2010 February Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:56 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Check out Cambridgelsat.com.... so far I love it. I am also shooting for the Feb 2010 LSAT.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:12 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
LR is my weakest section...on LG and RC i miss a combined max of 6...usually less.
i took the powerscore prep course from oct-dec. am self-studying now. i have read all the bibles. but LR is still giving me trouble....i can miss anywhere from 7-16 on the two combined sections of LR
do you guys have any tips for improving that section? thanks!
i took the powerscore prep course from oct-dec. am self-studying now. i have read all the bibles. but LR is still giving me trouble....i can miss anywhere from 7-16 on the two combined sections of LR
do you guys have any tips for improving that section? thanks!
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
With the huge curve, I wish I decided to do that December re-take instead of Feb .
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:15 am
Re: 2010 February Study Group
.
Last edited by jocelyne on Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I think last year's Feb. curve was a -9. But I haven't seen a curve as high as this one since the tests in the 30's with the near-impossible LG sections. It seems like LSAC finally made the LR section a bit too hard for the time frame, hence the ultra-generous curve. I'm guessing they'll correct it for February, especially since it's undisclosed and the curve will go back to being tighter. I could kind of sense this was coming based on the LR section in September (first section harder, second section normal). I'm guessing LG was a touch easier than September and RC about the same.jocelyne wrote:Any idea Feb will be like Dec? I wish I had taken the Dec LSAT. My friends who took the Dec LSAT are so damn lucky.
I do really wish I took December now because I always own the PT's with the generous curves even if one section is particularly difficult.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nycsoul87
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Took PT 46 on Saturday. Not sure what I can take away from these PTs as I have taken them all before. No real choice though as I went through most of them in previous prep. Still it was my 1st LSAT PT in a while so anyways...
PT 46: 176 (-4)
RC (-0)
LR (-1)
LG exp from PT 21 (-3)
LG (-1)
LR (-2)
PT 46: 176 (-4)
RC (-0)
LR (-1)
LG exp from PT 21 (-3)
LG (-1)
LR (-2)
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Nice. I'm having my PT from Saturday scanned tomorrow. Will find out how I did, what I got wrong and what test it actually is (it's kind of nice not knowing because then I don't know what to expect; especially since I'm re-doing a lot of tests; luckily I don't remember 99% of the questions).
I'm getting December as a PT sometime before the February test, so now I'm curious to see what happens with that one.
I'm getting December as a PT sometime before the February test, so now I'm curious to see what happens with that one.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:36 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Question about retaking the test in February...are you guys applying for 2010 or 2011?
I'm disappointed with my December score (only a 2 point improvement from June). I'd like to retake in Feb, but I'm not sure how schools will treat a score that arrives so late in the cycle. Any thoughts?
I'm disappointed with my December score (only a 2 point improvement from June). I'd like to retake in Feb, but I'm not sure how schools will treat a score that arrives so late in the cycle. Any thoughts?
- nycsoul87
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Even though I took the Sept, Dec and going to take the Feb LSAT, my plan all along was to apply for 2011. There is still some value in retaking in Feb for people applying this cycle though- u might get pulled off waitlists or get more $$$ if u score higher
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I'm applying this cycle, but I'm re-taking from the September test and my applications are already sent. If your applications are already out, it probably doesn't matter, although a lot of schools will hold your applications until after the February test, so be forwarned that it may put a huge "hold" on your cycle (as it's done for mine and which I'm not terribly happy with).lilac2010 wrote:Question about retaking the test in February...are you guys applying for 2010 or 2011?
I'm disappointed with my December score (only a 2 point improvement from June). I'd like to retake in Feb, but I'm not sure how schools will treat a score that arrives so late in the cycle. Any thoughts?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:36 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Hold my applications until after the Feb. scores are released? That's terrible. I'd rather not wait until the very end of the cycle. Not sure what to do now. So disappointed in my December score
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I agree. But I think in the long run, it would be better for me to try and improve my score and have to wait until the end of the cycle than not re-take (I only had a 162 and probably should have gotten a 164-165 based on my PT's and screwing up the easiest LG on the entire September test).lilac2010 wrote:Hold my applications until after the Feb. scores are released? That's terrible. I'd rather not wait until the very end of the cycle. Not sure what to do now. So disappointed in my December score
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:15 am
Re: 2010 February Study Group
.
Last edited by jocelyne on Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I don't know. I put it on all of my applications since I registered before I applied. If you applied already I have no clue if they see it or not.jocelyne wrote:do schools see as soon as we register for the LSAT? contemplating June if that's the case.keg411 wrote:I'm applying this cycle, but I'm re-taking from the September test and my applications are already sent. If your applications are already out, it probably doesn't matter, although a lot of schools will hold your applications until after the February test, so be forwarned that it may put a huge "hold" on your cycle (as it's done for mine and which I'm not terribly happy with).lilac2010 wrote:Question about retaking the test in February...are you guys applying for 2010 or 2011?
