Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
Champion
Posts: 286
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Champion » Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:38 pm

10/25 Submit..First UR 12/7, Second UR 12/22. Seems like a few people got the second update yesterday

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:46 pm

anewaphorist wrote:^I agree inasmuch as I think there will be more ED admits in the coming days.

Someone I know called the admissions office and they indicated that they are looking at RDers and may be taking more EDers next week (speculative)

User avatar
larsoner
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:33 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby larsoner » Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:17 pm

Also got my second UR yesterday. Submitted mid October.

User avatar
msblaw89
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby msblaw89 » Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:57 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:
anewaphorist wrote:^I agree inasmuch as I think there will be more ED admits in the coming days.

Someone I know called the admissions office and they indicated that they are looking at RDers and may be taking more EDers next week (speculative)

Bad news bears?

BigJohnso
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:55 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby BigJohnso » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:46 pm

TemporarySaint wrote:
I'm not sure if that makes sense given who was admitted. If they wanted further review ED applicants in light of what the RD pool looksl like it would've made sense to admit people with the highest indexes and then judge the borderline aps later. We don't really see that. Either more ED admits are coming next week (which I think is most likely, but can't figure out why there's a gap in admissions), they picked random names out of a hat, or admissions went beyond numbers.



Upon further thought, I agree with everything you say here.

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:44 pm

msblaw89 wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:
anewaphorist wrote:^I agree inasmuch as I think there will be more ED admits in the coming days.

Someone I know called the admissions office and they indicated that they are looking at RDers and may be taking more EDers next week (speculative)

Bad news bears?

no, I think semi-good news bears

IMO, it meant that they may not be following tradition of week one admits and week two denials and waitlists

User avatar
msblaw89
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby msblaw89 » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:02 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
msblaw89 wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:
anewaphorist wrote:^I agree inasmuch as I think there will be more ED admits in the coming days.

Someone I know called the admissions office and they indicated that they are looking at RDers and may be taking more EDers next week (speculative)

Bad news bears?

no, I think semi-good news bears

IMO, it meant that they may not be following tradition of week one admits and week two denials and waitlists

I hope bc the 166 4.0 really gave me hope

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:06 am

msblaw89 wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:no, I think semi-good news bears

IMO, it meant that they may not be following tradition of week one admits and week two denials and waitlists

I hope bc the 166 4.0 really gave me hope

yeah, I would be so disappointed if I don't get into Chicago. I don't mean that I deserve to get in, but I would absolutely love to go there.

User avatar
crooked
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:23 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby crooked » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:17 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
msblaw89 wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:no, I think semi-good news bears

IMO, it meant that they may not be following tradition of week one admits and week two denials and waitlists

I hope bc the 166 4.0 really gave me hope

yeah, I would be so disappointed if I don't get into Chicago. I don't mean that I deserve to get in, but I would absolutely love to go there.


You deserve to get in.

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:21 am

crooked wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I would be so disappointed if I don't get into Chicago. I don't mean that I deserve to get in, but I would absolutely love to go there.


You deserve to get in.

I wonder if they know who I am at this point.

User avatar
Killingly
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Killingly » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:26 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
crooked wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I would be so disappointed if I don't get into Chicago. I don't mean that I deserve to get in, but I would absolutely love to go there.


You deserve to get in.

I wonder if they know who I am at this point.


You'll get in.

User avatar
franklyscarlet
Posts: 2915
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby franklyscarlet » Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:39 am

Killingly wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:
crooked wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I would be so disappointed if I don't get into Chicago. I don't mean that I deserve to get in, but I would absolutely love to go there.


You deserve to get in.

I wonder if they know who I am at this point.


You'll get in.


If they know who you are, they know all of tls will collectively cut a bitch if you don't get in. They wouldn't dare. :lol:

User avatar
UnamSanctam
Posts: 7167
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby UnamSanctam » Sat Dec 24, 2011 10:49 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
crooked wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, I would be so disappointed if I don't get into Chicago. I don't mean that I deserve to get in, but I would absolutely love to go there.


You deserve to get in.

I wonder if they know who I am at this point.


I mean I'd rather they roll you and you get into Mich and come hang out with me, but for your sake I know you're getting into Chi.

BigJohnso
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:55 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby BigJohnso » Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:35 am

msblaw89 wrote:I hope bc the 166 4.0 really gave me hope



Glad to be a source of hope on this holiday :D

I hope you guys get in.

law2015
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby law2015 » Sun Dec 25, 2011 12:38 pm

My UR review date changed to 12/25 today, hopefully I will get my decision sooner than later. Merry Christmas everybody!

User avatar
amc987
Posts: 568
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby amc987 » Sun Dec 25, 2011 7:04 pm

law2015 wrote:My UR review date changed to 12/25 today, hopefully I will get my decision sooner than later. Merry Christmas everybody!


+1. Maybe a Christmas UR update is a good omen! Hope everyone is having a wonderful holiday!

User avatar
msblaw89
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby msblaw89 » Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:19 pm

SO are most EDers still at 12/14?

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:24 pm

msblaw89 wrote:SO are most EDers still at 12/14?

yeah

User avatar
skers
Posts: 4950
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby skers » Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:30 pm

msblaw89 wrote:SO are most EDers still at 12/14?


I'm guessing the other updates are RDs.

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:35 pm

TemporarySaint wrote:
msblaw89 wrote:SO are most EDers still at 12/14?


I'm guessing the other updates are RDs.

I feel like any RD updates today are good news. I want

law2015
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby law2015 » Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:39 pm

I am RD and am also hoping that it is good news but it probably doesn't mean anything. Its strange that they have updated on a Christmas sunday though.

User avatar
msblaw89
Posts: 2669
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby msblaw89 » Sun Dec 25, 2011 9:58 pm

Could just be me, but it seemed like there wasn't very many ED acceptances

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:09 pm

msblaw89 wrote:Could just be me, but it seemed like there wasn't very many ED acceptances

Yeah, there didn't seem to be many EDs last week. Hopefully, they will let more of us in this week

User avatar
mattviphky
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:43 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby mattviphky » Sun Dec 25, 2011 11:02 pm

if only I could go to this school. Cursed freshman year and section 2 of LR.

User avatar
luxxe
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:12 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby luxxe » Sun Dec 25, 2011 11:15 pm

msblaw89 wrote:Could just be me, but it seemed like there wasn't very many ED acceptances

There weren't that many of us applying ED, and there are 7 acceptances on LSN for this cycle vs. 6 for the last - not that this is representative of the entire ED applicant pool, of course, but maybe of the people on TLS?

I'm still on 12/14 as well. And all the rejections/WLs seem to come the last possible day they have to give us a decision. Yayyy.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”