Columbia 2011! Forum
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:39 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Do you think they ask for it directly so that if your GPA does fall but they decide to accept you, they only have to send in the LSDAS GPA?
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I think it has more to do with processing time (LSAC takes a while to process transcripts) but that doesn't mean they aren't thinking about us news...padthai wrote:Do you think they ask for it directly so that if your GPA does fall but they decide to accept you, they only have to send in the LSDAS GPA?
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:52 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
FWIW, I got a request for fall grades, and I have nearly a 4.0.
- obrienfa
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Agreed.archie&veronica wrote:I think it has more to do with processing time (LSAC takes a while to process transcripts) but that doesn't mean they aren't thinking about us news...padthai wrote:Do you think they ask for it directly so that if your GPA does fall but they decide to accept you, they only have to send in the LSDAS GPA?
I am curious as to what their basis is for requesting fall grades. There have been a lot of almost 4.0ers who are being asked for grades.MPeterson wrote:FWIW, I got a request for fall grades, and I have nearly a 4.0.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Maybe they are trying to "hold" you guys over without actually "holding" you.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- swc65
- Posts: 1003
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:27 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Yeah I had a 4.+ and they asked for my fall grades. It was weird and troubling.obrienfa wrote:Agreed.archie&veronica wrote:I think it has more to do with processing time (LSAC takes a while to process transcripts) but that doesn't mean they aren't thinking about us news...padthai wrote:Do you think they ask for it directly so that if your GPA does fall but they decide to accept you, they only have to send in the LSDAS GPA?
I am curious as to what their basis is for requesting fall grades. There have been a lot of almost 4.0ers who are being asked for grades.MPeterson wrote:FWIW, I got a request for fall grades, and I have nearly a 4.0.
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Looks like they're only asking for grades from those with very high gpas. Are you all reverse splitters?swc65 wrote:Yeah I had a 4.+ and they asked for my fall grades. It was weird and troubling.obrienfa wrote:Agreed.archie&veronica wrote:I think it has more to do with processing time (LSAC takes a while to process transcripts) but that doesn't mean they aren't thinking about us news...padthai wrote:Do you think they ask for it directly so that if your GPA does fall but they decide to accept you, they only have to send in the LSDAS GPA?
I am curious as to what their basis is for requesting fall grades. There have been a lot of almost 4.0ers who are being asked for grades.MPeterson wrote:FWIW, I got a request for fall grades, and I have nearly a 4.0.
- Excellence = a Habit
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:15 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
They asked for grades from a 3.7 as well (T6 Hopeful)CastleRock wrote: Looks like they're only asking for grades from those with very high gpas. Are you all reverse splitters?
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
That's still a decent gpa for Columbia (not great admittedly). I'm just curious what these peoples LSATs look like in comparison to their gpas.Excellence = a Habit wrote:They asked for grades from a 3.7 as well (T6 Hopeful)CastleRock wrote: Looks like they're only asking for grades from those with very high gpas. Are you all reverse splitters?
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
In UG + seriously under consideration = automatic request for grades?
- dooterdude11
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:49 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
bdubs wrote:In UG + seriously under consideration = automatic request for grades?
My lsat is a 171. They requested my grades and I have a 4.0.
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
So you fall into that splitter category. It's still odd. How much could your grades possibly change this semester?dooterdude11 wrote:bdubs wrote:In UG + seriously under consideration = automatic request for grades?
My lsat is a 171. They requested my grades and I have a 4.0.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Sounds consistent with my theory. You have a 4.4+ index and are only one point under median.dooterdude11 wrote:bdubs wrote:In UG + seriously under consideration = automatic request for grades?
My lsat is a 171. They requested my grades and I have a 4.0.
Last edited by bdubs on Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
This won't be true, unless your definition of "seriously under consideration" is different from mine. They aren't going to want everyone they accept to send in grade info, too much extra work.bdubs wrote:In UG + seriously under consideration = automatic request for grades?
- dooterdude11
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:49 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
And I've also been accepted to nyu, berkeley and got a jr1 from harvard. If that helps.
I wanna know what this grade request business is!!
I wanna know what this grade request business is!!
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
They only accept 1,200 people and a good number of them are probably out of UG. Considering the stats for WE at HYS, I would guess that 40-60% or more of accepts are not in UG. It doesn't take long to send an e-mail and read a transcript.CastleRock wrote:This won't be true, unless your definition of "seriously under consideration" is different from mine. They aren't going to want everyone they accept to send in grade info, too much extra work.bdubs wrote:In UG + seriously under consideration = automatic request for grades?
