Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics) Forum
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
1st post in this thread.
- src42
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
I just got a call on my work phone from a 650 area code, which I googled really quick, saw it was in Palo Alto, and got REALLY nervous. I answered, and it was a guy from Stanford.
(Suspense)
He's a business student and was looking for data for one of his class projects. Disappointment of the week for sure.
(Suspense)
He's a business student and was looking for data for one of his class projects. Disappointment of the week for sure.
-
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:36 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
That's horrific.src42 wrote:I just got a call on my work phone from a 650 area code, which I googled really quick, saw it was in Palo Alto, and got REALLY nervous. I answered, and it was a guy from Stanford.
(Suspense)
He's a business student and was looking for data for one of his class projects. Disappointment of the week for sure.
- src42
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Yeah, I'm nauseous and dizzy and sweaty. I hate that kid.neonx wrote:That's horrific.src42 wrote:I just got a call on my work phone from a 650 area code, which I googled really quick, saw it was in Palo Alto, and got REALLY nervous. I answered, and it was a guy from Stanford.
(Suspense)
He's a business student and was looking for data for one of his class projects. Disappointment of the week for sure.
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Holy crap, you can't be serious....src42 wrote:Yeah, I'm nauseous and dizzy and sweaty. I hate that kid.neonx wrote:That's horrific.src42 wrote:I just got a call on my work phone from a 650 area code, which I googled really quick, saw it was in Palo Alto, and got REALLY nervous. I answered, and it was a guy from Stanford.
(Suspense)
He's a business student and was looking for data for one of his class projects. Disappointment of the week for sure.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- src42
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Well I certainly didn't give him my data.jrose5 wrote:Holy crap, you can't be serious....src42 wrote:Yeah, I'm nauseous and dizzy and sweaty. I hate that kid.neonx wrote:That's horrific.src42 wrote:I just got a call on my work phone from a 650 area code, which I googled really quick, saw it was in Palo Alto, and got REALLY nervous. I answered, and it was a guy from Stanford.
(Suspense)
He's a business student and was looking for data for one of his class projects. Disappointment of the week for sure.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Lol- Interdisciplinary studies fail. You aren't getting any GSB related admissions points.src42 wrote:Well I certainly didn't give him my data.
- Weirdlog
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:48 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Yeah this is about to become one of those situations where you just try to stay alive for as many days as you can.Knock wrote:Yeah, that's what it looks like from the decision date graph.cardinals1989 wrote:Yeah, probably at the end of March and early April, right?Knock wrote:YesConfused7 wrote:Judging by the graphs in the OP, should we be bracing ourselves for massive spike in DLS in the next few weeks?
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Some advice: Should I add an addendum about why I applied late? I'm a re-applicant and have been very busy this year and was living somewhere with only sporadic internet access. I'd decided to work another year, save money, and apply next year. But then, right before February I had a few days and used that polish my SLS application and send it in. I didn't send an addendum, because I didn't really think it was necessary.
Now I'm wondering if it will look strange that I applied so late when I was a re-applicant?
Now I'm wondering if it will look strange that I applied so late when I was a re-applicant?
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Personally, I wouldn't, it seems kind of unnecessary.Hey-O wrote:Some advice: Should I add an addendum about why I applied late? I'm a re-applicant and have been very busy this year and was living somewhere with only sporadic internet access. I'd decided to work another year, save money, and apply next year. But then, right before February I had a few days and used that polish my SLS application and send it in. I didn't send an addendum, because I didn't really think it was necessary.
Now I'm wondering if it will look strange that I applied so late when I was a re-applicant?
- glitched
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
were you past deadline?Hey-O wrote:Some advice: Should I add an addendum about why I applied late? I'm a re-applicant and have been very busy this year and was living somewhere with only sporadic internet access. I'd decided to work another year, save money, and apply next year. But then, right before February I had a few days and used that polish my SLS application and send it in. I didn't send an addendum, because I didn't really think it was necessary.
