Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
pinkzeppelin
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby pinkzeppelin » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:19 pm

zarabenjamin wrote:
123kl wrote:
123kl wrote:Is it her lunchtime now? :)



i hope so...! and i hope she comes back refreshed and ready to make many, many more calls...


+1!

But it doesn't look like she called people who submitted in late October until the second wave of calls last year. :( Oh well, I can wait a week. I think...

neonx
Posts: 1025
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby neonx » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:19 pm

123kl wrote:
CastleRock wrote:I sure hope I get in. This feels like my last opportunity to get a t3.


My ONLY real opportunity to get a T3, I think. I would LOVE to move to CA, and I love Stanford. Please let me in!


+1. Congratulations to all of those amazing applicants just admitted to-day.

123kl
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 123kl » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:20 pm

pinkzeppelin wrote:
zarabenjamin wrote:
123kl wrote:
123kl wrote:Is it her lunchtime now? :)



i hope so...! and i hope she comes back refreshed and ready to make many, many more calls...


+1!

But it doesn't look like she called people who submitted in late October until the second wave of calls last year. :( Oh well, I can wait a week. I think...


Yeah, even if I was awesome, there's no way I'd be admitted today with a November UR. Why am I so antsy then?

User avatar
thecilent
Posts: 2506
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby thecilent » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:23 pm

Can we all posts just our GPAs? I really want to see what the GPAs looks like in here.. If not, forget it

3.8 (wondering if I'm on the low end here)

123kl
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 123kl » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:24 pm

thecilent wrote:Can we all posts just our GPAs? I really want to see what the GPAs looks like in here.. If not, forget it

3.8 (wondering if I'm on the low end here)


4+

User avatar
cardinals1989
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby cardinals1989 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:25 pm

thecilent wrote:Can we all posts just our GPAs? I really want to see what the GPAs looks like in here.. If not, forget it

3.8 (wondering if I'm on the low end here)


3.96

User avatar
The Stig
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:27 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby The Stig » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:25 pm

I'm in! I'm literally shaking... my phone kept buzzing for emails/voicemails while I was in the basement of a building stuck in french class... I go outside and look at my visual voicemail and see "Paolo Alto, CA" and my jaw just drops.

Submit 10/9
Complete (UR?) 10/21
172/3.95, SLS specific LORs

Good luck to everyone else! !!!! !!!!!!

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:25 pm

thecilent wrote:Can we all posts just our GPAs? I really want to see what the GPAs looks like in here.. If not, forget it

3.8 (wondering if I'm on the low end here)


3.91

User avatar
thecilent
Posts: 2506
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby thecilent » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:27 pm

Congrats Stig!

Oh and I have no shot at Stanford. I should not be following this thread.

User avatar
cardinals1989
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby cardinals1989 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:29 pm

The Stig wrote:I'm in! I'm literally shaking... my phone kept buzzing for emails/voicemails while I was in the basement of a building stuck in french class... I go outside and look at my visual voicemail and see "Paolo Alto, CA" and my jaw just drops.

Submit 10/9
Complete (UR?) 10/21
172/3.95, SLS specific LORs

Good luck to everyone else! !!!! !!!!!!


Congratulations! This post also scares me because I was UR 10/18 right around this time. Also, my numbers are fairly close, LSAT a couple points lower.

WestOfTheRest
Posts: 1412
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby WestOfTheRest » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:33 pm

I let myself believe I actually had a chance, but now I'm thinking that my chances are approximately 0.

User avatar
mrmangs
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby mrmangs » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:34 pm

CastleRock wrote:I let myself believe I actually had a chance, but now I'm thinking that my chances are approximately 0.


That is the healthy way of looking at things, regardless of one's numbers.

User avatar
Fresh
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Fresh » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:36 pm

Applied 11/5 under review since 11/16... Doesn't look like anyone who has applied that late has been accepted yet?

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:36 pm

cardinals1989 wrote:
The Stig wrote:I'm in! I'm literally shaking... my phone kept buzzing for emails/voicemails while I was in the basement of a building stuck in french class... I go outside and look at my visual voicemail and see "Paolo Alto, CA" and my jaw just drops.

Submit 10/9
Complete (UR?) 10/21
172/3.95, SLS specific LORs

Good luck to everyone else! !!!! !!!!!!


Congratulations! This post also scares me because I was UR 10/18 right around this time. Also, my numbers are fairly close, LSAT a couple points lower.


Same. I think i'm UR 10/22. Congrats Stig!

123kl
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 123kl » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:36 pm

Fresh wrote:Applied 11/5 under review since 11/16... Doesn't look like anyone who has applied that late has been accepted yet?


Correct.

User avatar
LilMonsterAnnie
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby LilMonsterAnnie » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:53 pm

Knock wrote:
r6_philly wrote:TBF I submitted mid Oct. I don't even know if there is a chance to be called at this point, with my median numbers.



:?:

:?

User avatar
LilMonsterAnnie
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby LilMonsterAnnie » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:57 pm

mrmangs wrote:
CastleRock wrote:I let myself believe I actually had a chance, but now I'm thinking that my chances are approximately 0.


That is the healthy way of looking at things, regardless of one's numbers.


:D

User avatar
LilMonsterAnnie
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby LilMonsterAnnie » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:58 pm

Fresh wrote:Applied 11/5 under review since 11/16... Doesn't look like anyone who has applied that late has been accepted yet?


it sounds like Sept/Oct so far. You and I are in the same boat.

Applied 10/31
UR 11/8

WestOfTheRest
Posts: 1412
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby WestOfTheRest » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:58 pm

mrmangs wrote:
CastleRock wrote:I let myself believe I actually had a chance, but now I'm thinking that my chances are approximately 0.


That is the healthy way of looking at things, regardless of one's numbers.

I don't really know if this was sarcastic or not.

User avatar
LilMonsterAnnie
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:56 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby LilMonsterAnnie » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:00 pm

CastleRock wrote:
mrmangs wrote:
CastleRock wrote:I let myself believe I actually had a chance, but now I'm thinking that my chances are approximately 0.


That is the healthy way of looking at things, regardless of one's numbers.

I don't really know if this was sarcastic or not.



not to get all touchy-feely
but BE POSITIVE and believe in good things. :wink:

WestOfTheRest
Posts: 1412
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby WestOfTheRest » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:05 pm

Guys, looking at last years LSN, if you have a gpa below a 3.9 your wait could be pretty long. Out of 19 applicants accepted with sub 3.9, only two got their decisions in December.

But it doesn't look good anyways, as 9 of the people with sub 3.9 gpas were URMs. So pretty much, my mid 3.8 means I am fucked.

123kl
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby 123kl » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:05 pm

CastleRock wrote:Guys, looking at last years LSN, if you have a gpa below a 3.9 your wait could be pretty long. Out of 19 applicants accepted with sub 3.9, only two got their decisions in December.

But it doesn't look good anyways, as 9 of the people with sub 3.9 gpas were URMs. So pretty much, my mid 3.8 means I am fucked.


What about sub-170 LSATS?

User avatar
thecilent
Posts: 2506
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby thecilent » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:07 pm

CastleRock wrote:Guys, looking at last years LSN, if you have a gpa below a 3.9 your wait could be pretty long. Out of 19 applicants accepted with sub 3.9, only two got their decisions in December.

But it doesn't look good anyways, as 9 of the people with sub 3.9 gpas were URMs. So pretty much, my mid 3.8 means I am fucked.

x_x

WestOfTheRest
Posts: 1412
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby WestOfTheRest » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:08 pm

123kl wrote:
CastleRock wrote:Guys, looking at last years LSN, if you have a gpa below a 3.9 your wait could be pretty long. Out of 19 applicants accepted with sub 3.9, only two got their decisions in December.

But it doesn't look good anyways, as 9 of the people with sub 3.9 gpas were URMs. So pretty much, my mid 3.8 means I am fucked.


What about sub-170 LSATS?

Didn't look because it doesn't apply to me.

But it looks like LSN only has 9 reported sub 170s, and 5 of them are URMs.

Edit: So not really enough data points to make any conclusions. I'd assume that if your <170 you better be praying to a better god than I have been praying to.

User avatar
Weirdlog
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:48 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Weirdlog » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:13 pm

Didn't go UR until 11/17.

Yeah, it's gonna be a while.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”