also probably didn't have something major wrong with their application. I personally would be surprised if they got flat out rejected based on those facts. Waitlisted maybe but that would also be surprising. It would be stupid to claim there's not a grades/LSAT based trend to these acceptances. I don't really see what you're saying. Of course I would love to believe I get in places bc I'm a special snowflake and my app is amazing, but when it comes down to it, it's a numbers game at most schools for most people.
Also if you're trolling me, lol, good job.
Last edited by
snehpets on Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Post
by dakure » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:07 pm
I think watch was kidding. Someone got in at 5:00 CST last year.
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Post
by JustE » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:08 pm
dakure wrote:I got a call from my mother. I hate her.
Again, I lol'd.
-
Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Post
by Doorkeeper » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:08 pm
spek wrote:Looks like the calls have stopped... :S
Lets pray that this is a lunch break instead of them stopping. The post about last year's acceptance calls said that they lasted a few hours. At this point it's been under 2 hours. Optimism!
-
Nobody
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:17 pm
Post
by Nobody » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:08 pm
dakure wrote:I got a call from my mother. I hate her.
I legit laughed out loud at this. Bartlett avatar helped.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Post
by WhiteGuy5 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:08 pm
The thread from last years showed people getting calls as late as 4:00PM...can everyone calm down...
-
Genki
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am
Post
by Genki » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:09 pm
New update on the twitter account:
"Still on the phones. We try calling all admits, but no int'l calls and no message if vm is full or on general/non-personal work vm accounts."
-
TheWatch
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:12 pm
Post
by TheWatch » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:09 pm
dakure wrote:I think watch was kidding. Someone got in at 5:00 CST last year.
I wish I could troll on your moms level
dakure wrote:I got a call from my mother. I hate her.
-
Schola
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:55 pm
Post
by Schola » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:13 pm
snehpets wrote:Blessedassurance wrote:snehpets wrote: What's ? about that? They got into Harvard and Stanford. Seems valid to say it would be surprising not to get into a lower ranked school.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious.
Serious. I can't tell if YOU'RE being sarcastic or serious. Obviously nothing is "100% numbers based," but this person obviously had the numbers to get into Harvard, which means they also probably didn't have something major wrong with their application. I personally would be surprised if they got flat out rejected based on those facts. Waitlisted maybe but that would also be surprising. It would be stupid to claim there's not a grades/LSAT based trend to these acceptances. I don't really see what you're saying. Of course I would love to believe I get in places bc I'm a special snowflake and my app is amazing, but when it comes down to it, it's a numbers game at most schools for most people.
Also if you're trolling me, lol, good job.
Just to clarify, I wasn't trying to be an ass or anything. I was simply trying to help people calm down. I do think anything is possible, and perhaps this admissions committee saw something in my app or found something about me on the web that made them think that they shouldn't admit me. I'm not ruling this out.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
ignatiusr
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:05 pm
Post
by ignatiusr » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:14 pm
Got the call about an hour ago. Complete 10/18, UR 1/9. Just a wild guess, but I wouldn't be surprised if those with 1/9 URs were above certain numerical cutoffs. Wouldn't mean that non-1/9ers are all rejects, just that their numbers are such that they require a more careful/prolonged review.
-
AntipodeanPhil
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm
Post
by AntipodeanPhil » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:14 pm
Gah! I got a call from Chicago earlier today, but I was in an area with bad reception. I tried to listen to the message but accidentally deleted it with my face. Why did I get a new phone at the height of decision season?
So, congratulations to everyone who got in! Hopefully I'm with you.
-
Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Post
by Nelson » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:15 pm
ignatiusr wrote:Got the call about an hour ago. Complete 10/18, UR 1/9. Just a wild guess, but I wouldn't be surprised if those with 1/9 URs were above certain numerical cutoffs. Wouldn't mean that non-1/9ers are all rejects, just that their numbers are such that they require a more careful/prolonged review.
Those are my dates. Don't go getting my hopes up like that.
-
dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Post
by dakure » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:16 pm
Nelson wrote:ignatiusr wrote:Got the call about an hour ago. Complete 10/18, UR 1/9. Just a wild guess, but I wouldn't be surprised if those with 1/9 URs were above certain numerical cutoffs. Wouldn't mean that non-1/9ers are all rejects, just that their numbers are such that they require a more careful/prolonged review.
