February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember? Forum
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:34 pm
February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
I can't stop thinking about the February 2007 LSAT. It was the first official LSAT I'd taken, though I had taken some practice tests. I was wondering if anyone could remember any specific details of the test they'd like to discuss. Like any questions that stumped them or any stimuli they thought were cute or funny. I'm trying to piece it all together to get a better sense of my own performance. I don't remember it all that well, because I hadn't slept well the night before (should tell me right there how well I did). Anyway, here's what I remember:
Order:
1. AR (22 questions experimental)
2. RC (28 questions)
3. LR (25 questions)
break
4. AR (22 questions)
5. LR (26 questions)
writing
RC prompts
1. Social Science?
2. Humanities?
3. Physical Science: Evolutionary development kinship identification in different species of animal
4. Law: Something about divorce law and human capital?
AR Logic games (that counted)
1.
2. Grouping: Picking birds to include in a cage
3. Matching/Sequencing: Computer merchants and their pricing
4. Matching/Sequencing: Student and professor college dorms and their proximity to main campus
LR
I only remember 2 details about the second section. There was one question involving formal logic toward the end that took the most time. It was about apes and their ability to identify themselves in the mirror. It was one of those inference questions where the correct answer did not come from deducing something new but from contraposing or identifying some intermediary part of the logic.
I also remember a question toward the beginning, question 5 or 7, about the Loch Ness monster. This question pissed me off. The argument was something like "Many people have seen the Loch Ness monster. Therefore it exists." and we had to find the flaw. I was torn between "fails to acknowledge why there are no pictures" and "fails to recognize that there are other explanations for people's sightings." I went with the latter, but I don't know, there could have been another better answer that I overlooked.
I know this is a bit obsessive, but sharing this stuff has been cathartic and will help me get to the point where I get my score back. I look forward to what other people share.
Order:
1. AR (22 questions experimental)
2. RC (28 questions)
3. LR (25 questions)
break
4. AR (22 questions)
5. LR (26 questions)
writing
RC prompts
1. Social Science?
2. Humanities?
3. Physical Science: Evolutionary development kinship identification in different species of animal
4. Law: Something about divorce law and human capital?
AR Logic games (that counted)
1.
2. Grouping: Picking birds to include in a cage
3. Matching/Sequencing: Computer merchants and their pricing
4. Matching/Sequencing: Student and professor college dorms and their proximity to main campus
LR
I only remember 2 details about the second section. There was one question involving formal logic toward the end that took the most time. It was about apes and their ability to identify themselves in the mirror. It was one of those inference questions where the correct answer did not come from deducing something new but from contraposing or identifying some intermediary part of the logic.
I also remember a question toward the beginning, question 5 or 7, about the Loch Ness monster. This question pissed me off. The argument was something like "Many people have seen the Loch Ness monster. Therefore it exists." and we had to find the flaw. I was torn between "fails to acknowledge why there are no pictures" and "fails to recognize that there are other explanations for people's sightings." I went with the latter, but I don't know, there could have been another better answer that I overlooked.
I know this is a bit obsessive, but sharing this stuff has been cathartic and will help me get to the point where I get my score back. I look forward to what other people share.
- OregonGirl07
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:15 pm
- llawguru
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:56 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
bump for Feb '10 takers.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Vincent Vega
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
Why?llawguru wrote:bump for Feb '10 takers.
- llawguru
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:56 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
we might be taking this same test. since they are reused?
- Vincent Vega
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
You must be kidding.
- llawguru
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:56 pm
- 5ky
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
.
Last edited by 5ky on Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
I love the avatar of the user that posted this.5ky wrote:This bump was a huge fail.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:17 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
they just reused it for the test in asia and the monday one so i really don't think they'd use it again now
- Bikeflip
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
Yay chicken teriyaki. No, I will not share.
- Panther7
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:34 pm
Re: February 2007 LSAT---What do you remember?
i seriously lol'dllawguru wrote:we might be taking this same test. since they are reused?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login