Definitely the ideological one for me as well. I actually didn't find the museum LG to be too troublesome. Or maybe that's just some unjustified arrogance on my part.casskow12 wrote:I had:
LG
LR
LG
RC
LR
If you had the weird sequencing game about the museum I can confirm that was the real logic games section. Felt poorly for me on this test. M average across 20 PTs was 176 and for this I’d be shocked if I get above a 175 or above. Forgot to bubble in an answer choice on RC and I thought the LR sections were hard in an unusual way. At least for me, it felt like there were more questions that were harder earlier on than there usually are. I.E the nuclear one the ideological media one and the Japanese bell one. Also think the garden seed one got me too.
The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:07 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 11:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
DKM wrote:That's good news for me then. I had that section first.StetsonU wrote:
Th real LG had to do with an upper and lower lecture hall and a game about Econ classes and their pre requisites
LG
LR
LG
RC
LR
How are you able to tell which was experimental and which was real?
Also I didn't finish the very last question on my first LG set and for some reason didn't fill in a random circle. I kept debating on sneaking in a random guess but my stupid conscience got the best of me. I hope I'm rewarded with some good mojo on the rest of the test because of this..
I had the same order but I remember those games being in section 3...?
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:48 am
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
In one of my 2game sections, 1 game was about store and ultra store and Another game was about libraries main or neighborhood.
Anyone else see this? Or was this my experimental?
Anyone else see this? Or was this my experimental?
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:07 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
I think that was your experimental. I only had one LG section and those weren't on it I'm pretty sure.
i also had 3 LR sections. So one of those had to be the experimental. I wish I had had two LG sections instead. Those are so much more fun than LR!
i also had 3 LR sections. So one of those had to be the experimental. I wish I had had two LG sections instead. Those are so much more fun than LR!
- Bartlet4President
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:27 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
casskow12 wrote:Are there any people who were going for a 174+ On here? If so how did you feel?
You are on TLS...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bartlet4President
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:27 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Fact: the game about an unknown man and an unknown woman was the real sextion
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:15 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Im from New Zealand and my one went
RC
LR
RC
LR
LG
The two RC sections killed me!!
Anyone else have this?
RC
LR
RC
LR
LG
The two RC sections killed me!!
Anyone else have this?
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 8:51 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Hey, I'm not sure how detailed we can be, but would someone feel comfortable pm'ing about that amazon sustainable trees question?
- Bartlet4President
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:27 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Do people that had only 2 LR sections remember how many Questions were in the two sections?
- DKM
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
25 perBartlet4President wrote:Do people that had only 2 LR sections remember how many Questions were in the two sections?
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
The second LG was hard as fuck. I hope that was experimental or I am toast.jag9953 wrote:I had
LG 23
LR 25
LG 23
RC 27
LR 25.
First section of games I didn't get to the last set.
Second of games, the last 2 games were so weird and were about who goes where, (it had 3 layers each) it totally threw me off. The rules so awkward and frustrating.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Do you recall, was that section 1 or 3?casskow12 wrote:I had:
LG
LR
LG
RC
LR
If you had the weird sequencing game about the museum I can confirm that was the real logic games section. Felt poorly for me on this test. M average across 20 PTs was 176 and for this I’d be shocked if I get above a 175 or above. Forgot to bubble in an answer choice on RC and I thought the LR sections were hard in an unusual way. At least for me, it felt like there were more questions that were harder earlier on than there usually are. I.E the nuclear one the ideological media one and the Japanese bell one. Also think the garden seed one got me too.
- DKM
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
I could have sworn it was section 1 for me, mostly because I remember being anxious and making multiple diagrams for the u/l lecture hall question before I was able to get in my zone. I remember the last game of section 3 for me was about a craft show, if that helps.Roadto180 wrote:DKM wrote:That's good news for me then. I had that section first.StetsonU wrote:
Th real LG had to do with an upper and lower lecture hall and a game about Econ classes and their pre requisites
LG
LR
LG
RC
LR
How are you able to tell which was experimental and which was real?
Also I didn't finish the very last question on my first LG set and for some reason didn't fill in a random circle. I kept debating on sneaking in a random guess but my stupid conscience got the best of me. I hope I'm rewarded with some good mojo on the rest of the test because of this..
I had the same order but I remember those games being in section 3...?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:38 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Here's a list of the real and experimental sections, for those who've not seen one yet: https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=16485Law 202x wrote:The second LG was hard as fuck. I hope that was experimental or I am toast.jag9953 wrote:I had
LG 23
LR 25
LG 23
RC 27
LR 25.
First section of games I didn't get to the last set.
Second of games, the last 2 games were so weird and were about who goes where, (it had 3 layers each) it totally threw me off. The rules so awkward and frustrating.
- DKM
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Thank you for this.239840 wrote:Here's a list of the real and experimental sections, for those who've not seen one yet: https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=16485Law 202x wrote:The second LG was hard as fuck. I hope that was experimental or I am toast.jag9953 wrote:I had
LG 23
LR 25
LG 23
RC 27
LR 25.