Those are my dates. Don't go getting my hopes up like that.
Mine too. ugh.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
law2015
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:29 pm
Post
by law2015 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:17 pm
ignatiusr wrote:Got the call about an hour ago. Complete 10/18, UR 1/9. Just a wild guess, but I wouldn't be surprised if those with 1/9 URs were above certain numerical cutoffs. Wouldn't mean that non-1/9ers are all rejects, just that their numbers are such that they require a more careful/prolonged review.
I doubt it. I am UR 1/9 and my numbers are 3.5x and 173, which I think is waitlist bound.
-
addy11
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Post
by addy11 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:17 pm
Schola wrote:
Just to clarify, I wasn't trying to be an ass or anything. I was simply trying to help people calm down. I do think anything is possible, and perhaps this admissions committee saw something in my app or found something about me on the web that made them think that they shouldn't admit me. I'm not ruling this out.
It wouldn't surprise me if they were waiting until later in the day to do Rubies. That could be why you (and others with sweet numbers) haven't heard back.
-
amc987
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Post
by amc987 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:17 pm
IN!!! Just got the call a couple of minutes ago. Submitted 10/27, Complete 11/2. Stats in post history. Super excited.
All of my worrying was for nothing. Good luck to everyone else! So far 1/9 updates have meant good news, fwiw.
-
WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Post
by WhiteGuy5 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:17 pm
Schola wrote:snehpets wrote:Blessedassurance wrote:snehpets wrote: What's ? about that? They got into Harvard and Stanford. Seems valid to say it would be surprising not to get into a lower ranked school.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious.
Serious. I can't tell if YOU'RE being sarcastic or serious. Obviously nothing is "100% numbers based," but this person obviously had the numbers to get into Harvard, which means they also probably didn't have something major wrong with their application. I personally would be surprised if they got flat out rejected based on those facts. Waitlisted maybe but that would also be surprising. It would be stupid to claim there's not a grades/LSAT based trend to these acceptances. I don't really see what you're saying. Of course I would love to believe I get in places bc I'm a special snowflake and my app is amazing, but when it comes down to it, it's a numbers game at most schools for most people.
Also if you're trolling me, lol, good job.
Just to clarify, I wasn't trying to be an ass or anything. I was simply trying to help people calm down. I do think anything is possible, and perhaps this admissions committee saw something in my app or found something about me on the web that made them think that they shouldn't admit me. I'm not ruling this out.
I really don't know why you'd be surprised though to get rejected from Chicago...Chicago's numbers are not that high and it's one of those schools where numbers can determine far less than they can for a big class like Harvard. Granted, a Stanford admission means you had a stellar app...but that probably means you had a stellar app for STANFORD, not Chicago.
Best of luck to you though!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
kulshan
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm
Post
by kulshan » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:18 pm
In just now
. Congrats to all the admits today!
-
snehpets
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Post
by snehpets » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:18 pm
ignatiusr wrote:Got the call about an hour ago. Complete 10/18, UR 1/9. Just a wild guess, but I wouldn't be surprised if those with 1/9 URs were above certain numerical cutoffs. Wouldn't mean that non-1/9ers are all rejects, just that their numbers are such that they require a more careful/prolonged review.
Yeah, perhaps. Although I'm kind of surprised (now I'M going to sound like a humble brag asshole), because my numbers are on par with a lot of the 1/9 people that have gotten in and I don't
think there's anything weird wrong with my app. I've gotten in other places (though certainly not harvard or stanford). I'm 1/12. However, 1/6 was my first UR so I guess I'm kind of weird anyway. Maybe there was just something they didn't like about mine. Guess we'll find out by tonight!
-
dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Post
by dakure » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:18 pm
My family is trolling hard.
-
lionelmessi
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Post
by lionelmessi » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:20 pm
I am a 169/3.78, complete 10/13, UR 1/9....so maybe it just means you are for sure something. Because I'm pretty sure I'm not an auto-admit. Haven't heard anything.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login