very true, but when Sir Ferg and Man U are involved I don't rule anything outfathergoose wrote:I wouldn't put too much stock in transfer rumors. I don't think it's very likely that Inter lets him go. He's on contract for 3 more seasons with them.sneijder wrote:thanks bro!! GO ORANJE!! yea they're def my favorite international team (barring the USA of course) and sneijder is pure class! But I hope he doesnt end up at MAN U like people are saying.... but it seems like inter is going to sale him--for 35million Euros
SMU 2011 Forum
- sneijder
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:40 am
Re: SMU 2011
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:19 pm
Re: SMU 2011
Pony tracks now says to check back after July 8th for financial aid; looks like they just keep pushing the date back more and more.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU 2011
Stan Eddy is a useless SOB.
Last edited by kalvano on Wed Jul 06, 2011 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- swilson215
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:35 pm
Re: SMU 2011
Last time it went from June 15 to July 5, right? At least they're pushing it back in smaller increments now...maybe that means they're actually closer?lawboy22 wrote:Pony tracks now says to check back after July 8th for financial aid; looks like they just keep pushing the date back more and more.
(Yeah, I know, I'm pulling at straws).
-
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm
Re: SMU 2011
What are y'all trying to figure out about financial aid?swilson215 wrote:Last time it went from June 15 to July 5, right? At least they're pushing it back in smaller increments now...maybe that means they're actually closer?lawboy22 wrote:Pony tracks now says to check back after July 8th for financial aid; looks like they just keep pushing the date back more and more.
(Yeah, I know, I'm pulling at straws).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:28 pm
Re: SMU 2011
do you think there is still chance for the waitlisters at this point...my application page is still active...are there others whose pages are still active and they r still hopeful?
- swilson215
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:35 pm
Re: SMU 2011
Just waiting for award notifications.chrisokc wrote:What are y'all trying to figure out about financial aid?swilson215 wrote:Last time it went from June 15 to July 5, right? At least they're pushing it back in smaller increments now...maybe that means they're actually closer?lawboy22 wrote:Pony tracks now says to check back after July 8th for financial aid; looks like they just keep pushing the date back more and more.
(Yeah, I know, I'm pulling at straws).
-
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:27 pm
Re: SMU 2011
I'm still hopeful, but we'll see...bebe wrote:do you think there is still chance for the waitlisters at this point...my application page is still active...are there others whose pages are still active and they r still hopeful?
Are you FT or PT? I'm FT.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: SMU 2011
I think there's a decent chance people will still be accepted. I doubt I will go regardless of what happens, but if you're willing to wait until August, I wouldn't lose hope.bebe wrote:do you think there is still chance for the waitlisters at this point...my application page is still active...are there others whose pages are still active and they r still hopeful?
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:28 pm
Re: SMU 2011
thanks renee for reassuring post... what makes you think we have a decent chance?
flamingo ..i am both ft and pt
flamingo ..i am both ft and pt
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: SMU 2011
Well, when I called SMU they said they could accept people all the way up until the first day of classes. I don't know if they've done that in years past, but I know a lot of other schools do. I'm guessing they'll keep that option open for themselves until then because people may change their minds at the last minute. I'm sure there will be at least a few openings as currently admitted students get offered places at better schools or just change their minds about attending.bebe wrote:thanks renee for reassuring post... what makes you think we have a decent chance?
flamingo ..i am both ft and pt
- Thirteen
- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2011
I know of a girl that was admitted in mid-July, and another one that was admitted some time in August. Keep the faith!renee88 wrote:Well, when I called SMU they said they could accept people all the way up until the first day of classes. I don't know if they've done that in years past, but I know a lot of other schools do. I'm guessing they'll keep that option open for themselves until then because people may change their minds at the last minute. I'm sure there will be at least a few openings as currently admitted students get offered places at better schools or just change their minds about attending.bebe wrote:thanks renee for reassuring post... what makes you think we have a decent chance?
flamingo ..i am both ft and pt
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: SMU 2011
There was a student in my PT class who was acccepted the week classes started (I think it might have been the day before classes started).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- asunshinee
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:46 am
Re: SMU 2011
ebo wrote:Retake, retake, retake. Both your GPA and LSAT are under SMU medians, so unless you're a URM, you need to retake. I had a lower GPA and a 166 and got 76k.asunshinee wrote:I plan on applying with a 3.55 (probably will be a 3.58 or 3.6 by the time I actually apply) and a 163. I thought this was solid for SMU but apparently not? Should I retake or should I just take my chances?
All that matters is your LSAC GPAasunshinee wrote:My major GPA is a 3.9 if that makes any difference.
I've heard that if you don't think you can raise your LSAT score by 5 points.. then it looks bad. I would need to get a 168, which I've never gotten on a practice test before. Is that worth the risk of taking it and doing the same / a couple points better?
- Thirteen
- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2011
When I retook, my score dropped 5 points. I don't think it negatively affected my cycle.asunshinee wrote:ebo wrote:Retake, retake, retake. Both your GPA and LSAT are under SMU medians, so unless you're a URM, you need to retake. I had a lower GPA and a 166 and got 76k.asunshinee wrote:I plan on applying with a 3.55 (probably will be a 3.58 or 3.6 by the time I actually apply) and a 163. I thought this was solid for SMU but apparently not? Should I retake or should I just take my chances?
All that matters is your LSAC GPAasunshinee wrote:My major GPA is a 3.9 if that makes any difference.