Now I'm wondering if it will look strange that I applied so late when I was a re-applicant?
here is dean deal herself in the most recent blog post:
Regarding work, let me tell you about the most aggravating pieces of paper on my desk right now. As you might imagine, we’ve had requests asking to submit late applications. These requests never come in with specific reasons for the late filing – I think these applicants believe we’ll not notice. In any case, staff always reaches out asking for the reasons behind the lateness. And, what do we hear back? “I just decided I want to go to law school in the last few weeks.” “My job opportunity fell through and I find myself with time on my hands.” “I’ve been busy with classes.” “I’ve been down with the flu.” Really? These are not good reasons and you need not worry that any of the people behind these requests are competing with you for seats in the class. I’m waiting for “The dog ate my application.” I have a feeling it’s gonna come one of these days.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
No. I was right at the dead line. I think I'm just freaking out for no reason. I just feel like I'm an autoding and I'm SAAAAD.glitched wrote:were you past deadline?Hey-O wrote:Some advice: Should I add an addendum about why I applied late? I'm a re-applicant and have been very busy this year and was living somewhere with only sporadic internet access. I'd decided to work another year, save money, and apply next year. But then, right before February I had a few days and used that polish my SLS application and send it in. I didn't send an addendum, because I didn't really think it was necessary.
Now I'm wondering if it will look strange that I applied so late when I was a re-applicant?
here is dean deal herself in the most recent blog post:
Regarding work, let me tell you about the most aggravating pieces of paper on my desk right now. As you might imagine, we’ve had requests asking to submit late applications. These requests never come in with specific reasons for the late filing – I think these applicants believe we’ll not notice. In any case, staff always reaches out asking for the reasons behind the lateness. And, what do we hear back? “I just decided I want to go to law school in the last few weeks.” “My job opportunity fell through and I find myself with time on my hands.” “I’ve been busy with classes.” “I’ve been down with the flu.” Really? These are not good reasons and you need not worry that any of the people behind these requests are competing with you for seats in the class. I’m waiting for “The dog ate my application.” I have a feeling it’s gonna come one of these days.
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Don't worry, we're all autodings here.Hey-O wrote:No. I was right at the dead line. I think I'm just freaking out for no reason. I just feel like I'm an autoding and I'm SAAAAD.glitched wrote:were you past deadline?Hey-O wrote:Some advice: Should I add an addendum about why I applied late? I'm a re-applicant and have been very busy this year and was living somewhere with only sporadic internet access. I'd decided to work another year, save money, and apply next year. But then, right before February I had a few days and used that polish my SLS application and send it in. I didn't send an addendum, because I didn't really think it was necessary.
Now I'm wondering if it will look strange that I applied so late when I was a re-applicant?
here is dean deal herself in the most recent blog post:
Regarding work, let me tell you about the most aggravating pieces of paper on my desk right now. As you might imagine, we’ve had requests asking to submit late applications. These requests never come in with specific reasons for the late filing – I think these applicants believe we’ll not notice. In any case, staff always reaches out asking for the reasons behind the lateness. And, what do we hear back? “I just decided I want to go to law school in the last few weeks.” “My job opportunity fell through and I find myself with time on my hands.” “I’ve been busy with classes.” “I’ve been down with the flu.” Really? These are not good reasons and you need not worry that any of the people behind these requests are competing with you for seats in the class. I’m waiting for “The dog ate my application.” I have a feeling it’s gonna come one of these days.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
I was originally looking at January applicants (I applied in January), not January completes (I misspoke in my previous post). I suppose it's the complete date that matters, though. So I'll take this as good news...c_dubya_s wrote:Really? I just looked and found 8 January completes that were accepted, along with 2 February completes.fish52 wrote: Is that how the process works for SLS- several rounds of reviews? I haven't seen much movement among January completes (of which I am one). Then again, looking at last year's data on LSN, only ONE (and s/he was a URM) January complete was accepted.
EDIT: From last year's LSN data, just to be clear.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Yeah, anyone know when was the latest complete acceptance?fish52 wrote:I was originally looking at January applicants (I applied in January), not January completes (I misspoke in my previous post). I suppose it's the complete date that matters, though. So I'll take this as good news...c_dubya_s wrote:Really? I just looked and found 8 January completes that were accepted, along with 2 February completes.fish52 wrote: Is that how the process works for SLS- several rounds of reviews? I haven't seen much movement among January completes (of which I am one). Then again, looking at last year's data on LSN, only ONE (and s/he was a URM) January complete was accepted.
EDIT: From last year's LSN data, just to be clear.
