Winning Strategy for 4th Take Forum
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Hello Everyone,
Unfortunately, I didn't do well in Sept or Dec and need to retake for the schools I want to go to. I scored ~10 pts off my PT average twice in a row.
My very first-take Sept 2016 which i studied part-time for 3 mo I used the PS Books. I really didnt spend enough time this take and it was rushed. Should have def post-poned but was trying to throw a hail mary to get into the app cycle that yr.
For my second and third take (the first really focused full time i prepped) i used the Trainer and the MH books, cambridge packets and 7sage videos. I felt like i liked the MH books much more than PS (felt less gimmicky). is this misguided?
The only section I have managed to crush on test-day like my PTs is LG (-1) and attribute my success 100% to 7sage LG videos.
Right now, I have evaluated the situation deeply and it isnt nerves or anxiety that i can identify(i.e I felt great during my last take unlike the first two and wasnt nervous), however, burn out could have been a factor since I was studying full time like an animal for 6 mo and i think i could have been overconfident or was overthinking during the exam. for some reason it seems like LR under the gun of the real thing I throw my strategies out the window and shoot from the hip. I think this is also because the fundamentals arent fully-engrained in my head where in a pressured situation i can use them flawlessly. I think throughout both tests i didnt spend enough time on the fundamentals and rushed to drilling and PTs in Mass quantity creating weaknesses in my foundation along the way.
This has brought me back to the drawing board and moving forward i plan to take June 2018 with a WINNING STRATEGY to a 170+.
I really liked the 7sage LG videos and all the study strategies and useful material JY has put out so i think my best course of action is to take the online course Ultimate+. I feel like learning from such videos and explanations as provided by the 7sage curriculum are in line with my learning style.
Since i do have 6 mo (although I will now be working full-time) I think i will have enough time to utilize 7sage ultimate and revisit a book. I think i will def revisit the trainer and was wondering if I should manhattan after finishing 7sage? or maybe PS or another book? In Dec thread people talked about the FOX book? Im not familiar with this. Any thoughts on this
In sum, my question for you all, is this a good plan, what should I add to the strategy and what advice does anyone have whose been in my position or just some hindsight LSAT advice?
Thanks so much in advance! This community along my journey to becoming a LSAT Warrior is more than appreciated and I am so thankful for you all. Happy Holidays !
Cheers.
Unfortunately, I didn't do well in Sept or Dec and need to retake for the schools I want to go to. I scored ~10 pts off my PT average twice in a row.
My very first-take Sept 2016 which i studied part-time for 3 mo I used the PS Books. I really didnt spend enough time this take and it was rushed. Should have def post-poned but was trying to throw a hail mary to get into the app cycle that yr.
For my second and third take (the first really focused full time i prepped) i used the Trainer and the MH books, cambridge packets and 7sage videos. I felt like i liked the MH books much more than PS (felt less gimmicky). is this misguided?
The only section I have managed to crush on test-day like my PTs is LG (-1) and attribute my success 100% to 7sage LG videos.
Right now, I have evaluated the situation deeply and it isnt nerves or anxiety that i can identify(i.e I felt great during my last take unlike the first two and wasnt nervous), however, burn out could have been a factor since I was studying full time like an animal for 6 mo and i think i could have been overconfident or was overthinking during the exam. for some reason it seems like LR under the gun of the real thing I throw my strategies out the window and shoot from the hip. I think this is also because the fundamentals arent fully-engrained in my head where in a pressured situation i can use them flawlessly. I think throughout both tests i didnt spend enough time on the fundamentals and rushed to drilling and PTs in Mass quantity creating weaknesses in my foundation along the way.
This has brought me back to the drawing board and moving forward i plan to take June 2018 with a WINNING STRATEGY to a 170+.
I really liked the 7sage LG videos and all the study strategies and useful material JY has put out so i think my best course of action is to take the online course Ultimate+. I feel like learning from such videos and explanations as provided by the 7sage curriculum are in line with my learning style.
Since i do have 6 mo (although I will now be working full-time) I think i will have enough time to utilize 7sage ultimate and revisit a book. I think i will def revisit the trainer and was wondering if I should manhattan after finishing 7sage? or maybe PS or another book? In Dec thread people talked about the FOX book? Im not familiar with this. Any thoughts on this
In sum, my question for you all, is this a good plan, what should I add to the strategy and what advice does anyone have whose been in my position or just some hindsight LSAT advice?
Thanks so much in advance! This community along my journey to becoming a LSAT Warrior is more than appreciated and I am so thankful for you all. Happy Holidays !
Cheers.
Last edited by Rupert Pupkin on Tue Dec 26, 2017 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:14 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Super motivated after seeing this as I didn't hit my target score either. Keep it up!
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Haha thanks! What are you doing for the retake?damask_rain wrote:Super motivated after seeing this as I didn't hit my target score either. Keep it up!
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:14 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
I think I am going to redo ALL the Logic Games using the 7sage method. I got -4 if I am not mistaken. I am also going to work on stress, meditation, and timing. I panicked at the very beginning of the test (first 15 mins) and missed 6 questions of LR from the first 12. I have never experienced anything like that on my PTs. I usually finish the first 15 questions in the first 8-10 mins and get -0. I'll work full time and redo all the PTs.I hope to do an hour of studying a day. I feel like studying too much is just going to be counterproductive at this point.Rupert Pupkin wrote:Haha thanks! What are you doing for the retake?damask_rain wrote:Super motivated after seeing this as I didn't hit my target score either. Keep it up!
