WUSTL 2011 Cycle Forum
- betsyclaire
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:16 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Just wondering, if you are not applying for the Webster Society, what is the highest level scholarship that WUSTL is giving out this year? 135k, or do they have a guaranteed full tuition scholarship like IU Bloomington? Anyone know?
-
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Wouldn't 135k be full tuition?betsyclaire wrote:Just wondering, if you are not applying for the Webster Society, what is the highest level scholarship that WUSTL is giving out this year? 135k, or do they have a guaranteed full tuition scholarship like IU Bloomington? Anyone know?
-
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:40 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I started this thread back in October. I have yet to have my application reviewed by Wash U. This is just ridiculous. That's 5 months. Should I call or email them and say what's up? Or just let it go?
- Perch
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:36 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I would call and tell them you started the thread.username99 wrote:I started this thread back in October. I have yet to have my application reviewed by Wash U. This is just ridiculous. That's 5 months. Should I call or email them and say what's up? Or just let it go?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
+1Perch wrote:I would call and tell them you started the thread.username99 wrote:I started this thread back in October. I have yet to have my application reviewed by Wash U. This is just ridiculous. That's 5 months. Should I call or email them and say what's up? Or just let it go?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KingRajesh
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:39 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
WashU just needs to hurry up and hit me with the ding. Applied in November, In review for 2 months...
I know it's coming.
I know it's coming.
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Submitted in early december. Still no UR. If it gets to later in March, I'm going to be super pissedusername99 wrote:I started this thread back in October. I have yet to have my application reviewed by Wash U. This is just ridiculous. That's 5 months. Should I call or email them and say what's up? Or just let it go?
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
applied end of october. this is getting ridiculous.
- simontemplar
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:28 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Admitted today! Does any scholarship offer typically come in the admission email? THanks!
- inchristalone
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 10:45 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
No, it comes later.simontemplar wrote:Admitted today! Does any scholarship offer typically come in the admission email? THanks!
Has anyone heard about the Webster Society schollies yet? Do we even know if they're reviewing those essays yet?
- soccerfreak
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:57 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Right now it would be, but assuming they raise the tuition each year, it might not be a couple years from now.Arbiter213 wrote:Wouldn't 135k be full tuition?betsyclaire wrote:Just wondering, if you are not applying for the Webster Society, what is the highest level scholarship that WUSTL is giving out this year? 135k, or do they have a guaranteed full tuition scholarship like IU Bloomington? Anyone know?
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:45 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I only applied to WashU because my pre-law advisor thought that I'd get really good money there. I also applied in October... 5 months without even looking at an application is unacceptable. I might be totally off-base, but I think it could be indicative of how the administration treats students. There's basically nothing WashU could do at this point to make me want to go there.username99 wrote:I started this thread back in October. I have yet to have my application reviewed by Wash U. This is just ridiculous. That's 5 months. Should I call or email them and say what's up? Or just let it go?
/rant. Calling probably won't make you get reviewed any faster. But I'd be interested to see if they'll admit it's because you have a sub-168!
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Chill out, broski. I understand you are frustrated, but WUSTL probably has one of the nicest admissions offices in the country. Everyone from the deans to the staff is willing to bend over backwards for our students. Ask anyone who has attended an ASW or gone on a visit, and I'm sure they will agree. Our admissions peeps are great folks, so don't bash them. Also, you should have known WUSTL has no rolling admissions system, so I dunno why you're so shocked. And who chooses a school based on the admissions office?RTFM wrote:I only applied to WashU because my pre-law advisor thought that I'd get really good money there. I also applied in October... 5 months without even looking at an application is unacceptable. I might be totally off-base, but I think it could be indicative of how the administration treats students. There's basically nothing WashU could do at this point to make me want to go there.
/rant. Calling probably won't make you get reviewed any faster. But I'd be interested to see if they'll admit it's because you have a sub-168!
I understand everyone gets frustrated, and I know a lot of you have been waiting for a while. But WUSTL has a system of choosing applicants that can take a long time for some people, and you just have to sit tight and be patient. I know it sucks, trust me I do. But they didn't lose your file, and they aren't just doing this out of pleasure. It is simply how their system works.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
When did you go in review?simontemplar wrote:Admitted today! Does any scholarship offer typically come in the admission email? THanks!
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:41 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I was told by Admissions that "the Webster Society Scholarship is not usually determined until late March or April."inchristalone wrote:Has anyone heard about the Webster Society schollies yet? Do we even know if they're reviewing those essays yet?
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:45 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
They were never that high on my list to begin with. And we could debate the usefulness of the LSAT for hours, but I don't really want to go to a school that only cares about my LSAT score. I'm getting into better schools with my (not very) crappy score.romothesavior wrote: And who chooses a school based on the admissions office?
- FuManChusco
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
congrats dude, but I think you have a very ignorant view of WUSTL.RTFM wrote:They were never that high on my list to begin with. And we could debate the usefulness of the LSAT for hours, but I don't really want to go to a school that only cares about my LSAT score. I'm getting into better schools with my (not very) crappy score.romothesavior wrote: And who chooses a school based on the admissions office?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:45 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
edit: Look, I'm not intending to be a douche and I'm sorry if I offended. But WashU has the clearest LSAT wall out of any school--if you have under a 3.8/167 they are not looking at your application right now, unless you are URM. Similar schools that I applied to at the exact same time looked past my numbers, and I personally appreciate that.FuManChusco wrote:congrats dude, but I think you have a very ignorant view of WUSTL.RTFM wrote:They were never that high on my list to begin with. And we could debate the usefulness of the LSAT for hours, but I don't really want to go to a school that only cares about my LSAT score. I'm getting into better schools with my (not very) crappy score.romothesavior wrote: And who chooses a school based on the admissions office?
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:05 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
uh... can't you say the same thing about almost every T20 school?RTFM wrote:edit: Look, I'm not intending to be a douche and I'm sorry if I offended. But WashU has the clearest LSAT wall out of any school--if you have under a 3.8/167 they are not looking at your application right now, unless you are URM. Similar schools that I applied to at the exact same time looked past my numbers, and I personally appreciate that.FuManChusco wrote:congrats dude, but I think you have a very ignorant view of WUSTL.RTFM wrote:They were never that high on my list to begin with. And we could debate the usefulness of the LSAT for hours, but I don't really want to go to a school that only cares about my LSAT score. I'm getting into better schools with my (not very) crappy score.romothesavior wrote: And who chooses a school based on the admissions office?
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
They probably didn't look past your numbers as much as you think. A lot of schools simply have a weighted algorithm where they plug in your GPA and LSAT score and out pops an index number. It makes it seem like the school "considers everything," but really all they care about is the numbers.RTFM wrote: edit: Look, I'm not intending to be a douche and I'm sorry if I offended. But WashU has the clearest LSAT wall out of any school--if you have under a 3.8/167 they are not looking at your application right now, unless you are URM. Similar schools that I applied to at the exact same time looked past my numbers, and I personally appreciate that.
Any school that gets 5,000 applications a year doesn't have time to read 10,000 letters of recommendation (all of which say "this is the smartest, best applicant evar") and pick out people with slightly more praising letters and actually have that mean that you're a better applicant. Then they have to read 5,000 personal statements, half of which have been professionally edited by someone else...
Numbers at all schools are probably about 85% of the decision. Softs help you only if you are on the fence (unless you are some very exceptional case). Some schools decide to weight one number more than the other. With WUSTL, they like LSAT, because it's easier to sell their class to prospective employers (and it's a better predictor of law school success).
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
+1 to jcougar. Soft factors are just that: they're soft. For 90%+ of people, softs don't make up for your GPA/LSAT. They certainly do their best to take a variety of factors into account, but at the same time, WUSTL has a very systematic way of going through applicants. They certainly try to look at people's experiences, LORs, addendums, etc., but they have so much volume, they have to use numbers to differentiate. They like the LSAT. IMO, BFD. We still have a 3.7 GPA median, so obviously we aren't that LSAT-oriented.
Plenty of people will get in with sub-168/3.8. They just typically come later in the game, that's all. I wouldn't be surprised if WUSTL is very consciously trying to raise the LSAT median this year, so I don't think this should come as a surprise to anybody. I personally am not a fan of the non-rolling admissions so I feel everybody's pain, but it is what it is, so just be patient. Last year, a lot of people were freaking out and getting mad too, but then they got an acceptance and scholarship and all that frustration floated away.
Plenty of people will get in with sub-168/3.8. They just typically come later in the game, that's all. I wouldn't be surprised if WUSTL is very consciously trying to raise the LSAT median this year, so I don't think this should come as a surprise to anybody. I personally am not a fan of the non-rolling admissions so I feel everybody's pain, but it is what it is, so just be patient. Last year, a lot of people were freaking out and getting mad too, but then they got an acceptance and scholarship and all that frustration floated away.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chrisbru
- Posts: 4251
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:44 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
In this case, your honor, intent is not the issue. All evidence points to the result, which is, of course...RTFM wrote:
edit: Look, I'm not intending to be a douche and I'm sorry if I offended. But WashU has the clearest LSAT wall out of any school--if you have under a 3.8/167 they are not looking at your application right now, unless you are URM. Similar schools that I applied to at the exact same time looked past my numbers, and I personally appreciate that.
douche.
Just get out of this thread that's intended to be helpful to people that WANT to go to WUSTL, and enjoy having your JD churned out from Georgetown or one of the other "better" schools you went to. The midwest wouldn't appreciate your pretentiousness anyway.
- kk19131
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:08 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
So, does Wash U offer need-based aid? What was the point of that aid application?
-
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:27 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
kk19131 wrote:So, does Wash U offer need-based aid? What was the point of that aid application?
Institutional loans I think
- ktg808
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:07 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Congrats! is SMU still high on your list?simontemplar wrote:Admitted today! Does any scholarship offer typically come in the admission email? THanks!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login