- Posts: 721
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:57 am
The obvious answer would seem to be that thy are borderline candidates and SLS was unsure about them; but then why not waitlist them? I have not noticed this trend at other schools... has anyone else?
For full disclosure, my curiosity stems from the fact that I applied to SLS on 10/20 and have not heard a peep. Any others in the situation?
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:19 am
Shaggier1 wrote:why Stanford takes so long to reject certain folks
...I would say it's that they can do whatever they want. We the applicants are at a distinct disadvantage in this whole process.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 20171lhopeful, acz26, beantheshadow, Bing [Bot], bleakchimera2, cantyoloforever, cianchetta0, cjar819, ellielaw, Harry Ass Truman, Hopefullawkid2015, jtawil, jtn123, kiwi50, l3g@l33s3, LAW1995, Leliana, Long shot hero, mav1993, memphis7598, Nobiggie, NotAGolfer, ohgosh, pkalltheway, potatocowpower, TakeItToTrial, Thomas Hagan, ESQ., trmckenz, vho1791 and 56 guests