Gotti wrote:msridiculous447 wrote:mettasutta wrote:Dearest BU,
No wonder that on your viewbook there's not one photo of this architectural monstrosity:
If you can believe it, that's its good side. If you view it from the other direction you can see that the base of it is actually smaller/narrower than the top (by like maybe 20 feet on both dimensions). It really doesn't look like it should be able to stand. It's architecturally unsound.
it's called "brutalist" architecture. barf.
I visited this weekend and my tour guide said that the building was landmarked because of its unique architecture and that if they open new facilities, they wouldn't be able to tear down that... yeah, monstrosity is the word. God. So ugly.