Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Confused7
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:01 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Confused7 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:49 pm

Thanks so much! I guess I should have more trust in the system....have just been feeling insecure because my stats put me at the borderline and I would have loved to been "complete" earlier in the cycle.

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:33 pm

If this year is like last year, and first acceptances and sent out on the 2nd Friday of December, that would be December 10th this year. So my very very rough countdown:

17 days until possible first acceptances.

User avatar
arism87
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby arism87 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:54 pm

I'm at work so maybe I missed it but scanning through I just wanted to double check: file has been submitted for review = complete right?

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:01 pm

arism87 wrote:I'm at work so maybe I missed it but scanning through I just wanted to double check: file has been submitted for review = complete right?


Well, I think submitted for review = "under review." So yes, you are complete, but then you are a step beyond that (I think).

User avatar
arism87
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby arism87 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:41 pm

Knock wrote:
arism87 wrote:I'm at work so maybe I missed it but scanning through I just wanted to double check: file has been submitted for review = complete right?


Well, I think submitted for review = "under review." So yes, you are complete, but then you are a step beyond that (I think).


Cool thanks!

boyxxx666
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:42 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby boyxxx666 » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:46 am

LawLucy wrote:


Best of luck! Just curious, why are you getting a JD if you already have a MBA?[/quote]

My company paid 100% for it and I drastically increased my gpa...
Type A personality who likes to woop it up quite frequently :wink:[/quote]
HEE HEE u said Golden!!!

boyxxx666
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:42 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby boyxxx666 » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:47 am

LawLucy wrote:


Best of luck! Just curious, why are you getting a JD if you already have a MBA?[/quote]

My company paid 100% for it and I drastically increased my gpa...
Type A personality who likes to woop it up quite frequently :wink:[/quote]
hee hee u said golden...

boyxxx666
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:42 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby boyxxx666 » Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:50 am

arism87 wrote:
Knock wrote:
arism87 wrote:I'm at work so maybe I missed it but scanning through I just wanted to double check: file has been submitted for review = complete right?


Well, I think submitted for review = "under review." So yes, you are complete, but then you are a step beyond that (I think).


Cool thanks!

Holy Smokes based on your profile pic u could get into Yale with a 160 lsat and a 3.5 youre cuteness adds 10pts to lsat and .25 to your gpa ... Juries would luv u!!!

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:00 am

boyxxx666 wrote:
arism87 wrote:
Knock wrote:
arism87 wrote:I'm at work so maybe I missed it but scanning through I just wanted to double check: file has been submitted for review = complete right?


Well, I think submitted for review = "under review." So yes, you are complete, but then you are a step beyond that (I think).


Cool thanks!

Holy Smokes based on your profile pic u could get into Yale with a 160 lsat and a 3.5 youre cuteness adds 10pts to lsat and .25 to your gpa ... Juries would luv u!!!


:x. Learn what an avatar is, ASAP.

User avatar
GOB Bluth
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:22 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby GOB Bluth » Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:02 am

Have we figured out the rest of the faculty committee yet? I've only emailed 3 profs so far and I know there were at least 5 last year. :oops: :cry: :oops: :cry:

User avatar
catsparka
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby catsparka » Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:31 am

GOB Bluth wrote:Have we figured out the rest of the faculty committee yet? I've only emailed 3 profs so far and I know there were at least 5 last year. :oops: :cry: :oops: :cry:


??? Is emailing the members of the faculty committee standard procedure? AM I BEHIND/MISSING SOMETHING

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:05 am

catsparka wrote:
GOB Bluth wrote:Have we figured out the rest of the faculty committee yet? I've only emailed 3 profs so far and I know there were at least 5 last year. :oops: :cry: :oops: :cry:


??? Is emailing the members of the faculty committee standard procedure? AM I BEHIND/MISSING SOMETHING


No, calm down. I think Gob is a 1L/2L at SLS. Probably trying to figure out who SLS's faculty review committee is. Don't worry about it.

User avatar
DieAntwoord
Posts: 250
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:17 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby DieAntwoord » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:06 am

"Holy Smokes based on your profile pic u could get into Yale with a 160 lsat and a 3.5 youre cuteness adds 10pts to lsat and .25 to your gpa ... Juries would luv u!!!"

You wont get into yale with a 170/3.75

User avatar
MartianManhunter
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:59 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby MartianManhunter » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:38 am

Knock wrote:
boyxxx666 wrote:Holy Smokes based on your profile pic u could get into Yale with a 160 lsat and a 3.5 youre cuteness adds 10pts to lsat and .25 to your gpa ... Juries would luv u!!!


:x. Learn what an avatar is, ASAP.


Not to mention it's LiLo. Poor taste in women FTL.

User avatar
arism87
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby arism87 » Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:45 am

MartianManhunter wrote:
Knock wrote:
boyxxx666 wrote:Holy Smokes based on your profile pic u could get into Yale with a 160 lsat and a 3.5 youre cuteness adds 10pts to lsat and .25 to your gpa ... Juries would luv u!!!


:x. Learn what an avatar is, ASAP.


Not to mention it's LiLo. Poor taste in women FTL.


Hahaha hey now. For the record im told I look like her which is why 1. I picked it (not actually a fan) and 2. Will choose to take the compliment anyway.

Although I guess looking like her may or may not be a compliment depending on which of her eras I resemble.. Maybe that's my friends telling me to lay off the coke.. Jk

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:53 am

arism87 wrote:Although I guess looking like her may or may not be a compliment depending on which of her eras I resemble.. Maybe that's my friends telling me to lay off the coke.. Jk


Hey now, looks shouldn't correlation with behavior. It's perfectly fine looking like her as long as you don't act like her.

User avatar
arism87
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby arism87 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:01 pm

r6_philly wrote:
arism87 wrote:Although I guess looking like her may or may not be a compliment depending on which of her eras I resemble.. Maybe that's my friends telling me to lay off the coke.. Jk


Hey now, looks shouldn't correlation with behavior. It's perfectly fine looking like her as long as you don't act like her.


Haha true, but I'd rather look like:

--ImageRemoved--

than

--ImageRemoved--

Just sayin'

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby r6_philly » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:22 pm

You mean fake vs. real? :lol:

I get what you saying though.

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:56 pm

Knock wrote:If this year is like last year, and first acceptances and sent out on the 2nd Friday of December, that would be December 10th this year. So my very very rough countdown:

17 days until possible first acceptances.


14 days until possible first acceptances.

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Sat Nov 27, 2010 5:47 pm

Knock wrote:
Knock wrote:If this year is like last year, and first acceptances and sent out on the 2nd Friday of December, that would be December 10th this year. So my very very rough countdown:

17 days until possible first acceptances.


14 days until possible first acceptances.


13 days until possible first acceptances.

User avatar
GOB Bluth
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:22 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby GOB Bluth » Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:09 pm

Knock wrote:
Knock wrote:
Knock wrote:If this year is like last year, and first acceptances and sent out on the 2nd Friday of December, that would be December 10th this year. So my very very rough countdown:

17 days until possible first acceptances.


14 days until possible first acceptances.


13 days until possible first acceptances.


But we don't know who is on the faculty committee yet?!? I ran out of space on my LOCI name dropping professors, and so now I want to send direct letters to the profs telling them how much I like their research!!!!!!1 :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:14 pm

GOB Bluth wrote:
But we don't know who is on the faculty committee yet?!? I ran out of space on my LOCI name dropping professors, and so now I want to send direct letters to the profs telling them how much I like their research!!!!!!1 :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


:?:

User avatar
GOB Bluth
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:22 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby GOB Bluth » Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:25 pm

Knock wrote:
GOB Bluth wrote:
But we don't know who is on the faculty committee yet?!? I ran out of space on my LOCI name dropping professors, and so now I want to send direct letters to the profs telling them how much I like their research!!!!!!1 :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


:?:


Exactly! We need to figure this out!

User avatar
Knock
Posts: 5152
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby Knock » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:00 pm

GOB Bluth wrote:
Knock wrote:
GOB Bluth wrote:
But we don't know who is on the faculty committee yet?!? I ran out of space on my LOCI name dropping professors, and so now I want to send direct letters to the profs telling them how much I like their research!!!!!!1 :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


:?:


Exactly! We need to figure this out!


Aren't you a 2L?

User avatar
GOB Bluth
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:22 pm

Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)

Postby GOB Bluth » Sat Nov 27, 2010 8:06 pm

Knock wrote:
GOB Bluth wrote:
Knock wrote:
GOB Bluth wrote:
But we don't know who is on the faculty committee yet?!? I ran out of space on my LOCI name dropping professors, and so now I want to send direct letters to the profs telling them how much I like their research!!!!!!1 :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


:?:


Exactly! We need to figure this out!


Aren't you a 2L?


:?:




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cbear2017, Google [Bot], Rich Uncle Skeleton, rizzlebizness, Why???, xnsch and 22 guests