I've heard that if you don't think you can raise your LSAT score by 5 points.. then it looks bad. I would need to get a 168, which I've never gotten on a practice test before. Is that worth the risk of taking it and doing the same / a couple points better?
- ebo
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:49 pm
Re: SMU 2011
Yes, shoot for a 165+. I think 165 was the magic number for SMU this cycleasunshinee wrote:ebo wrote:Retake, retake, retake. Both your GPA and LSAT are under SMU medians, so unless you're a URM, you need to retake. I had a lower GPA and a 166 and got 76k.asunshinee wrote:I plan on applying with a 3.55 (probably will be a 3.58 or 3.6 by the time I actually apply) and a 163. I thought this was solid for SMU but apparently not? Should I retake or should I just take my chances?
All that matters is your LSAC GPAasunshinee wrote:My major GPA is a 3.9 if that makes any difference.
I've heard that if you don't think you can raise your LSAT score by 5 points.. then it looks bad. I would need to get a 168, which I've never gotten on a practice test before. Is that worth the risk of taking it and doing the same / a couple points better?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: SMU 2011
I wouldn't worry about needing to raise it 5 points. A score of, say, 166 is above their median and will help SMU raise its median- those things are what they're concerned with, in my opinion. They won't worry about the previous score, especially as it's their stated policy to only consider the highest score.asunshinee wrote:ebo wrote:Retake, retake, retake. Both your GPA and LSAT are under SMU medians, so unless you're a URM, you need to retake. I had a lower GPA and a 166 and got 76k.asunshinee wrote:I plan on applying with a 3.55 (probably will be a 3.58 or 3.6 by the time I actually apply) and a 163. I thought this was solid for SMU but apparently not? Should I retake or should I just take my chances?
All that matters is your LSAC GPAasunshinee wrote:My major GPA is a 3.9 if that makes any difference.
I've heard that if you don't think you can raise your LSAT score by 5 points.. then it looks bad. I would need to get a 168, which I've never gotten on a practice test before. Is that worth the risk of taking it and doing the same / a couple points better?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- asunshinee
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:46 am
Re: SMU 2011
renee88 wrote:I wouldn't worry about needing to raise it 5 points. A score of, say, 166 is above their median and will help SMU raise its median- those things are what they're concerned with, in my opinion. They won't worry about the previous score, especially as it's their stated policy to only consider the highest score.asunshinee wrote:ebo wrote:Retake, retake, retake. Both your GPA and LSAT are under SMU medians, so unless you're a URM, you need to retake. I had a lower GPA and a 166 and got 76k.asunshinee wrote:I plan on applying with a 3.55 (probably will be a 3.58 or 3.6 by the time I actually apply) and a 163. I thought this was solid for SMU but apparently not? Should I retake or should I just take my chances?
All that matters is your LSAC GPAasunshinee wrote:My major GPA is a 3.9 if that makes any difference.
I've heard that if you don't think you can raise your LSAT score by 5 points.. then it looks bad. I would need to get a 168, which I've never gotten on a practice test before. Is that worth the risk of taking it and doing the same / a couple points better?
Not to beat a dead horse or anything, but hypothetically speaking.. if I do worse on the October LSAT, would that look bad to admissions? I know they have a policy of only considering the highest score, but would it be more damaging to see a lower score than to just not retake it?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: SMU 2011
I really doubt it would have a significant impact. I'm not an expert by any means, but I've heard of several people (one just a few posts ago) who dropped points their second test but still did as expected in admissions based on the first score. I really think they just take the highest score regardless of whether it came from the first test or the second. I've never heard otherwise. There are a million reasons someone could drop their score (illness, bad day, etc) and I doubt they'd put a lot of thought into it.
- labeauche
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:30 am
Re: SMU 2011
financial aid is finally out. hoozah!
- Thirteen
- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2011
It won't hurt. I got a 169, then retook and got a 164. Didn't hurt with SMU (but did cause me to get autodinged at UVA, haha).asunshinee wrote:renee88 wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse or anything, but hypothetically speaking.. if I do worse on the October LSAT, would that look bad to admissions? I know they have a policy of only considering the highest score, but would it be more damaging to see a lower score than to just not retake it?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:40 pm
Re: SMU 2011
Does UVA average scores?Thirteen wrote:It won't hurt. I got a 169, then retook and got a 164. Didn't hurt with SMU (but did cause me to get autodinged at UVA, haha).asunshinee wrote:renee88 wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse or anything, but hypothetically speaking.. if I do worse on the October LSAT, would that look bad to admissions? I know they have a policy of only considering the highest score, but would it be more damaging to see a lower score than to just not retake it?
- fathergoose
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2011
UVA and other splitter friendly schools don't like splitters whose second attempt was lower than their first attempt. Your best options as a splitter are (a) kill the lsat the first time and dont retake or (b) kill it your first time and do even better the second time.renee88 wrote:Does UVA average scores?
-
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:27 pm
Re: SMU 2011
I wish SMU would send out updates to waitlisted people.
- Thirteen
- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2011
This. Also, I didn't score above their 75% mark, so my shot at the school went up in flames. The score came out on a Saturday, and I was dinged the following Monday. Bastards.fathergoose wrote:UVA and other splitter friendly schools don't like splitters whose second attempt was lower than their first attempt. Your best options as a splitter are (a) kill the lsat the first time and dont retake or (b) kill it your first time and do even better the second time.renee88 wrote:Does UVA average scores?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login