JSUVA2012 wrote:bloodonthetracks wrote:JSUVA2012 wrote:Biggest problem here is you guys are actually putting stock in what adcomms tell you. Y'all realize that PR is a big part of their job, right?
and you are putting all of your stock in LSN, which shows us a plot of unaccredited data points posted by a tiny, tiny fraction of a law school's applicant pool. i'm not saying LSN is worthless by any means, but don't act like you have god on your side.
I'd rather believe an anonymous sample than people who have a clear interest in getting me to apply to their school (and making everyone think their admissions process is holistic and fair).
either way, it's all speculation. even an accurate graph of every applicant (which is a far cry from what LSN is) wouldn't tell us that much about how each school's adcomm valued UG. this thread is futile and a waste of time (i.e. perfect of TLSers, including myself).