No, a high GPA doesn't guarantee you anything at S or B (or anywhere else, for that matter). A low GPA will doom you though, and it'll do so faster at S and B than most other schools. S and B are only holistic if you already meet their numerical standards.bdubs wrote:Stanford and Berkeley are some of the only schools that don't seem to be formulaic, I wasn't suggesting that they don't care about GPAs.splitmuch wrote:Yeah this confused me too. Certainly they are holistic, but they restrict those holistic looks to those that mean very strident (and IMO dumb) GPA guidelines.bdubs wrote:Wait, is your point here that Stanford and Berkeley are more forgiving when it comes to low GPA's?Justathought wrote:
Wasn't a comment about your school or major. Just that if you know you want to go to law school it is easy to game the admissions system, whereas those who weren't planning for a career in the law probably chose classes much more pragmatically and didn't fret as much over the difference between an A and A- are now forced to compensate.
The system is what it is, but doesn't have to be that way. See Stanford and Berkeley.
Although a high GPA doesn't seem to guarantee you anything at S (not so sure about B since I didn't really look into it very hard).
WUSTL 2011 Cycle Forum
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
From SLS admissions viewbook: GPA range 3.29-4.18Magnolia wrote: No, a high GPA doesn't guarantee you anything at S or B (or anywhere else, for that matter). A low GPA will doom you though, and it'll do so faster at S and B than most other schools. S and B are only holistic if you already meet their numerical standards.
I wouldn't say that 3.29 is overly stringent for a school that is in the top 3. Harvard probably wouldn't let in a 3.29.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:52 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Every school is holistic to a point. I bet someone like Mark Zuckerberg could get into HYS with a 3.2 and 168 LSAT.bdubs wrote:From SLS admissions viewbook: GPA range 3.29-4.18Magnolia wrote: No, a high GPA doesn't guarantee you anything at S or B (or anywhere else, for that matter). A low GPA will doom you though, and it'll do so faster at S and B than most other schools. S and B are only holistic if you already meet their numerical standards.
I wouldn't say that 3.29 is overly stringent for a school that is in the top 3. Harvard probably wouldn't let in a 3.29.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I wouldn't take that too seriously. Because of St. Louis' specific geography, it artificially inflates the murder rate. It's an old city, and the city limits are drawn abnormally small. There's some pretty bad swaths that aren't averaged out by the outlying areas that other cities have, IOW. St. Louis has a TON of suburbs...I think around 70 or so. They're all relatively close in, and consist of low-murder areas that would be normally counted as part of the city anywhere else...averaging out the rate. There are definitely bad areas, but the school is in a pretty decent neighborhood, University City is pretty heavily patrolled, and so is the Central West End. The really bad areas are on the north side, and there's no reason you'd have to ever go through there.kblueboi wrote:http://www.faqs.org/shareranks/994,High ... -US-Citieskk19131 wrote:Is St. Louis a fun place to be a student?
just saying ...
There's people out jogging, biking, walking, shopping and drinking all day and all night in the WUSTL neighborhood and surrounding areas. The media's portrayal of St. Louis really irritates me (that and the fact that they don't have any idea how to analyze statistics). Overall, it's really no different from any other big city. There are some good areas, there are some bad areas.
- Justathought
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:16 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I don't know if he graduated, but I assume all he'd need is a B.A. and a library.tinlawman wrote:Every school is holistic to a point. I bet someone like Mark Zuckerberg could get into HYS with a 3.2 and 168 LSAT.bdubs wrote:From SLS admissions viewbook: GPA range 3.29-4.18Magnolia wrote: No, a high GPA doesn't guarantee you anything at S or B (or anywhere else, for that matter). A low GPA will doom you though, and it'll do so faster at S and B than most other schools. S and B are only holistic if you already meet their numerical standards.
I wouldn't say that 3.29 is overly stringent for a school that is in the top 3. Harvard probably wouldn't let in a 3.29.
