Fordham 2011

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
SemperLegal
Posts: 1333
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:28 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby SemperLegal » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:45 pm

Gotti wrote:When did you submit your app?


Submitted in late October, but it did not go Complete till November 1 which was when they received my LSAT. Went UR at the end of that month and decision rendered on that Friday.

When I reread my last posting it seems a little confusing. I was saying it still said UR as of about an hour before the decision. I have no proof it didn't go Complete-->UR-->Complete, but I highly doubt it

User avatar
nightman09
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:40 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby nightman09 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:30 am

Sent in my application 11/2, UR on 11/29, but when I looked back today (12/8) it only says "Application is complete" ... is this potentially a bad sign, or just a glitch in the system? :?

User avatar
Eugenie Danglars
Posts: 2353
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby Eugenie Danglars » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:31 am

nightman09 wrote:Sent in my application 11/2, UR on 11/29, but when I looked back today (12/8) it only says "Application is complete" ... is this potentially a bad sign, or just a glitch in the system? :?


It's happened to a bunch of people with a variety of stats over the last couple days. If it means anything, we don't know what yet :-)

User avatar
nightman09
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:40 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby nightman09 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:48 am

It's happened to a bunch of people with a variety of stats over the last couple days. If it means anything, we don't know what yet


Well, hopefully it's a good sign for all of us!

kastanie23
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:46 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby kastanie23 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:04 am

nightman09 wrote:Sent in my application 11/2, UR on 11/29, but when I looked back today (12/8) it only says "Application is complete" ... is this potentially a bad sign, or just a glitch in the system? :?


This happened to me today as well??? I can only hope it's a good thing Fordham is kind of frustrating.

User avatar
neptunestar
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:27 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby neptunestar » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:08 am

If its happening to everyone its probably not a good or a bad sign!!!!

Glitch.

User avatar
nightman09
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:40 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby nightman09 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:12 am

Glitch.


Well, obviously, but it's nice to be optimistic!

User avatar
neptunestar
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:27 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby neptunestar » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:19 am

nightman09 wrote:
Glitch.


Well, obviously, but it's nice to be optimistic!

Haha true. I just dont wanna get my hopes up :-/

username99
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby username99 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:27 am

Fordham just emailed me and said "We're doing this on purpose to mess with everyone on TLS."

ebl1014
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:57 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby ebl1014 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:30 pm

username99 wrote:Fordham just emailed me and said "We're doing this on purpose to mess with everyone on TLS."


OMG. I didn't get the email!!!! Do you think it's a bad sign?

User avatar
JennBNYC
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:50 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby JennBNYC » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:33 pm

ebl1014 wrote:
username99 wrote:Fordham just emailed me and said "We're doing this on purpose to mess with everyone on TLS."


OMG. I didn't get the email!!!! Do you think it's a bad sign?


Haha :wink:

Edit: Is it sad that as soon as I saw this thread was updated I instantly logged into TLS? Also, is it bad that my heart missed a beat when my eyes focused on "get the email" with exclamation marks and I raced back to gmail? lol

username99
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby username99 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:37 pm

JennBNYC wrote:
ebl1014 wrote:
username99 wrote:Fordham just emailed me and said "We're doing this on purpose to mess with everyone on TLS."


OMG. I didn't get the email!!!! Do you think it's a bad sign?


Haha :wink:

Edit: Is it sad that as soon as I saw this thread was updated I instantly logged into TLS? Also, is it bad that my heart missed a beat when my eyes focused on "get the email" with exclamation marks and I raced back to gmail? lol


Yes and yes. There's something wrong with all of us.

ebl1014
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:57 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby ebl1014 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:26 pm

Waitlisted via SC

User avatar
lunaissleeping
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:34 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby lunaissleeping » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:30 pm

ebl1014 wrote:Waitlisted via SC


+1

User avatar
gdane
Posts: 12317
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby gdane » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:43 pm

gdane has also been waitlisted.

Time to suck dick?

3.1/163 URM.
Last edited by gdane on Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

username99
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby username99 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:49 pm

For those of you who were waitlisted, would you mind either posting or PMing your numbers?

User avatar
Stringer6
Posts: 5862
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:45 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby Stringer6 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:58 pm

yes, please post numbers if you don't mind.

i just checked and i'm still "complete" from "under review." 165/3.53

User avatar
ilovesf
Posts: 11742
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby ilovesf » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:00 pm

I actually wish I would be WL. My numbers aren't great at all, so maybe not being WL in this batch means getting a ding in the next few days.

User avatar
Gotti
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby Gotti » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:26 pm

username99 wrote:For those of you who were waitlisted, would you mind either posting or PMing your numbers?


+1 and also if you wrote a why X and a DS

ebl1014
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:57 am

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby ebl1014 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:31 pm

164/3.47 (big positive grade trajectory, 2.something freshman year, 3.8 soph, 3.9 junior, 3.8 senior), average softs, applied 9/23.... ummm, that's all the info I can think of.

User avatar
OklahomasOK
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:10 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby OklahomasOK » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:38 pm

UR, back to Complete...

zeke18
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby zeke18 » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:54 pm

waitlisted
ebl1014 wrote:Waitlisted via SC


+1

User avatar
Gotti
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby Gotti » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:55 pm

zeke18 wrote:waitlisted
ebl1014 wrote:Waitlisted via SC


+1


Stats?

User avatar
JennBNYC
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:50 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby JennBNYC » Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:04 pm

zeke18 wrote:waitlisted
ebl1014 wrote:Waitlisted via SC


+1


+1

User avatar
Eugenie Danglars
Posts: 2353
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Fordham 2011

Postby Eugenie Danglars » Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:28 pm

Still waiting, complete after UR. 172/3.3, so I'm just suspended in splitter land, I expect.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], mm2368 and 4 guests