forza wrote:Alright. It's time for a Fuck the LSAT rant.
PT 49 (June 2006)
LG: -2 (20/22; a couple stupid errors, but I can live with it)
LR1: -4 (22/26; ugh, I missed 3 of the 5 I circled... this section seemed ridiculously hard)
RC: -2 (25/27; science passage fucked me up a little bit... both misses were on that one)
LR2: -4 (21/25)
Okay, FUCK this second LR section. For one, it says at the top of the first page that it's only got 22 questions. Nice job, LSAC. Thanks for the false joy I got outta that one. (Check your PrepTests if you don't believe me).
Two, I changed my answer on #8 from A (correct) to D (incorrect). I think it's because answer choice D mentions "many" ancient plants, whereas the stimulus mentions only "unique" plants. But then answer choice A only says "pollens," it doesn't offer any sort of quantifying word there. What the fuck?
Three, #18 is the dumbest fucking assumption question I've ever seen.
Four, why is #19 A instead of B? I am dumbfounded here.
Five, #23? WTF?!
PT 49 is just an all-around fail. On my part and LSAC's. I thought after acing the LG and RC sections I'd be golden to get a 170+, and then I go fucking -8 on LR. With a -10 curve. AGHHHRHRHHGHHG.
I took this a while ago but I think I score similarly. Not a fan of PT 49. Also, I totally remember the wrong # of questions listed which also threw me off!! RAWR, LSAC.