Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
HLA
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby HLA » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:22 pm

kak5n wrote:
whathojeeves wrote:I wonder, have all the calls this morning been to east coast/midwest applicants? Its still pretty early for phone calls in California -- maybe DD is letting me sleep in!

...one can always hope.


This might be true.. I'm on the east coast and she called at 10:45 am my time... too early for California



same here

User avatar
pennyloafer17
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:44 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby pennyloafer17 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:23 pm

whathojeeves wrote:I wonder, have all the calls this morning been to east coast/midwest applicants? Its still pretty early for phone calls in California -- maybe DD is letting me sleep in!

...one can always hope.


I'm in California. Woken up by good news!

HLA
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby HLA » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:23 pm

Confused7 wrote:A big congratulations to everyone!! I guess they're trying to get a lot of decisions out before the break. Would people mind posting the dates for when they became "submitted for review"?



mid-October

User avatar
whathojeeves
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:39 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby whathojeeves » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:42 pm

pennyloafer17 wrote:
whathojeeves wrote:I wonder, have all the calls this morning been to east coast/midwest applicants? Its still pretty early for phone calls in California -- maybe DD is letting me sleep in!

...one can always hope.


I'm in California. Woken up by good news!


Darn. On a side note, am now convinced that law schools deans get a kick out of the unexpected, usually early morning, phone call (see: UCLA law).

rundoxierun
Posts: 1893
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby rundoxierun » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:16 pm

Are we 100% sure that LSAC automatically sends out new reports for grade updates like they do with LSAT score updates?? Assuming my speech prof isnt an asshole, looks like I will have a nice 3.94 for this semester to send Stanford

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:24 pm

tkgrrett wrote:Are we 100% sure that LSAC automatically sends out new reports for grade updates like they do with LSAT score updates?? Assuming my speech prof isnt an asshole, looks like I will have a nice 3.94 for this semester to send Stanford


Yes. I will be updating.

rundoxierun
Posts: 1893
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby rundoxierun » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:26 pm

r6_philly wrote:
tkgrrett wrote:Are we 100% sure that LSAC automatically sends out new reports for grade updates like they do with LSAT score updates?? Assuming my speech prof isnt an asshole, looks like I will have a nice 3.94 for this semester to send Stanford


Yes. I will be updating.


Sweet, thanks.. funny thing is that it will raise my cumulative gpa but lower my degree.

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:28 pm

tkgrrett wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
tkgrrett wrote:Are we 100% sure that LSAC automatically sends out new reports for grade updates like they do with LSAT score updates?? Assuming my speech prof isnt an asshole, looks like I will have a nice 3.94 for this semester to send Stanford


Yes. I will be updating.


Sweet, thanks.. funny thing is that it will raise my cumulative gpa but lower my degree.


did you get a A- or something? I hope to get a 4.0+ for the first time ever. But that's grad so probably no one cares.

rundoxierun
Posts: 1893
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby rundoxierun » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:33 pm

r6_philly wrote:
did you get a A- or something? I hope to get a 4.0+ for the first time ever. But that's grad so probably no one cares.


Yep, but it was the kind of A- to be proud of. It was in an upper-division genetics course. Pulled off a miraculous 88 on the final(class avg. was 59 and high was 91).

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:35 pm

tkgrrett wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
did you get a A- or something? I hope to get a 4.0+ for the first time ever. But that's grad so probably no one cares.


Yep, but it was the kind of A- to be proud of. It was in an upper-division genetics course. Pulled off a miraculous 88 on the final(class avg. was 59 and high was 91).


Whaaa you should have gotten a A and the 91 an A+. Who gives A- for 3 points off the top..

User avatar
2011Cycle
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:08 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 2011Cycle » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:38 pm

r6_philly wrote:
tkgrrett wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
did you get a A- or something? I hope to get a 4.0+ for the first time ever. But that's grad so probably no one cares.


