That would be a correct interpretation if the quoted part was missing "for the next round of admit calls" as yours does. But in reality it does not, making the thing that we are keeping our eyes on the phone for, without ambiguity, admit calls.Knock wrote:
The office is closed on Monday [so don't expect anything on Monday], but keep your eyes on the phones [We'll give you a little bit of good news to compensate for the bad news, and to let you know that the next wave will be coming early next week, instead of waiting for another Monday].
Harvard 2011 Applicants Forum
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Nulli Secundus wrote:That would be a correct interpretation if the quoted part was missing "for the next round of admit calls" as yours does. But in reality it does not, making the thing that we are keeping our eyes on the phone for, without ambiguity, admit calls.Knock wrote:
The office is closed on Monday [so don't expect anything on Monday], but keep your eyes on the phones [We'll give you a little bit of good news to compensate for the bad news, and to let you know that the next wave will be coming early next week, instead of waiting for another Monday].
- LinzerTorte
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:06 am
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Clearly there needs to be a new round of JR1s if only so that the nonsense in this thread will stop.
- angua
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Judging by recent evidence, the tweet meant "heads up, we're calling today"
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
JR2 about 15 minutes ago!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Wham! Gratz!lsa2011 wrote:JR2 about 15 minutes ago!
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Movement! Congrats!!!lsa2011 wrote:JR2 about 15 minutes ago!
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
recent evidence? has there been more movement not reported on this board?angua wrote:Judging by recent evidence, the tweet meant "heads up, we're calling today"
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:07 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Congrats! Did JR call you from a diff. number? What did he say to you?lsa2011 wrote:JR2 about 15 minutes ago!
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Yeah, it was a 603 area code. Kinda threw me off. Basically that I was in, and they'd be sending me an email and such shortly!misspoopers wrote:Congrats! Did JR call you from a diff. number? What did he say to you?lsa2011 wrote:JR2 about 15 minutes ago!
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:52 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
603 is New Hammie. Say whaaaaaa?lsa2011 wrote:Yeah, it was a 603 area code. Kinda threw me off. Basically that I was in, and they'd be sending me an email and such shortly!misspoopers wrote:Congrats! Did JR call you from a diff. number? What did he say to you?lsa2011 wrote:JR2 about 15 minutes ago!
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:21 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
President's Day Weekend ski trip?shoop wrote: 603 is New Hammie. Say whaaaaaa?
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:52 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
You registered on TLS just to speculate on JR's holiday recreation habits?birkenstockmarket wrote:President's Day Weekend ski trip?shoop wrote: 603 is New Hammie. Say whaaaaaa?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:07 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
no other movement on JR2s, not even on LSN
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
This worries me a bit...misspoopers wrote:no other movement on JR2s, not even on LSN
Edit: This worries me a lot. Let's face it, it can be fun to screw with people when you're on the outside: http://www.dontevenreply.com/view.php?post=101
Last edited by thecynic69 on Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Any updates today for people who had Jr1s last week?
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:07 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
none from me. sadly.whytheface wrote:Any updates today for people who had Jr1s last week?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:21 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
shoop wrote:You registered on TLS just to speculate on JR's holiday recreation habits?birkenstockmarket wrote:President's Day Weekend ski trip?shoop wrote: 603 is New Hammie. Say whaaaaaa?
No, I registered on TLS because I'm in the middle of applying to law schools and have been reading a this board and decide I'd rather participate in the community than just observe it.
Though yea, it was kind of weird to kick off my time here with speculation about outdoor adventure.
- misterbingley
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
If JR is indeed making calls today, then let's hope that he goes until past 5!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:05 am
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Just got my JR2 30 minutes ago.
JR called from 603 number. He congratulated me and talked about the package that will be sent.
I did my interview on 8th or 9th of Feb.
LSAT one cancelled, then 178(December) GPA 3.95
Good luck to you all!!
JR called from 603 number. He congratulated me and talked about the package that will be sent.
I did my interview on 8th or 9th of Feb.
LSAT one cancelled, then 178(December) GPA 3.95
Good luck to you all!!
- misterbingley
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
That's 2 now. That's confirmation (for me anyway) that JR is working. Good thing a sentence like that tweet did not show up on the LSAT because I was in the wrong camp.
Then again, I was also one of the people who insisted that the June journalist LG was ambiguous...
Then again, I was also one of the people who insisted that the June journalist LG was ambiguous...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- law_monkey
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Haha I liked that game. I was one of the people who panicked over the mulch game, which of course was actually fairly easy and if I hadn't panicked I would be in a much different situation right now (as in not JR1-less).misterbingley wrote:That's 2 now. That's confirmation (for me anyway) that JR is working. Good thing a sentence like that tweet did not show up on the LSAT because I was in the wrong camp.
Then again, I was also one of the people who insisted that the June journalist LG was ambiguous...
Oh and CONGRATS NEW JR2 PEOPLE!!!!!
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Well I'm jr1-less, and I didn't panick. You have no idea where you would be, let's be honest. No point kicking yourself with could-of, would-of, should-of.law_monkey wrote:Haha I liked that game. I was one of the people who panicked over the mulch game, which of course was actually fairly easy and if I hadn't panicked I would be in a much different situation right now (as in not JR1-less).misterbingley wrote:That's 2 now. That's confirmation (for me anyway) that JR is working. Good thing a sentence like that tweet did not show up on the LSAT because I was in the wrong camp.
Then again, I was also one of the people who insisted that the June journalist LG was ambiguous...
Oh and CONGRATS NEW JR2 PEOPLE!!!!!
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
I'm going to assume that our group will need to wait until next week... Trying to be optimisticmisspoopers wrote:none from me. sadly.whytheface wrote:Any updates today for people who had Jr1s last week?
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2011 Applicants
Credited. Some wise words from Castlerock here.CastleRock wrote:Well I'm jr1-less, and I didn't panick. You have no idea where you would be, let's be honest. No point kicking yourself with could-of, would-of, should-of.law_monkey wrote:Haha I liked that game. I was one of the people who panicked over the mulch game, which of course was actually fairly easy and if I hadn't panicked I would be in a much different situation right now (as in not JR1-less).misterbingley wrote:That's 2 now. That's confirmation (for me anyway) that JR is working. Good thing a sentence like that tweet did not show up on the LSAT because I was in the wrong camp.
Then again, I was also one of the people who insisted that the June journalist LG was ambiguous...
Oh and CONGRATS NEW JR2 PEOPLE!!!!!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login