hopefulundergrad wrote: Desert Fox wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:I'm AA, just trying to stay incognito.
Then why put up a LSN page? Adding inaccurate data doesn't help the purpose of LSN.
It'll be accurate when my cycle is over. People mostly look at past cycles to determine how theirs will go.
If some 160 3.0 thinks they're getting into GULC, that's delusional, not the result of of LSN. I also note that my numbers aren't accurate and will be updated at the end of the cycle.
Not entirely true - past cycles aren't always as reflective as the current one. Just ask the folks who were waiting in the UT thread about their GPA or all the folks who were deferred at Cornell. I've paid a great deal attention, maybe just as much as the previous cycles, to the profiles applying to this cycle. That being said, your profile always made it quite obvious that your numbers are fudged, and that's fine, I just don't understand why people do that kind of thing. It always seemed a bit paranoid to me, but to each their own.
Oh, and for all the 160 3.0's out there, we're not delusional for applying to top schools like Georgetown. We can all have our dreams, eh? Isn't that what "reach" is anyway - taking a chance on a dream? It certainly isn't applying to a law school with a 170 LSAT and a 3.7 and worrying to death that you aren't going to get into a top school.