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
There are 2 1/08 submissions, 2/04 completes already accepted to SLS.Hey-O wrote:Yeah, anyone know when was the latest complete acceptance?fish52 wrote:I was originally looking at January applicants (I applied in January), not January completes (I misspoke in my previous post). I suppose it's the complete date that matters, though. So I'll take this as good news...c_dubya_s wrote:Really? I just looked and found 8 January completes that were accepted, along with 2 February completes.fish52 wrote: Is that how the process works for SLS- several rounds of reviews? I haven't seen much movement among January completes (of which I am one). Then again, looking at last year's data on LSN, only ONE (and s/he was a URM) January complete was accepted.
EDIT: From last year's LSN data, just to be clear.
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:33 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
DLS. Complete 1/11.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Silly question but what does DLS stand for? I know what it means, but I don't know what the acronym is. I've been thinking :denied law school. Is that right?
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
"Decision Letter Sent."Hey-O wrote:Silly question but what does DLS stand for? I know what it means, but I don't know what the acronym is. I've been thinking :denied law school. Is that right?
I'm guessing the reason why people view this as a rejection is because an acceptance would be accompanied my a phone call?
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Yep, everyone who gets in will have their DLS status preceded by an acceptance call or email.jrose5 wrote:"Decision Letter Sent."Hey-O wrote:Silly question but what does DLS stand for? I know what it means, but I don't know what the acronym is. I've been thinking :denied law school. Is that right?
I'm guessing the reason why people view this as a rejection is because an acceptance would be accompanied my a phone call?
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
I like denied law school better. I'm going to think of it this way:jrose5 wrote:"Decision Letter Sent."Hey-O wrote:Silly question but what does DLS stand for? I know what it means, but I don't know what the acronym is. I've been thinking :denied law school. Is that right?
I'm guessing the reason why people view this as a rejection is because an acceptance would be accompanied my a phone call?
Denied: Law School!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- GotYourselfAStewGoin
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:16 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
I think it should be:
Denied, (but I can't complain because we are all basically borderline applicants and I still) Love Stanford.
Denied, (but I can't complain because we are all basically borderline applicants and I still) Love Stanford.
- dot
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:13 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Hey-O wrote:I like denied law school better. I'm going to think of it this way:jrose5 wrote:"Decision Letter Sent."Hey-O wrote:Silly question but what does DLS stand for? I know what it means, but I don't know what the acronym is. I've been thinking :denied law school. Is that right?
I'm guessing the reason why people view this as a rejection is because an acceptance would be accompanied my a phone call?
Denied: Law School!
Haha, totally
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:17 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Thought it was fitting-good luck to everyone in the next few weeks:
"The Waiting Place…for people just waiting.
Waiting for a train to go or a bus to come, or a plane to go or the mail to come, or the rain to go or the phone to ring, or the snow to snow or waiting around for a Yes or No or waiting for their hair to grow. Everyone is just waiting.
Waiting for the fish to bite or waiting for wind to fly a kite or waiting around for Friday night or waiting, perhaps, for their Uncle Jake or a pot to boil, or a Better Break or a string of pearls, or a pair of pants or a wig with curls, or Another Chance. Everyone is just waiting.
No! That’s not for you!
Somehow you’ll escape all that waiting and staying. You’ll find the bright places where Boom Bands are playing. With banner flip-flapping, once more you’ll ride high! Ready for anything under the sky. Ready because you’re that kind of a guy!
-Dr. Seuss
"The Waiting Place…for people just waiting.
Waiting for a train to go or a bus to come, or a plane to go or the mail to come, or the rain to go or the phone to ring, or the snow to snow or waiting around for a Yes or No or waiting for their hair to grow. Everyone is just waiting.
Waiting for the fish to bite or waiting for wind to fly a kite or waiting around for Friday night or waiting, perhaps, for their Uncle Jake or a pot to boil, or a Better Break or a string of pearls, or a pair of pants or a wig with curls, or Another Chance. Everyone is just waiting.
No! That’s not for you!
Somehow you’ll escape all that waiting and staying. You’ll find the bright places where Boom Bands are playing. With banner flip-flapping, once more you’ll ride high! Ready for anything under the sky. Ready because you’re that kind of a guy!
-Dr. Seuss
- askyemcdonald
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:53 pm
Re: Stanford Law School 2011 Applicants (Pics)
Good Morning Dean Deal. And good morning to all my fellow TLSers who are waiting....
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login