Yep, but it was the kind of A- to be proud of. It was in an upper-division genetics course. Pulled off a miraculous 88 on the final(class avg. was 59 and high was 91).


Whaaa you should have gotten a A and the 91 an A+. Who gives A- for 3 points off the top..


Those schools without +'s or -'s would have thrown a B on the 88, killing transferring or applying to grad school.

rundoxierun
Posts: 1893
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby rundoxierun » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:41 pm

2011Cycle wrote:
r6_philly wrote:Whaaa you should have gotten a A and the 91 an A+. Who gives A- for 3 points off the top..


Those schools without +'s or -'s would have thrown a B on the 88, killing transferring or applying to grad school.


Ehh the 88 was just for the final exam. My total grade was a 91.

User avatar
cardinals1989
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby cardinals1989 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:43 pm

Hmmm...I guess Dean Deal is done for now. Maybe she will have a few afternoon acceptances? :mrgreen:

User avatar
2011Cycle
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:08 am

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 2011Cycle » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:47 pm

tkgrrett wrote:
2011Cycle wrote:
r6_philly wrote:Whaaa you should have gotten a A and the 91 an A+. Who gives A- for 3 points off the top..


Those schools without +'s or -'s would have thrown a B on the 88, killing transferring or applying to grad school.


Ehh the 88 was just for the final exam. My total grade was a 91.



The the 91 is out of line for an A-. That's like high school where 93 was an A.

User avatar
cardinals1989
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby cardinals1989 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:47 pm

Contemplating doing a campus visit in January to see everything, get some material for a LOCI if necessary, and possibly give my application a miniscule boost. Who want to come with?? :P

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:48 pm

2011Cycle wrote:
The the 91 is out of line for an A-. That's like high school where 93 was an A.


I guess the cut off for A- is 92. Sucks though. Shoulda've rounded it to an A.

User avatar
thecilent
Posts: 2506
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby thecilent » Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:50 pm

cardinals1989 wrote:Contemplating doing a campus visit in January to see everything, get some material for a LOCI if necessary, and possibly give my application a miniscule boost. Who want to come with?? :P

You are going to be soo disappointed if you don't get in lol

User avatar
daisyduke
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby daisyduke » Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:40 pm

--ImageRemoved--

Diuretic
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:49 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Diuretic » Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:47 pm

daisyduke wrote:--ImageRemoved--


*Raises hand*, I hope there's more calls today!

User avatar
Weirdlog
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:48 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Weirdlog » Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:52 pm

Diuretic wrote:
daisyduke wrote:--ImageRemoved--


*Raises hand*, I hope there's more calls today!


Me too... but if not, does anyone know if the admissions office will be closed for all of next week until after the holidays?

User avatar
kazu
Posts: 1602
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby kazu » Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:53 pm

daisyduke wrote:--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:00 pm

kazu wrote:
daisyduke wrote:--ImageRemoved--

4102011
Posts: 1724
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:00 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 4102011 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:01 pm

Knock wrote:
kazu wrote:
daisyduke wrote:--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
s0ph1e2007
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby s0ph1e2007 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:09 pm

dulcatis wrote:
Knock wrote:
kazu wrote:
daisyduke wrote:--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
s0ph1e2007
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby s0ph1e2007 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:10 pm

r6_philly wrote:
tkgrrett wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
did you get a A- or something? I hope to get a 4.0+ for the first time ever. But that's grad so probably no one cares.


Yep, but it was the kind of A- to be proud of. It was in an upper-division genetics course. Pulled off a miraculous 88 on the final(class avg. was 59 and high was 91).


Whaaa you should have gotten a A and the 91 an A+. Who gives A- for 3 points off the top..


I called my prof, who I'm friends with so this wasn't confrontational, and asked him why I had an A- and not an A and he informed me that he did not give As for this class...... whhhaaa??

:evil:




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blackpi, CaptCarpe, danid83, freekick, guybourdin, lillawyer2, mse2020, ohhellocharmedimsure, Pomegranate27, Snowjon, Thelaw23 and 31 guests