In this economy, perhaps just some guaranteed 1L summer internships.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Exactly. Chances are very high that the applicant with the 3.29 was a URM or spent 10 years doing charity work, cured cancer, etc. That person is going to get in whether or not a school is "holistic". The test is whether your average applicant with a 3.29 stands any chance at getting in, and they don't, especially at Berkeley and Stanford.tinlawman wrote:Every school is holistic to a point. I bet someone like Mark Zuckerberg could get into HYS with a 3.2 and 168 LSAT.bdubs wrote:From SLS admissions viewbook: GPA range 3.29-4.18Magnolia wrote: No, a high GPA doesn't guarantee you anything at S or B (or anywhere else, for that matter). A low GPA will doom you though, and it'll do so faster at S and B than most other schools. S and B are only holistic if you already meet their numerical standards.
I wouldn't say that 3.29 is overly stringent for a school that is in the top 3. Harvard probably wouldn't let in a 3.29.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
"Average" applicants with mediocre GPAs or GMATs also have no shot of getting into top MBA programs. You should have great qualities to get into top programs in any field.Magnolia wrote:Exactly. Chances are very high that the applicant with the 3.29 was a URM or spent 10 years doing charity work, cured cancer, etc. That person is going to get in whether or not a school is "holistic". The test is whether your average applicant with a 3.29 stands any chance at getting in, and they don't, especially at Berkeley and Stanford.tinlawman wrote:Every school is holistic to a point. I bet someone like Mark Zuckerberg could get into HYS with a 3.2 and 168 LSAT.bdubs wrote:From SLS admissions viewbook: GPA range 3.29-4.18Magnolia wrote: No, a high GPA doesn't guarantee you anything at S or B (or anywhere else, for that matter). A low GPA will doom you though, and it'll do so faster at S and B than most other schools. S and B are only holistic if you already meet their numerical standards.
I wouldn't say that 3.29 is overly stringent for a school that is in the top 3. Harvard probably wouldn't let in a 3.29.
I was just commenting that the blind GPA loving of law schools is ridiculous. A lot of times good to great softs won't overcome a "mediocre" GPA. This is not true in most other application processes.
Last edited by bdubs on Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Also, to whoever is attending the last admitted students weekend...they just got done waxing and polishing all the tile floors for you. I almost couldn't make it to my locker last night because the floor was cordoned off. I had to tiptoe across some semi-dry wax to put my computer away...all for you precious 0Ls...who are getting showered with scholarship money and will have the best OCI in years. It's spring break now so they thought everyone was gone (it was 1am). But I have some catching up to do and I study better at night.
- Hannibal
- Posts: 2211
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:00 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Not sure if I should be happy or apologize.JCougar wrote:Also, to whoever is attending the last admitted students weekend...they just got done waxing and polishing all the tile floors for you. I almost couldn't make it to my locker last night because the floor was cordoned off. I had to tiptoe across some semi-dry wax to put my computer away...all for you precious 0Ls...who are getting showered with scholarship money and will have the best OCI in years. It's spring break now so they thought everyone was gone (it was 1am). But I have some catching up to do and I study better at night.
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I agree with you. I just think that a school like NU would be a better example of a school that is willing to overlook low GPA's than schools like S or B, which are notorious GPA whores, despite their claims to the contrary.bdubs wrote:I was just commenting that the blind GPA loving of law schools is ridiculous. A lot of times good to great softs won't overcome a "mediocre" GPA. This is not true in most other application processes.
- mez06
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:11 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
When's the deadline date for them to notify students being considered for RD? Are they going to get back to us before April 1!?
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
It's all good. If the emerging admissions profile holds up, you guys will be the most competitive class ever admissions-wise. And then our future reputation will be staked to you...to improve it for the next cycle of kids coming through here. We aim to leave USC in the dust.Hannibal wrote:Not sure if I should be happy or apologize.JCougar wrote:Also, to whoever is attending the last admitted students weekend...they just got done waxing and polishing all the tile floors for you. I almost couldn't make it to my locker last night because the floor was cordoned off. I had to tiptoe across some semi-dry wax to put my computer away...all for you precious 0Ls...who are getting showered with scholarship money and will have the best OCI in years. It's spring break now so they thought everyone was gone (it was 1am). But I have some catching up to do and I study better at night.
