somewhere wrote:arism87 wrote:
Sorry but 99.5% of the time (making this number up) that is enough to know which is more compelling to an adcomm.
And the reason you're sure of this is LSN & TLS, nothing else, right? Both of which have an obvious self-selection bias and contradict the stated claims of the adcomms themselves.
Obviously super high numbers usually get accepted and super low ones usually get rejected. Anybody would be a fool to deny either of those things. But there are enough exceptions to both to temper the LSN/TLS numbers obsession.
Or not. The other option is to just keep being shocked every other day.
And anecdotal evidence, and medians, etc etc
I'm certainly not saying there aren't exceptions.
And I'm done, wrong place, beating a dead horse, etc etc