Re: Columbia 2011!
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:10 pm
The fuck. This spreadsheet is depressing.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=128825
thecilent wrote:thecilent wrote:QFnew pagedulcatis wrote:Form:
--LinkRemoved--
Results:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key ... y=CI_k5v0P
Can leave off your username if you want, & PM me to delete your thing if/when you get your VCE?
OOOHHHHHH this is the first time I've understood "QF"!!thecilent wrote:thecilent wrote:thecilent wrote:QFnew pagedulcatis wrote:Form:
--LinkRemoved--
Results:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key ... y=CI_k5v0P
Can leave off your username if you want, & PM me to delete your thing if/when you get your VCE?
QFarism87 wrote:OOOHHHHHH this is the first time I've understood "QF"!!
Yeah I would cause lots more batches to come.dulcatis wrote:Should I add a column for when the VCE was postmarked? Everyone but one person was 1/24, yeah?
One person reported it on their second TLS post..apparently in pms they sound legit, but I'm still suspicious.glitched wrote:is there a 1/26 batch?
kk so if i put you as 1/24 and you were another date, PM me and I'll fix itthecilent wrote:Yeah I would cause lots more batches to come.dulcatis wrote:Should I add a column for when the VCE was postmarked? Everyone but one person was 1/24, yeah?
lol Love itLinzerTorte wrote:One person reported it on their second TLS post..apparently in pms they sound legit, but I'm still suspicious.glitched wrote:is there a 1/26 batch?
They mentioned something about the acceptance letter other people have, so I'm going to go with they're legit. Or my least favorite troll everLinzerTorte wrote:One person reported it on their second TLS post..apparently in pms they sound legit, but I'm still suspicious.glitched wrote:is there a 1/26 batch?
Just because she got the letter doesn't mean it was dated 1/26..dulcatis wrote:They mentioned something about the acceptance letter other people have, so I'm going to go with they're legit. Or my least favorite troll everLinzerTorte wrote:One person reported it on their second TLS post..apparently in pms they sound legit, but I'm still suspicious.glitched wrote:is there a 1/26 batch?
thecilent wrote:lol Love itLinzerTorte wrote:One person reported it on their second TLS post..apparently in pms they sound legit, but I'm still suspicious.glitched wrote:is there a 1/26 batch?
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHH.dbrddr wrote:I think the survey is so skewed toward No :(s because the admits have no reason to keep reading the thread ('cept for the lolcats)
I posted it in the class of 2014 thread, so hopefully some of 'em will help us out!arism87 wrote:SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHH.dbrddr wrote:I think the survey is so skewed toward No :(s because the admits have no reason to keep reading the thread ('cept for the lolcats)
FWIW I plugged Kaitlyn's numbers into LSP and she had a 3.8 index, so URM results might be way different depending on the applicant pool and individual softs. But your numbers are competitive even without the boost, so you should be fine.Knock wrote:Perhaps you should have a separate set of columns for URMs?
arism87 wrote:SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHH.dbrddr wrote:I think the survey is so skewed toward No :(s because the admits have no reason to keep reading the thread ('cept for the lolcats)
LinzerTorte wrote:One person reported it on their second TLS post..apparently in pms they sound legit, but I'm still suspicious.glitched wrote:is there a 1/26 batch?
But having one NYCer get it today is really depressing for the rest of us NYCers...cuz the last 1/24 batch got to all the NYC ppl the next day.eskimo wrote:Guys it's only 1/27. If there was a 1/26 batch it'd make sense that more people hadn't heard yet.