Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
ryguy
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby ryguy » Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:16 pm

IN at Fordham via status checker!!! Happpiiieee

Zara
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:37 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Zara » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:39 pm

In at Northwestern. They sent me 4 emails in a row to announce it. Sent my application in early january.

ENGINEERD
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby ENGINEERD » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:56 am

Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).

manwitaplan
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby manwitaplan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:11 am

cardinalandgold wrote:In at Emory via snail mail.



when did you send ur app?

User avatar
Relientkate
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:42 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Relientkate » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:53 am

ENGINEERD wrote:Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).

#s?

User avatar
bloodonthetracks
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby bloodonthetracks » Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:01 pm

neimanmarxist wrote:
bloodonthetracks wrote:in at penn via phone


congrats ! when did you go complete/ UR?

In other news in at NU via e-mail today.


i don't have all the info in front of me right now, but i went UR about three weeks ago

User avatar
cardinalandgold
Posts: 554
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby cardinalandgold » Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:16 pm

Finally complete at Cornell! And in review at UW!

ENGINEERD
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:15 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby ENGINEERD » Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:32 pm

Relientkate wrote:
ENGINEERD wrote:Waitlisted at BU via email (kinda expected). Waitlisted at Arizona via status checker (A bit confused on this one).

#s?


167/3.2

User avatar
Genki
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Genki » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:19 pm

Hold at Columbia.

manwitaplan
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby manwitaplan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:26 pm

Genki wrote:Hold at Columbia.


when did you apply to Columbia?

User avatar
tallboone
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:27 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby tallboone » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:26 pm

Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.


YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.

User avatar
Panther7
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:34 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Panther7 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:01 pm

tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.


YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.


well, Case accepted me with a 2.6/166 and gave me a scholly, so yeah, it's probably YP.

Zara
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:37 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Zara » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:53 pm

scholarship at vanderbilt for $81,000 via snail mail.

User avatar
Lonagan
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:03 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Lonagan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:40 pm

tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.


YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.


Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.

User avatar
ryguy
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby ryguy » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:46 pm

Akron University post card. "There still is time!!!"

User avatar
traehekat
Posts: 3195
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby traehekat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:48 pm

Lonagan wrote:
tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.


YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.


Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.


Pwned. Some people underestimate just how valuable a 170+ LSAT is. There are plenty of folks with a 3.5+ GPA, so few with 170+ (although TLS may make it seem otherwise).

User avatar
MF248
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:25 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby MF248 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:16 pm

traehekat wrote:
Lonagan wrote:
tallboone wrote:
Lonagan wrote:On hold at case Western. I'm thinking YP at 2.8x / 171. At any rate they need to offer me a full ride to get me to think about it, so likely withdrawing.


YP with a C+ college average? This is the stuff that drives me nuts on TLS.


Several T20 admits + scholarships lends credence to my hunch. Have fun going crazy though.


Pwned. Some people underestimate just how valuable a 170+ LSAT is. There are plenty of folks with a 3.5+ GPA, so few with 170+ (although TLS may make it seem otherwise).


why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?

User avatar
Lonagan
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:03 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Lonagan » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:21 pm

Because it's a numbers game.

User avatar
Genki
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:04 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby Genki » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:27 pm

manwitaplan wrote:
Genki wrote:Hold at Columbia.


when did you apply to Columbia?


Sent in my app on 01/04

User avatar
traehekat
Posts: 3195
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby traehekat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:33 pm

MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?


Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.

User avatar
MF248
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:25 am

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby MF248 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:35 pm

traehekat wrote:
MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?


Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.


If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.

User avatar
traehekat
Posts: 3195
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby traehekat » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:53 pm

MF248 wrote:
traehekat wrote:
MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?


Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.


If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.


Like I said, hard to tell in the case of a splitter, but he/she DID mention they have several T20 admits and scholarships, so a hold from Case is a little surprising.

User avatar
thickfreakness
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:39 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby thickfreakness » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:07 am

MF248 wrote:
traehekat wrote:
MF248 wrote:why does everyone assume it has to be YP & that a school just may not be all that into you?


Eh, it is a bit hard to tell in Lonagan's case because he/she is a splitter, but generally if you have the numbers you should be in. If you aren't, it is probably either YP, criminal record, applied too late, or a massive application mistake.


If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.


+1 here.

User avatar
taw856
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:05 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby taw856 » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:42 am

MF248 wrote:If someone is over both 75%'s I'm fine with people calling YP. but if they're a splitter, myself included, I don't really know if they have the right to shout YP.


--ImageRemoved--

You're probably right in most cases, but just had to drag out American's graph for this year given the discussion.

User avatar
traehekat
Posts: 3195
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Who'd you hear from? - Post-December LSAT Applicants

Postby traehekat » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:52 am

Oh man, haha, look at that heinous yield protection right there.

164 = auto admit.
166+ = auto waitlist.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests