Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- danielhay11
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm taking smug solace in the fact that whoever wrote the waitlist email overlooked a run-on sentence.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Went UR today. Think that just means I'm in the next group of decisions? Is it going to take another few months?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:59 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Looking at the Spreadsheet, it's so obvious they did some serious YP.
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was wait listed, so not sure that you can say they aren't holistic, or that they don't read essays and LOR's.weezer21 wrote:Blessedassurance wrote:Bullshit. They lack the balls for that. You need to be top dog to pull off that Yale-Standard shit (see Berkeley).kennethellenparcell wrote:I've been to a few Chicago admissions events (and went there for undergrad) - I've heard multiple times from the current students, alums and admissions officers that Chicago is very holistic in their review of applicants. It's definitely not just a numbers game.
- kennethellenparcell
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Definitely definitely a possibility. And I do love my alma mater (but have been trying not to engage in Chicago trolling on TLS). However, how much is the yield percentage really weighted in the US News rankings formula? I don't know. I just don't think that Chicago's professed holisticness (?) is completely bullshit.
snehpets wrote:Yeah, I feel like that's bs Chicago trolling (not by you KEP, but to you). With the numbers of people being WLed (not including me) I wouldn't be surprised if they're working on their atrocious yield rate.Blessedassurance wrote:Bullshit. They lack the balls for that. You need to be top dog to pull off that Yale-Standard shit (see Berkeley).kennethellenparcell wrote:I've been to a few Chicago admissions events (and went there for undergrad) - I've heard multiple times from the current students, alums and admissions officers that Chicago is very holistic in their review of applicants. It's definitely not just a numbers game.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mr. Somebody
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't all law schools say they are holistic? That was my impression last time I went to a law school fair and they all sounded like they were reading from the same script. I'm sure this is true to small extent, as with every school - someone like EMZE has military service, which will be in his favor. But unless we can show that those accepted with great numbers also had better softs than the great numbers who were WLed, it's more likely this is YP or some other strategy they are employing. Just my two cents.
I did hear someone on the forum say that T6 do not YP, however. So I don't know what to think.
I did hear someone on the forum say that T6 do not YP, however. So I don't know what to think.
- Kring345
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:30 pm
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Anyone not named Y, H or S has to deal with the likelihood of their best applicants choosing Y, H or S. This wouldn't be an issue if USNWR abolished factoring in the stupid yield-protect stuff. Unfortunately, it's a factor. It's the whole point of the Rubenstein (with exceptions) and NW's new ED thing. The waitlist is designed to gauge your interest etc.kennethellenparcell wrote:Proof?
This is not to say Chicago is not a good school. It's a fantastic school. They just don't have the luxury of being a black-box and still managing to hold on to its position or overtaking Columbia.
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also WL'd.
around 25th GPA; >75th LSAT URM.
around 25th GPA; >75th LSAT URM.
- dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I fell asleep. and woke up to a WL email. woohoo.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow, I'm surprised at all the people with high numbers getting WLed. Hell, some of the people have numbers higher than me.
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:16 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
how many were pulled from w/l last year. How many can one expect this year.
UGH. WL and Chi was definitely my top pick.
UGH. WL and Chi was definitely my top pick.
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Higher than you? That's impossible to imagineHawkeye Pierce wrote:Wow, I'm surprised at all the people with high numbers getting WLed. Hell, some of the people have numbers higher than me.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I wasn't trying to be humorous, I think your numbers are awesome and I think they're worthy of Yale. Nevermind, Chicago and Michigan. This cycle has been wonderful for some and shitty for others. Mind telling us what you think might be holding you back?madvillain wrote:I appreciate the humor, but I think I might resign myself to UVA, the way things are going. I feel bad even for saying that because UVA has been the only school to even offer me a scholarship so far.JoeMo wrote:I hope your PS and 250 were polished and that you sent an app to Yale. If so, enjoy New Haven.jpal13 wrote:madvillain wrote:Waitlisted as well. Just gonna post my real stats here, no point in hiding them anymore, 179/3.86. Held by Harvard and Michigan, WL'd by Penn earlier this week. No NYU acceptance either. I am very depressed.
