I was born on Chinese NY, so today is my real birthday (screw what's on my drivers license, says my mom). So I better get a VCE.dulcatis wrote:& everyone, wear red tomorrow for Chinese NY! It'll bring you luckkkk (& hopefully VCEs? or at least a day of adcoms not fucking with us?)
& hellojd, what do you mean by "just"? & no one knows about what it means since we don't think that they did it in such huge #s last year. So we are all very, very confused.
Columbia 2011! Forum
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
So what's the consensus on hold? Worth it to write a LOCI or submit extra letters of recommendation? They only mention sending in an updated transcript, which I don't have.
ETA: What is a VCE? Haven't been following this thread, sorry.
ETA: What is a VCE? Haven't been following this thread, sorry.
Last edited by mrmangs on Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1724
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
You're two lunar months older than I am! If I remember correctly. I figured this out once...r6_philly wrote:I was born on Chinese NY, so today is my real birthday (screw what's on my drivers license, says my mom). So I better get a VCE.dulcatis wrote:& everyone, wear red tomorrow for Chinese NY! It'll bring you luckkkk (& hopefully VCEs? or at least a day of adcoms not fucking with us?)
& hellojd, what do you mean by "just"? & no one knows about what it means since we don't think that they did it in such huge #s last year. So we are all very, very confused.
& I'm sure you will get a lovely vomit-colored bday present
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Vomit Colored Envelope. The mythical thing that comes to you via the zip man if you are lucky enough to get accepted. Or the result when you upchuck on the rejection letter.mrmangs wrote:So what's the consensus on hold? Worth it to write a LOCI or submit extra letters of recommendation? They only mention sending in an updated transcript, which I don't have.
ETA: What is a VCE? Haven't been following this thread, sorry.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 8:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
People are still receiving holds? At this hour?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I think they are just reporting in. Not everyone check mailakikaze wrote:People are still receiving holds? At this hour?
- hellojd
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:29 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Woops, sorry guys! I'm international at the moment, and just woke up to a hold e-mail haha. To be precise, I got it in my inbox about 6 hours ago.bistduverrueckt wrote:They haven't been able to make a final decision, you should get one by the end of April, and nobody really knows the chances part. The numbers are all over the place.hellojd wrote:Just got the hold e-mail...
Hate to ask this, but i lost track of this thread when it exploded around page 190 lol. Could someone briefly tell me what hold entails in terms of chances / when we can expect a final decision?
HTH
ETA: you JUST got a hold email? as in just now? they're STILL sending them?
- mrmangs
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Yeah, I got it in the afternoon. Just checking in now.r6_philly wrote:I think they are just reporting in. Not everyone check mailakikaze wrote:People are still receiving holds? At this hour?every 5 minutesinstantly, all 20 accounts.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 8:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Fair enough -- please add stats to the document. Damn, though -- competition is intense! Lots of talented applicants out there.mrmangs wrote:Yeah, I got it in the afternoon. Just checking in now.r6_philly wrote:I think they are just reporting in. Not everyone check mailakikaze wrote:People are still receiving holds? At this hour?every 5 minutesinstantly, all 20 accounts.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:24 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I think quite a few of the non-hold group can go to bed feeling slightly more optimistic. There aren't many auto-waitlist or auto-ding numbers and judging from the sheer volume and range earlier today, I think we'd have been held if we were waitlist bound.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I agree with this. Especially I've been complete since 10/12. But watch me get Reserve email tomorrow.Quadrangulum wrote:I think quite a few of the non-hold group can go to bed feeling slightly more optimistic. There aren't many auto-waitlist or auto-ding numbers and judging from the sheer volume and range earlier today, I think we'd have been held if we were waitlist bound.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 8:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
I have to say, the 4.75 index HYPS graduate really paints a different picture of the non-held group; that must be an auto-admit.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
HYPS? What we live on the West Coast?akikaze wrote:I have to say, the 4.75 index HYPS graduate really paints a different picture of the non-held group; that must be an auto-admit.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:02 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Held as well - kind of shocked because I've been slaughtered in the T14 save Gtown/Cornell (UVA, Chicago rejections, deferral from UPenn ED).
It seems that I have the worst stats in the entire held group - 3.7, 168. It can't be a good place to be if I'm there!
It seems that I have the worst stats in the entire held group - 3.7, 168. It can't be a good place to be if I'm there!
- The Stig
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:27 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
another theory-maybe CLS is gunning for the #3 ranking, and being extremely cautious?
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
They no get #3.The Stig wrote:another theory-maybe CLS is gunning for the #3 ranking, and being extremely cautious?
- glitched
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
yeah they're going for #1.r6_philly wrote:They no get #3.The Stig wrote:another theory-maybe CLS is gunning for the #3 ranking, and being extremely cautious?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I am wary of this thread that grew 40 pages without getting a single, actual decision.
- glitched
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
there were two decisions today i believe. one in LA and one in bay area.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Those were made in the last month.glitched wrote:there were two decisions today i believe. one in LA and one in bay area.
- absolutazn87
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:16 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
QF new pageabsolutazn87 wrote:I'm following the trend and turning my "Hold" spreadsheet into a form too.
If you've been held, fill this form out!
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/viewfo ... c6MQ#gid=0
Results:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key ... y=CJCcv50J
If you've already posted your numbers before in this thread or you've PMed me, don't fill out the form
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
It would need to bump up its prestige with lawyers & judges substantially to influence the reputation category (15%) and faculty resources are probably not going to change a lot relative to S (15%). Placement is indistinguishable for the two (20%). So they are really left having to find 380 students who have better numerical qualities than S will admit. I seriously doubt that they will be able/willing to top S in the GPA median category, especially if they want to maintain their LSAT standards. Also, acceptance rate is only 2.5% of the total USNWR score so boosting yield doesn't get you a whole lot.The Stig wrote:another theory-maybe CLS is gunning for the #3 ranking, and being extremely cautious?
The gaming the rankings explanations are just not working for me.
- The Stig
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:27 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
fair enough! stig conspiracy theory #3 debunked!bdubs wrote:It would need to bump up its prestige with lawyers & judges substantially to influence the reputation category (15%) and faculty resources are probably not going to change a lot relative to S (15%). Placement is indistinguishable for the two (20%). So they are really left having to find 380 students who have better numerical qualities than S will admit. I seriously doubt that they will be able/willing to top S in the GPA median category, especially if they want to maintain their LSAT standards. Also, acceptance rate is only 2.5% of the total USNWR score so boosting yield doesn't get you a whole lot.The Stig wrote:another theory-maybe CLS is gunning for the #3 ranking, and being extremely cautious?
The gaming the rankings explanations are just not working for me.
-
- Posts: 1724
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I could see the wary-of-Rubenstein theory, but trying to crack the top 3 is pretty hardcore.
- glitched
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
dulcatis wrote:I could see the wary-of-Rubenstein theory, but trying to crack the top 3 is pretty hardcore.
man i never even thought of that... i wonder what all the peer schools thought about the ruby.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login