Michigan 2011

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
ATR
Posts: 1119
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby ATR » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:25 pm

For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?

artemis178
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby artemis178 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:33 pm

ATR wrote:For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?


This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.

User avatar
askyemcdonald
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:53 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby askyemcdonald » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:39 pm

Thank you...making me sad in here!

User avatar
er doctor
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:35 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby er doctor » Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:41 pm

artemis178 wrote:
ATR wrote:For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?


This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.


But the answer is it comes a couple of weeks later

User avatar
lulucrazy
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby lulucrazy » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:04 pm

Entchen wrote:Haha, Dean Z likes a good party: http://www.law.umich.edu/connection/a2z/default.aspx


I love that woman and I would love to be her best friend!!!!!!!!!!!

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby r6_philly » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:06 pm

artemis178 wrote:
ATR wrote:For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?


This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.


People with 24 posts don't usually tell people with 2000+ posts where everything is... People who have been accepted are still 2011 applicants. HTH

- unless if you started the thread, then you are absolutely right :wink:

artemis178
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby artemis178 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:17 pm

r6_philly wrote:
artemis178 wrote:
ATR wrote:For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?


This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.


People with 24 posts don't usually tell people with 2000+ posts where everything is... People who have been accepted are still 2011 applicants. HTH

- unless if you started the thread, then you are absolutely right :wink:


I was just trying to be helpful to the poster by pointing him to the place he was more likely to get an answer. Posting ubiquitously on this forum doesn't necessarily equate with attentiveness.

And, ahem, I'm not sure what your real issue is here, r6, but self-appointed moderators don't get to tell any poster what he or she can or cannot post ;)

Having a bad day . . .?

User avatar
Ratchet Jackson
Posts: 2703
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:41 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby Ratchet Jackson » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:21 pm

artemis178 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
artemis178 wrote:
ATR wrote:For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?


This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.


People with 24 posts don't usually tell people with 2000+ posts where everything is... People who have been accepted are still 2011 applicants. HTH

- unless if you started the thread, then you are absolutely right :wink:


I was just trying to be helpful to the poster by pointing him to the place he was more likely to get an answer. Posting ubiquitously on this forum doesn't necessarily equate with attentiveness.

And, ahem, I'm not sure what your real issue is here, r6, but self-appointed moderators don't get to tell any poster what he or she can or cannot post ;)

Having a bad day . . .?


:roll: :roll:

User avatar
R.R. Raskolnikov
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:47 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby R.R. Raskolnikov » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:28 pm

RJ127 wrote:
artemis178 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
artemis178 wrote:This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.


People with 24 posts don't usually tell people with 2000+ posts where everything is... People who have been accepted are still 2011 applicants. HTH

- unless if you started the thread, then you are absolutely right :wink:


I was just trying to be helpful to the poster by pointing him to the place he was more likely to get an answer. Posting ubiquitously on this forum doesn't necessarily equate with attentiveness.

And, ahem, I'm not sure what your real issue is here, r6, but self-appointed moderators don't get to tell any poster what he or she can or cannot post ;)

Having a bad day . . .?


:roll: :roll:


+1 For real...

Gotta love those TLS power trippers... :lol:

c_dubya_s
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:58 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby c_dubya_s » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:29 pm

artemis178 wrote:
r6_philly wrote:
artemis178 wrote:
ATR wrote:For those who have been admitted and received a scholarship: did you receive scholarship information in your initial admission packet, or did it come later?


This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread.


People with 24 posts don't usually tell people with 2000+ posts where everything is... People who have been accepted are still 2011 applicants. HTH

- unless if you started the thread, then you are absolutely right :wink:


I was just trying to be helpful to the poster by pointing him to the place he was more likely to get an answer. Posting ubiquitously on this forum doesn't necessarily equate with attentiveness.

And, ahem, I'm not sure what your real issue is here, r6, but self-appointed moderators don't get to tell any poster what he or she can or cannot post ;)

Having a bad day . . .?

Image

artemis178
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby artemis178 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:37 pm

I'm glad somebody got it :wink:

User avatar
akili
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby akili » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:38 pm

I'm 2/10 and didn't get in today.


Doomed?

artemis178
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby artemis178 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:42 pm

akili wrote:I'm 2/10 and didn't get in today.


Doomed?


I have exactly the same dates that you do (submission/status checker) and I'm still optimistic. UM seems to be doing a pretty "holistic" review this year and has already sent out their huge batch of wait-lists, which they seem to only do once. It's certainly possible that we are both part of a "rejection" batch, but I think we still have a couple of weeks before all hope is lost :) Stay strong and happy!

c_dubya_s
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:58 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby c_dubya_s » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:42 pm

artemis178 wrote:I'm glad somebody got it :wink:

I thought that you were accusing R6 of being a self-appointed moderator, when you in fact had pretty much self-appointed yourself moderator about an hour ago when you told someone where to post. Hence the irony. Not sure if that's what I was supposed to get, but it was an excellent excuse for a LOLCAT.