????? That is not right, you will be accepted somewhere though bro. You are a YP and if you write a LOCI I'm sure you will see some love.
- Blessedassurance
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well, it's not a blatant yield-protect per se. If you show genuine interest, conduct interviews if necessary etc., there's a high probability of getting in off the waitlist if you had the right numbers to begin with. This is a pretty smart move actually, second only to Duke's PT strategy this year.Mr. Somebody wrote:I did hear someone on the forum say that T6 do not YP, however. So I don't know what to think.
- dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
soj wrote:repost for new pagedakure wrote:Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... UXZPU0E6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... n_US#gid=0
- catholicgirl
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Waitlisted. Applied early october, 165/3.9
Officially a Chicago bootycall. Dear everyone HYS secure, please withdraw so Chicago will call me at 2 a.m and tell me they love me and need me in their life.
Officially a Chicago bootycall. Dear everyone HYS secure, please withdraw so Chicago will call me at 2 a.m and tell me they love me and need me in their life.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Lawbro
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
To those that were accepted, what kind of numbers did you have? I just sent in my apps yesterday (3.85,170) and I want to know what to expect
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Pretty sure they're a foreign applicant which can be unpredictable.JoeMo wrote: I wasn't trying to be humorous, I think your numbers are awesome and I think they're worthy of Yale. Nevermind, Chicago and Michigan. This cycle has been wonderful for some and shitty for others. Mind telling us what you think might be holding you back?
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think some of them really are. Michigan being one of them. I have seen some people with not so stellar numbers (me) get into Michigan and I think it's had to do with the rest of the application package. That being said, I don't know what Chicago's deal is. I would've thought a lot of the people WL'ed today would've gotten in. As for me, I thought I was a ding as my numbers aren't in the realm of competitiveness for the school and I wasn't wrong.Mr. Somebody wrote:Don't all law schools say they are holistic? That was my impression last time I went to a law school fair and they all sounded like they were reading from the same script. I'm sure this is true to small extent, as with every school - someone like EMZE has military service, which will be in his favor. But unless we can show that those accepted with great numbers also had better softs than the great numbers who were WLed, it's more likely this is YP or some other strategy they are employing. Just my two cents.
I did hear someone on the forum say that T6 do not YP, however. So I don't know what to think.
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- foxylaxy
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1catholicgirl wrote:Waitlisted. Applied early october, 165/3.9
Officially a Chicago bootycall. Dear everyone HYS secure, please withdraw so Chicago will call me at 2 a.m and tell me they love me and need me in their life.
- kennethellenparcell
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I hear everything you're saying. But then why do two people who have the same numbers (as per LSN) get different decisions? Also, it seems to me that the weight given to the acceptance rate in the US News formula is not too significant (isn't it weighted by .025?). So while certain evidence points to Chicago engaging in yield protection, certain evidence also points to them being holistic in their evaluation. Of course, being "holistic" may also mean screening for some sort of demonstrated committment to Chicago in your application. Who the hell knows.
Blessedassurance wrote:Anyone not named Y, H or S has to deal with the likelihood of their best applicants choosing Y, H or S. This wouldn't be an issue if USNWR abolished factoring in the stupid yield-protect stuff. Unfortunately, it's a factor. It's the whole point of the Rubenstein (with exceptions) and NW's new ED thing. The waitlist is designed to gauge your interest etc.kennethellenparcell wrote:Proof?
This is not to say Chicago is not a good school. It's a fantastic school. They just don't have the luxury of being a black-box and still managing to hold on to its position or overtaking Columbia.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
^ I doubt it. I have almost no ECs and didn't demonstrate a commitment to Chicago in my application.
- kennethellenparcell
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You're probably just an uber awesome person.
Hawkeye Pierce wrote:^ I doubt it. I have almost no ECs and didn't demonstrate a commitment to Chicago in my application.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login