I'm disappointed with my December score (only a 2 point improvement from June). I'd like to retake in Feb, but I'm not sure how schools will treat a score that arrives so late in the cycle. Any thoughts?
- nycsoul87
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:44 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I know I just posted my results from Saturday but I actually just finished taking PT 47 and finished with another score in the mid-170s
PT 47: 174 (-6)
LR1 (-2)
RC (-3)
LG experimental from PT 22: (-0)
LR2 (-1)
LG (-0)
My plan is to take a PT every other day, going through them in order from PT 46 to the december 2009 lsat (PT 59). I will take a one week break from Jan 4-10 (going to Cabo!) and then buckle down until Feb 1st before taking the last few days off just to relax a bit.
This thread might start becoming more active as more people start thinking about retaking. Good luck, fellow Feb LSATers!
PT 47: 174 (-6)
LR1 (-2)
RC (-3)
LG experimental from PT 22: (-0)
LR2 (-1)
LG (-0)
My plan is to take a PT every other day, going through them in order from PT 46 to the december 2009 lsat (PT 59). I will take a one week break from Jan 4-10 (going to Cabo!) and then buckle down until Feb 1st before taking the last few days off just to relax a bit.
This thread might start becoming more active as more people start thinking about retaking. Good luck, fellow Feb LSATers!
Last edited by nycsoul87 on Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Got my Saturday test scored today. PT49.
RC: -3
LR1: -5
LR2: -3
LG: -1
(RC Experimental: -6; no clue what test it was from)
Raw Score: 88
Scaled Score: 168
Great start to my re-take studying (and I'd be totally happy with this in Feb). Will probably do another PT this Saturday and do some work in the bibles in between now and then.
RC: -3
LR1: -5
LR2: -3
LG: -1
(RC Experimental: -6; no clue what test it was from)
Raw Score: 88
Scaled Score: 168
Great start to my re-take studying (and I'd be totally happy with this in Feb). Will probably do another PT this Saturday and do some work in the bibles in between now and then.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:12 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
advice for improving LR would be appreciated
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- birD
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:49 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
have you memorized all the flaw types and do you completely understand logic (some and most train stuff)?advice for improving LR would be appreciated
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:07 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I've decided to rewrite as well, so I will join this thread. =)
Last edited by Canadian89 on Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:19 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
Any idea how I can raise my scores I had 140s for my first test. English is not my native language......I need a decent school. So ideas of pushing the 140s into 160s?
- risktaker
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:10 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I am in it too. Got a 156. Need to raise 10 pts or more. Was pt'ing at 165-170. I bombed RC and so need to work on that section.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:27 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
I am in as well. I received a 160 which is not going to cut it. Tanked RC with a -12 and a -13 on both LR. I was PTing a lot higher so I need to bear down for the month ahead.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
why did you get 140s? Did you not finish the test, or got a lot wrong? what was the main problem for you? English is not my native language neither but I have had 15 years of practice so maybe I can try to give you some advice. Feel free to PM me if you don't want to tell me your numbers/breakdown openly.mikael wrote:Any idea how I can raise my scores I had 140s for my first test. English is not my native language......I need a decent school. So ideas of pushing the 140s into 160s?
- llawguru
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:56 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
This is a prime example of how people lie on this board.politics wrote:I am in as well. I received a 160 which is not going to cut it. Tanked RC with a -12 and a -13 on both LR. I was PTing a lot higher so I need to bear down for the month ahead.
He said he received a 160 with the following:
RC: -12
LR: -13
LR: -13
LG: ????? (Lets assume -0)
Total wrong: 38
Total correct: 63
This would be a score of 154 for December 2009 LSAT.
If he is referring to September 2009 LSAT his score would be: 153.
how pathetic.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:53 pm
Re: 2010 February Study Group
-13 on both LR can very well mean 37/50. Not sure why you wouldn't assume that first.llawguru wrote:This is a prime example of how people lie on this board.politics wrote:I am in as well. I received a 160 which is not going to cut it. Tanked RC with a -12 and a -13 on both LR. I was PTing a lot higher so I need to bear down for the month ahead.
He said he received a 160 with the following:
RC: -12
LR: -13
LR: -13
LG: ????? (Lets assume -0)
Total wrong: 38
Total correct: 63
This would be a score of 154 for December 2009 LSAT.
If he is referring to September 2009 LSAT his score would be: 153.
how pathetic.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login