First section of games I didn't get to the last set.
Second of games, the last 2 games were so weird and were about who goes where, (it had 3 layers each) it totally threw me off. The rules so awkward and frustrating.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Oh great, then I'm in the clear. People who have seen my recent posts know that LG is my crappiest section but I feel like Saturday's was close to being one of my best LG sections I've ever done. It seemed too easy at first so when I saw Section III I was like oh crap, that may have been the experimental! And I just drudged through Section III, I bombed it. In multiple regards, I felt this was an easier test than some of the PTs I have taken.239840 wrote:Here's a list of the real and experimental sections, for those who've not seen one yet: https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=16485Law 202x wrote:The second LG was hard as fuck. I hope that was experimental or I am toast.jag9953 wrote:I had
LG 23
LR 25
LG 23
RC 27
LR 25.
First section of games I didn't get to the last set.
Second of games, the last 2 games were so weird and were about who goes where, (it had 3 layers each) it totally threw me off. The rules so awkward and frustrating.
- Duckhat
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 10:37 am
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
LG
LR
LG
RC
LR
This was the IDEAL order for me!
The unknown man/woman game was so zany, I rather enjoyed it. The other games didn't feel especially hard so hoping for -0/-1.
Looking at a range of -13 to -6 overall so fingers crossed. Anything below 170 will be a retake unfortunately. Not looking forward to gearing up to study again!
LR
LG
RC
LR
This was the IDEAL order for me!
The unknown man/woman game was so zany, I rather enjoyed it. The other games didn't feel especially hard so hoping for -0/-1.
Looking at a range of -13 to -6 overall so fingers crossed. Anything below 170 will be a retake unfortunately. Not looking forward to gearing up to study again!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- DKM
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Did anybody think that the RC seemed a bit easier than usual? Normally my biggest problem with RC has always been trying to stay interested in the material enough to understand and process it. I don't know if these passages were inherently more interesting or I maybe I was just more focused for some reason. It's weird because after taking the Feb exam I actually feel more worried about how I did on LR than RC or LG, and that has never happened to me, even on a preptest.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:07 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
I agree, I really enjoyed all of the RC passages. I enjoyed the general topic of the Bok lying one, but I thought the questions either were not very precisely worded or unnecessarily confusing or that wrong answers were wrong because for abnormally tricky small minutiae involved in their wordings.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 11:37 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
SAME HERE!! RC is usually my worse section and I think this time around it might have been my best section. Shocking.DKM wrote:Did anybody think that the RC seemed a bit easier than usual? Normally my biggest problem with RC has always been trying to stay interested in the material enough to understand and process it. I don't know if these passages were inherently more interesting or I maybe I was just more focused for some reason. It's weird because after taking the Feb exam I actually feel more worried about how I did on LR than RC or LG, and that has never happened to me, even on a preptest.
- Bartlet4President
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:27 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Roadto180 wrote:SAME HERE!! RC is usually my worse section and I think this time around it might have been my best section. Shocking.DKM wrote:Did anybody think that the RC seemed a bit easier than usual? Normally my biggest problem with RC has always been trying to stay interested in the material enough to understand and process it. I don't know if these passages were inherently more interesting or I maybe I was just more focused for some reason. It's weird because after taking the Feb exam I actually feel more worried about how I did on LR than RC or LG, and that has never happened to me, even on a preptest.
Had children squealing and playing in the hallway during my second passage... aggravating
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:23 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Seems like I can't tell what my LG experimental was. Powerscore reports that the one with the econ classes waas the real one, which also included the museum game. But I feel like the econ one was in the first game section and the museum on the second game section. I'm completely confused
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:05 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
We took it in an auditorium so I got to sit in one of those cushioned seats with the little foldover desk. It was so comfortable, up until about the fourth section when I kept feeling the need to get up and stretch. I attribute part of my good performance to the excellent chair that I sat in. It was also as cold as heck in there so to have a fabric cushion to retain some of my heat instead of a cold hard plastic chair was an asset.
- Bartlet4President
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:27 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
[quote="esqhopefulhilton"]Seems like I can't tell what my LG experimental was. Powerscore reports that the one with the econ classes waas the real one, which also included the museum game. But I feel like the econ one was in the first game section and the museum on the second game section. I'm completely confused[/quote
Definitely museum real. My only section
Definitely museum real. My only section
- Bartlet4President
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:27 pm
Re: The Official February 2018 Waiters Thread
Law 202x wrote:We took it in an auditorium so I got to sit in one of those cushioned seats with the little foldover desk. It was so comfortable, up until about the fourth section when I kept feeling the need to get up and stretch. I attribute part of my good performance to the excellent chair that I sat in. It was also as cold as heck in there so to have a fabric cushion to retain some of my heat instead of a cold hard plastic chair was an asset.
I would fly to that location !!!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login