But enough of that. Let's all be friends!
--ImageRemoved--
Last edited by c_dubya_s on Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

artemis178
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby artemis178 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:45 pm

c_dubya_s wrote:
artemis178 wrote:I'm glad somebody got it :wink:

Truth be told-I thought that you were accusing R6 of being a self-appointed moderator, when you in fact had pretty much self-appointed yourself moderator about an hour ago when you told someone where to post. Hence the irony.

But enough of that. Let's all be friends!
--ImageRemoved--



Haha. So you didn't actually get it then . . .? ;) I was being deliberately ironic (my effort to show r6, who is usually such a nice guy, how silly he was being).

But anyway . . .I'm certainly interested in being friends (even if I'm allergic to cats. AAAAaaachooo)

User avatar
hipstermafia
Posts: 1053
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:45 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby hipstermafia » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:15 pm

artemis178 wrote:But anyway . . .I'm certainly interested in being friends (even if I'm allergic to cats. AAAAaaachooo)

gtfo

sort of kidding, but CATS!

gotcha
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:49 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby gotcha » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:43 pm

hipstermafia wrote:
artemis178 wrote:But anyway . . .I'm certainly interested in being friends (even if I'm allergic to cats. AAAAaaachooo)

gtfo

sort of kidding, but CATS!


haha

User avatar
askyemcdonald
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:53 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby askyemcdonald » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:44 pm

My roommate is allergic to cats...and her bed is my cat's most favoritest place to sleep. LOL :D

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby r6_philly » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:57 pm

artemis178 wrote:
Haha. So you didn't actually get it then . . .? ;) I was being deliberately ironic (my effort to show r6, who is usually such a nice guy, how silly he was being).

But anyway . . .I'm certainly interested in being friends (even if I'm allergic to cats. AAAAaaachooo)


I just don't like people telling other people to stick to a supposedly appropriate subject when they didn't start the thread. It's never been the way how Internet forums worked.

artemis178
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:11 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby artemis178 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:41 pm

r6_philly wrote:
artemis178 wrote:
Haha. So you didn't actually get it then . . .? ;) I was being deliberately ironic (my effort to show r6, who is usually such a nice guy, how silly he was being).

But anyway . . .I'm certainly interested in being friends (even if I'm allergic to cats. AAAAaaachooo)


I just don't like people telling other people to stick to a supposedly appropriate subject when they didn't start the thread. It's never been the way how Internet forums worked.


*Sigh.* Honestly, r6, you misread me badly if you thought I was trying to tell the OP to stick to a "supposedly appropriate subject." Why would anyone be so petty? Who could possibly care about the "appropriate subject" matter of a thread enough to post about it? Good grief! My intention was to assist the OP in finding his answer. That is all.

What I wrote was, "This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread." This is straightforward and neutral.

One would have to to read into my post to interpret my tone as as accusatory in any way.

No doubt, if I had written the following my motives probably would have been clearer to you, but the content is more or less the same:

"This is not the right thread for that question," since "this is a thread for those still waiting to hear," and most of us probably don't know the answer. If you "find the Michigan 2014 thread" they will probably be able to better help you.

Oh, and, incidentally, I do not check to see how many posts a user has made before responding to him or her. That would be wildly inconvenient and my guess is that you don't really use that as your own standard of practice for the same reason. :wink:

At any rate, I apologize for the misunderstanding.

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby r6_philly » Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:48 pm

artemis178 wrote:
What I wrote was, "This is not the right thread for that question. This is a thread for those still waiting to hear. Find the Michigan 2014 thread." This is straightforward and neutral.


I think if you said "you probably won't get the answer in this thread" then it would have read differently.

But the point is, you are not correct in that this is not the right thread ... because many admits still post in the original thread, as illustrated by all the admits chiming in afterward.

That's why I mentioned post count because he/she obviously know the answer can be had here. Actually it would be easier to get the answer here because more people are subscibed to this thread by posting in it earlier.

It's ok. I get what you were saying now. But it was unfortunately not made out to be understood that way - by me and a few others.

It's cool :)

4102011
Posts: 1724
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:00 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby 4102011 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:50 pm

Hug it out, guys!

Image

Image

User avatar
bigjinjapan
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:02 am

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby bigjinjapan » Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:49 pm

Waitlisted a couple days ago. Pretty stoked not to get rejected outright with my splitter numbers. Mich has one of the best Japan-specific programs around and I really want to get in.

I want to write a strong LOCI but don't really have anything new to say that wasn't in my application. Is it bad to just repeat the whole 'why Michigan' thing in a LOCI? Or should I just say 'I'm still interested' and be done with it?

User avatar
Cade McNown
Posts: 550
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:54 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby Cade McNown » Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:46 pm

Uhhhh....So I went from Decision on 3/2 back to Complete 3/5. Glitch confirmation?

jrose5
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:54 pm

Re: Michigan 2011

Postby jrose5 » Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:47 pm

Cade McNown wrote:Uhhhh....So I went from Decision on 3/2 back to Complete 3/5. Glitch confirmation?


Probably... I also got "Decision" 3/02, and at the moment, the decision status is still there, but the date has changed to 3/05.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”