Last edited by JCougar on Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- law4vus
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Wondering the same thing. If the last ASW is on the 25th, then you'd think they'd get back to us before then.mez06 wrote:When's the deadline date for them to notify students being considered for RD? Are they going to get back to us before April 1!?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TatteredDignity
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:06 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Their website says April 15th.mez06 wrote:When's the deadline date for them to notify students being considered for RD? Are they going to get back to us before April 1!?
http://law.wustl.edu/admissions/pages.aspx?id=51
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
- ScrabbleChamp
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:09 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Nope... happened to me, too. IR 3/11 ---> 3/14. If I'm not mistaken, the writing just stated something to the effect that your application is complete and when it goes IR, the date may change several times but the changes do not signify anything other than it being reviewed by another party/committee/whathaveyou.columbia86 wrote:The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
- jacketman03
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Yeah, I just noticed that the writing disappeared from mine at some point, too. My IR dates were 2/10--->3/3.ScrabbleChamp wrote:Nope... happened to me, too. IR 3/11 ---> 3/14. If I'm not mistaken, the writing just stated something to the effect that your application is complete and when it goes IR, the date may change several times but the changes do not signify anything other than it being reviewed by another party/committee/whathaveyou.columbia86 wrote:The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Well considering that we are 167 splitters or below, this may not bode well. Obviously three is an unreliably small sample size, but...jacketman03 wrote:Yeah, I just noticed that the writing disappeared from mine at some point, too. My IR dates were 2/10--->3/3.ScrabbleChamp wrote:Nope... happened to me, too. IR 3/11 ---> 3/14. If I'm not mistaken, the writing just stated something to the effect that your application is complete and when it goes IR, the date may change several times but the changes do not signify anything other than it being reviewed by another party/committee/whathaveyou.columbia86 wrote:The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
Last edited by columbia86 on Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jacketman03
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I'm URM, though. Don't know how much that will help me, but I'm guessing not much.columbia86 wrote:Well considering that we are 167 splitters or below, this may not bode well.jacketman03 wrote:Yeah, I just noticed that the writing disappeared from mine at some point, too. My IR dates were 2/10--->3/3.ScrabbleChamp wrote:Nope... happened to me, too. IR 3/11 ---> 3/14. If I'm not mistaken, the writing just stated something to the effect that your application is complete and when it goes IR, the date may change several times but the changes do not signify anything other than it being reviewed by another party/committee/whathaveyou.columbia86 wrote:The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
When I went in to talk to the dean of admissions [she was great, actually], it was obvious that she was having a difficult time trying to say "sorry buddy" without simply giving me the decision. I asked her about the writing being gone, just for funzies, and she did the same dance between not-answering the question and pitying reassurance.
So, I'm inclined to believe that the writing disappearing = waitlist/deny
Infinite sad face.
So, I'm inclined to believe that the writing disappearing = waitlist/deny
Infinite sad face.
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Stats?anti-phronimos wrote:When I went in to talk to the dean of admissions [she was great, actually], it was obvious that she was having a difficult time trying to say "sorry buddy" without simply giving me the decision. I asked her about the writing being gone, just for funzies, and she did the same dance between not-answering the question and pitying reassurance.
So, I'm inclined to believe that the writing disappearing = waitlist/deny
Infinite sad face.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
columbia86 wrote:The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
What writing is everyone talking about???
My still looks normal?! I was IR 3/15.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
3.7ish, 166--URM. Other circumstances might make me less appealing to WUSTL--I'm from St. Louis, went to a university in the area that they don't respect, etc.columbia86 wrote:Stats?anti-phronimos wrote:When I went in to talk to the dean of admissions [she was great, actually], it was obvious that she was having a difficult time trying to say "sorry buddy" without simply giving me the decision. I asked her about the writing being gone, just for funzies, and she did the same dance between not-answering the question and pitying reassurance.
So, I'm inclined to believe that the writing disappearing = waitlist/deny
Infinite sad face.
-
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
columbia86 wrote:Stats?anti-phronimos wrote:When I went in to talk to the dean of admissions [she was great, actually], it was obvious that she was having a difficult time trying to say "sorry buddy" without simply giving me the decision. I asked her about the writing being gone, just for funzies, and she did the same dance between not-answering the question and pitying reassurance.
So, I'm inclined to believe that the writing disappearing = waitlist/deny
Infinite sad face.
167/3.4
- ArthurDigbySellers
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
3/15 here too. Well what is it WUSTL? Yay or nay?SrLaw wrote:columbia86 wrote:The writing has disappeared from the top of my status checker, does that signify something about my admission prospects? (In Review 3/15)
What writing is everyone talking about???
My still looks normal?! I was IR 3/15.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login