Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133915
Has your status updated?[/quote]Hannibal wrote:Dinged via snail mail.
Eh, being a splitter my target seems to be really small between reach and YP. I'm just venting frustration over all my WLs, don't mind me. I'm actually pretty happy with the idea of going to UIUC.doppelganger wrote: I think its probably just yield protection. They didn't think you'd actually attend due to being out of state and high LSAT--and you'd hurt their numbers. If/when I get the rejection letter, it won't be because I am over-qualified. Perhaps that takes some of the sting out?
thanks for the congrats allCMDantes wrote:Congrats! I was a long shot too, I think UT Law really does look at more than numbers.beachbum wrote:Haha, I'd still say you were a long shot for UT. You must have had one hell of an app. Congrats.labacia wrote:Got a call on Thurs afternoon that I'm in.....still EFFING ECSTATIC!! Haven't taken my Longhorns hat off since...I honestly was really worried and I had had people (advisors, TLS) give me the impression that it was a long shot...
Info: In state, 3.6, 165
I definitely didn't feel good when I found out that they were deferring my EA into regular decision (applied in October), but it worked out
good luck everyone!!!! theres light at the end of the anxiety tunnel, promise!
I feel ya. I knew I was a long shot, but was hoping the In-State status would help. Guess it's bye bye Austin. =(stlisforlovers wrote:Dinged via snail mail 167/ 3.7. First straight out rejections suck.
Sorry guys that blows. Did your status checker change by chance? Texas is my first choice and I am on the west coast so I can't check my mail until after work =/lokist86 wrote:I feel ya. I knew I was a long shot, but was hoping the In-State status would help. Guess it's bye bye Austin. =(stlisforlovers wrote:Dinged via snail mail 167/ 3.7. First straight out rejections suck.
Sorry to hear that man. Were you part of the ED deferred group?Hannibal wrote:Dinged via snail mail.
Under status updates, it says "Application denied 1/20/2011."JTMan wrote:Sorry guys that blows. Did your status checker change by chance? Texas is my first choice and I am on the west coast so I can't check my mail until after work =/lokist86 wrote:I feel ya. I knew I was a long shot, but was hoping the In-State status would help. Guess it's bye bye Austin. =(stlisforlovers wrote:Dinged via snail mail 167/ 3.7. First straight out rejections suck.
Mine says the same and I was part of the ED deferred group.stlisforlovers wrote:Under status updates, it says "Application denied 1/20/2011."JTMan wrote:Sorry guys that blows. Did your status checker change by chance? Texas is my first choice and I am on the west coast so I can't check my mail until after work =/lokist86 wrote:I feel ya. I knew I was a long shot, but was hoping the In-State status would help. Guess it's bye bye Austin. =(stlisforlovers wrote:Dinged via snail mail 167/ 3.7. First straight out rejections suck.
You cut me deep, Texas.
Nope.beachbum wrote:Sorry to hear that man. Were you part of the ED deferred group?Hannibal wrote:Dinged via snail mail.
OMG YES!!! I'm SO HAPPY FOR YOU!!! Was rooting and crossing my fingers!!!francisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
CONGRATULATIONS FRANCIS!!!! Please tell me if your status check has changed. I know you were really wanting this.francisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
Dean said it would change in a couple of days, I think.doppelganger wrote:CONGRATULATIONS FRANCIS!!!! Please tell me if your status check has changed. I know you were really wanting this.francisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
akili wrote:OMG YES!!! I'm SO HAPPY FOR YOU!!! Was rooting and crossing my fingers!!!francisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
Congrats!!francisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
Yea I think I am pretty much giving up hope too at this point.ArchRoark wrote:Congrats!!francisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
I have pretty much resigned myself to expect a rejection. Why o why does Texas have to hate splitters so much.
Thats awesome man congratsfrancisConn wrote:IN AT TEXAS LAW VIA CALL FROM DEAN INGRAM!!!!!
Relief.
see you there! (I still can't believe I'm saying it)