Page 16 of 41

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:42 pm
by username99
Cardozo w/ $96K or BU/BC with 0?

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:50 pm
by Lord_Roy
And when did you guys apply? I submitted my application 1/12/2011, have a 165 and two superior foreign transcripts and still have not heard from cardozo, which makes me nervous....

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 3:20 pm
by blacklawboss
Lord_Roy wrote:And when did you guys apply? I submitted my application 1/12/2011, have a 165 and two superior foreign transcripts and still have not heard from cardozo, which makes me nervous....
Ur 1/7 in 1/20 via email

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 3:26 pm
by lawgrl21
username99 wrote:Cardozo w/ $96K or BU/BC with 0?
depends if you definitely want to work in NY or not... I personally would go to BU/BC

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 3:27 pm
by Lord_Roy
blacklawboss wrote:
Lord_Roy wrote:And when did you guys apply? I submitted my application 1/12/2011, have a 165 and two superior foreign transcripts and still have not heard from cardozo, which makes me nervous....
Ur 1/7 in 1/20 via email
Damn...I've got a bad feeling about this...

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 4:41 pm
by aidez-moi
lawgrl21 wrote:
username99 wrote:Cardozo w/ $96K or BU/BC with 0?
depends if you definitely want to work in NY or not... I personally would go to BU/BC
This. Although I personally would go to and am attending Cardozo.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:24 pm
by lawgrl21
aidez-moi wrote:
lawgrl21 wrote:
username99 wrote:Cardozo w/ $96K or BU/BC with 0?
depends if you definitely want to work in NY or not... I personally would go to BU/BC
This. Although I personally would go to and am attending Cardozo.

Just to clarify ... if you definitely want NYC market, I would go to Cardozo and be at the top of your class. There are plenty of biglaw jobs to be had there. If you aren't set on NY, then I think I would pay sticker to go to BU/BC where a much higher percent of students are getting top jobs. Also, it kind of depends of debt aversive you are.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:36 pm
by Loyola Trojan
Hey,

Just out of curiosity, for those that have received some sort of scholarship, besides telling us your reward amount, can you tell us your numbers so we have some sort of gauge their requirements.

Thanks a lot, and congrats again to all the admits!!
Anyone set on going for sure?

I'm 50/50, still waiting to hear back from a majority of my west coast schools.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 7:55 pm
by funhouse3
Loyola Trojan wrote:Hey,

Just out of curiosity, for those that have received some sort of scholarship, besides telling us your reward amount, can you tell us your numbers so we have some sort of gauge their requirements.

Thanks a lot, and congrats again to all the admits!!
Anyone set on going for sure?

I'm 50/50, still waiting to hear back from a majority of my west coast schools.
167/3.7 - full ride. good chance i am going - hard to turn that money down.
also i heard nothing about scholarship info on the phone, so just because they don't mention it doesn't mean you get nothing.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 7:58 pm
by rocon7383
DJsm20 wrote:
rocon7383 wrote:
blacklawboss wrote:
Art + Law wrote:I received the voicemail yesterday and I am definitely asking for travel subsidy for the Sneak Peak on the 21st. I got accepted with 3.65/155 and a strong résumé, any of you have similar numbers and was able to get scholarship?
3.3 156 Urm and super strong resume and softs. 84k for 3 years
3.2 166 and was held. Color me confused.

3.4/167 and held
What the hell?

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:48 pm
by kruiz88
.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:57 pm
by rocon7383
kruiz88 wrote:$108,000 as a gates scholar.
stats?

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:00 pm
by sabenser
rocon7383 wrote:
kruiz88 wrote:$108,000 as a gates scholar.
stats?
163/3.9 - Click his/her profile for stats

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:01 pm
by kruiz88
.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:15 pm
by rocon7383
It seems like Cardozo seems to have two objectives this cycle- accept high GPAs and attract URMs. LSAT scores seem to be not as important based on the 0Ls on this forum.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:26 pm
by PinkCow
Sorry to be joining super late y'all.
169 3.55ish

Still under review 1/7 :?

???

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:31 pm
by rocon7383
PinkCow wrote:Sorry to be joining super late y'all.
169 3.55ish

Still under review 1/7 :?

???
Based on this forum I'd guess full ride

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:41 pm
by PinkCow
rocon7383 wrote:
PinkCow wrote:Sorry to be joining super late y'all.
169 3.55ish

Still under review 1/7 :?

???
Based on this forum I'd guess full ride

That would be quite swell. I was actually just wondering if still being IR for over a month is a bad/good/whatever sign?

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:47 pm
by Woods, Elle
rocon7383 wrote:It seems like Cardozo seems to have two objectives this cycle- accept high GPAs and attract URMs. LSAT scores seem to be not as important based on the 0Ls on this forum.

Eh, I guess I'm the exception. 3.43/164 and judging from here and LSN, I was in the first batch of acceptances (in 1/4).

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:54 pm
by rocon7383
Woods, Elle wrote:
rocon7383 wrote:It seems like Cardozo seems to have two objectives this cycle- accept high GPAs and attract URMs. LSAT scores seem to be not as important based on the 0Ls on this forum.

Eh, I guess I'm the exception. 3.43/164 and judging from here and LSN, I was in the first batch of acceptances (in 1/4).
I was held at nearly the exact time with 3.2/166. Oh well.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:58 pm
by ilovesf
rocon7383 wrote:It seems like Cardozo seems to have two objectives this cycle- accept high GPAs and attract URMs. LSAT scores seem to be not as important based on the 0Ls on this forum.
Nah. 165, 3.3 here, 20,000 per year. Not exactly a high GPA.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:05 am
by rocon7383
ilovesf wrote:
rocon7383 wrote:It seems like Cardozo seems to have two objectives this cycle- accept high GPAs and attract URMs. LSAT scores seem to be not as important based on the 0Ls on this forum.
Nah. 165, 3.3 here, 20,000 per year. Not exactly a high GPA.
Man... I'm perplexed. I could see if you had great softs you getting in over my 166 3.2, I guess my confusion comes in when you get a sizable scholarship and I simply get held.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:16 am
by ilovesf
rocon7383 wrote:
Man... I'm perplexed. I could see if you had great softs you getting in over my 166 3.2, I guess my confusion comes in when you get a sizable scholarship and I simply get held.
My softs are okay but not great by any standards. If you are really interested you can PM me and I'll tell you.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:23 am
by rocon7383
ilovesf wrote:
rocon7383 wrote:
Man... I'm perplexed. I could see if you had great softs you getting in over my 166 3.2, I guess my confusion comes in when you get a sizable scholarship and I simply get held.
My softs are okay but not great by any standards. If you are really interested you can PM me and I'll tell you.
I apologize for the wording of my statement by the way, I didn't want to make it seem like you would NEED great softs to get in over me. You getting in over me is not odd at all, I'm simply confused as to what makes their adcomms give you 20k and me a hold.

Re: Cardozo 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:28 am
by ilovesf
rocon7383 wrote: I apologize for the wording of my statement by the way, I didn't want to make it seem like you would NEED great softs to get in over me. You getting in over me is not odd at all, I'm simply confused as to what makes their adcomms give you 20k and me a hold.
No worries, I wasn't offended :) Maybe your app is just so amazing you are being YP'd.