- obrienfa
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I am the 3.7 Habit was talking about. I have a 171 LSAT.CastleRock wrote:That's still a decent gpa for Columbia (not great admittedly). I'm just curious what these peoples LSATs look like in comparison to their gpas.Excellence = a Habit wrote:They asked for grades from a 3.7 as well (T6 Hopeful)CastleRock wrote: Looks like they're only asking for grades from those with very high gpas. Are you all reverse splitters?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
So far from what I have seen it looks mostly like borderline LSATs are getting these requests. Although, I've seen one data point that doesn't fit this profile.obrienfa wrote:I am the 3.7 Habit was talking about. I have a 171 LSAT.CastleRock wrote:That's still a decent gpa for Columbia (not great admittedly). I'm just curious what these peoples LSATs look like in comparison to their gpas.Excellence = a Habit wrote:They asked for grades from a 3.7 as well (T6 Hopeful)CastleRock wrote: Looks like they're only asking for grades from those with very high gpas. Are you all reverse splitters?
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
You're crazy to think a 4.0 171 is "borderline". The MEDIAN is 172, meaning that somewhere close to 50% of the class is below that. Median GPA is pretty far from 4.0, so I wouldn't call any of these applicants borderline.CastleRock wrote:So far from what I have seen it looks mostly like borderline LSATs are getting these requests. Although, I've seen one data point that doesn't fit this profile.
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... ,5&type=jdbdubs wrote:You're crazy to think a 4.0 171 is "borderline". The MEDIAN is 172, meaning that somewhere close to 50% of the class is below that. Median GPA is pretty far from 4.0, so I wouldn't call any of these applicants borderline.CastleRock wrote:So far from what I have seen it looks mostly like borderline LSATs are getting these requests. Although, I've seen one data point that doesn't fit this profile.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/
Really? Looks like these candidates are pretty borderline for CLS. Maybe you should check the data before you run your mouth.
- obrienfa
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
That is just a fraction of the 120 students they admitted last year....CastleRock wrote:http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... ,5&type=jdbdubs wrote:You're crazy to think a 4.0 171 is "borderline". The MEDIAN is 172, meaning that somewhere close to 50% of the class is below that. Median GPA is pretty far from 4.0, so I wouldn't call any of these applicants borderline.CastleRock wrote:So far from what I have seen it looks mostly like borderline LSATs are getting these requests. Although, I've seen one data point that doesn't fit this profile.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/
Really? Looks like these candidates are pretty borderline for CLS. Maybe you should check the data before you run your mouth.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
What's your point?obrienfa wrote:That is just a fraction of the 120 students they admitted last year....CastleRock wrote:http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... ,5&type=jdbdubs wrote:You're crazy to think a 4.0 171 is "borderline". The MEDIAN is 172, meaning that somewhere close to 50% of the class is below that. Median GPA is pretty far from 4.0, so I wouldn't call any of these applicants borderline.CastleRock wrote:So far from what I have seen it looks mostly like borderline LSATs are getting these requests. Although, I've seen one data point that doesn't fit this profile.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/
Really? Looks like these candidates are pretty borderline for CLS. Maybe you should check the data before you run your mouth.
- deneuve39
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I think it's generally a good sign, although definitely strange given that you all seem to have such high GPAs. I was a splitter w/ a lower LSAT and a 3.75 and got the request, and then an acceptance letter in January two application seasons ago (as did most others who got grade requests). It's definitely better than getting put on hold.dooterdude11 wrote:And I've also been accepted to nyu, berkeley and got a jr1 from harvard. If that helps.
I wanna know what this grade request business is!!
- obrienfa
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
That you can't say certain LSAT/GPA's are boardline with that small of a sampling. Maybe we won't get immediately but we all still have a decent chance looking at medians and whatnot.CastleRock wrote: What's your point?
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
If they were gunning to increase their numbers then these people would all get in. Showing mixed results doesn't mean that they are "borderline" applicants, just that admission is not guaranteed. Very few outright rejects in this group.CastleRock wrote:http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... ,5&type=jdbdubs wrote:You're crazy to think a 4.0 171 is "borderline". The MEDIAN is 172, meaning that somewhere close to 50% of the class is below that. Median GPA is pretty far from 4.0, so I wouldn't call any of these applicants borderline.CastleRock wrote:So far from what I have seen it looks mostly like borderline LSATs are getting these requests. Although, I've seen one data point that doesn't fit this profile.
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/
Really? Looks like these candidates are pretty borderline for CLS. Maybe you should check the data before you run your mouth.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login