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Solid. Yeah I hear that. I think studying too much without days off actually screwed me in the end. I think during the test I had slight underconfidence as well due to burn out possibly. I just want to make sure my foundation is super solid and progress consistently. I think working full time is going to actually help me. keep me from "over-doing" it haha. Well see. Best of luck!damask_rain wrote:I think I am going to redo ALL the Logic Games using the 7sage method. I got -4 if I am not mistaken. I am also going to work on stress, meditation, and timing. I panicked at the very beginning of the test (first 15 mins) and missed 6 questions of LR from the first 12. I have never experienced anything like that on my PTs. I usually finish the first 15 questions in the first 8-10 mins and get -0. I'll work full time and redo all the PTs.I hope to do an hour of studying a day. I feel like studying too much is just going to be counterproductive at this point.Rupert Pupkin wrote:Haha thanks! What are you doing for the retake?damask_rain wrote:Super motivated after seeing this as I didn't hit my target score either. Keep it up!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 8:09 am
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Try to stay as motivated as possible and blind review! Also would recommend 6 section tests. I scored roughly the same on my first 3 tests and finally got a 5 point increase on this last one. Don't give up!
- olympia
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:49 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
It sounds like you have bad test anxiety come test-day; I do, too. I’m taking the June test as well (for the first time), and I’m scared that my test anxiety will kick in as soon as the test is handed to me. Have you done PTs in public? I hear that helps. I’ll be doing that many times when I am ready to do PTs.
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Pumpkin! Sorry to hear that December didn't go as well as it should have
I think that since you scored so far below your PT average, that could point to either nerves (maybe at a subconscious level, by the sounds of it) and/or just not having your strategies engrained to the point where they are second-nature.
Since you have a good amount of time until June, I'd probably take a couple weeks off from studying to let your motivation and pre-conceived notions reset, if that makes any sense. That way, once you start studying again you'll be fresh and can maybe evaluate things from a new perspective.
I'd also make sure you are making your PTs as close to the real thing as possible (i.e. take them at the exact same time as the test, same pre-test routine, same break times, same location if possible, etc).
It sounds like you've got LG down as well, so I probably wouldn't change anything up there once you start studying again. I personally only used Blueprint and the Cambridge packets when I studied and I liked their stuff quite a bit - but I can't speak to the Trainer or Manhattan books. If you can afford it, the Blueprint online course was pretty good I thought, especially for LR (and LG, but like I said I would just stick with 7sage for that in your case). For RC, I personally kind of did my own thing in the end (no notating at all, for example), but I did use some of their strategies to an extent. I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit. The last thing that I think helped me a lot was BRing so much to the point where I'd kind of do a pseudo-BR in a live test situation - crossing off each incorrect answer for a concrete reason and selecting TCR for a concrete reason as well. This is how you will know your strategies are second-nature because you'll be able to do this even within the time constraints.
I also post this often but really do believe in it - meditation. If you start now, and are consistent/serious with your practice, you can really see some strong benefits from meditation by June IMO.
I think that since you scored so far below your PT average, that could point to either nerves (maybe at a subconscious level, by the sounds of it) and/or just not having your strategies engrained to the point where they are second-nature.
Since you have a good amount of time until June, I'd probably take a couple weeks off from studying to let your motivation and pre-conceived notions reset, if that makes any sense. That way, once you start studying again you'll be fresh and can maybe evaluate things from a new perspective.
I'd also make sure you are making your PTs as close to the real thing as possible (i.e. take them at the exact same time as the test, same pre-test routine, same break times, same location if possible, etc).
It sounds like you've got LG down as well, so I probably wouldn't change anything up there once you start studying again. I personally only used Blueprint and the Cambridge packets when I studied and I liked their stuff quite a bit - but I can't speak to the Trainer or Manhattan books. If you can afford it, the Blueprint online course was pretty good I thought, especially for LR (and LG, but like I said I would just stick with 7sage for that in your case). For RC, I personally kind of did my own thing in the end (no notating at all, for example), but I did use some of their strategies to an extent. I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit. The last thing that I think helped me a lot was BRing so much to the point where I'd kind of do a pseudo-BR in a live test situation - crossing off each incorrect answer for a concrete reason and selecting TCR for a concrete reason as well. This is how you will know your strategies are second-nature because you'll be able to do this even within the time constraints.
I also post this often but really do believe in it - meditation. If you start now, and are consistent/serious with your practice, you can really see some strong benefits from meditation by June IMO.
- olympia
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:49 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.somethingElse wrote:Pumpkin! Sorry to hear that December didn't go as well as it should have
I think that since you scored so far below your PT average, that could point to either nerves (maybe at a subconscious level, by the sounds of it) and/or just not having your strategies engrained to the point where they are second-nature.
Since you have a good amount of time until June, I'd probably take a couple weeks off from studying to let your motivation and pre-conceived notions reset, if that makes any sense. That way, once you start studying again you'll be fresh and can maybe evaluate things from a new perspective.
I'd also make sure you are making your PTs as close to the real thing as possible (i.e. take them at the exact same time as the test, same pre-test routine, same break times, same location if possible, etc).
It sounds like you've got LG down as well, so I probably wouldn't change anything up there once you start studying again. I personally only used Blueprint and the Cambridge packets when I studied and I liked their stuff quite a bit - but I can't speak to the Trainer or Manhattan books. If you can afford it, the Blueprint online course was pretty good I thought, especially for LR (and LG, but like I said I would just stick with 7sage for that in your case). For RC, I personally kind of did my own thing in the end (no notating at all, for example), but I did use some of their strategies to an extent. I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit. The last thing that I think helped me a lot was BRing so much to the point where I'd kind of do a pseudo-BR in a live test situation - crossing off each incorrect answer for a concrete reason and selecting TCR for a concrete reason as well. This is how you will know your strategies are second-nature because you'll be able to do this even within the time constraints.
I also post this often but really do believe in it - meditation. If you start now, and are consistent/serious with your practice, you can really see some strong benefits from meditation by June IMO.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
I personally just read Infinite Jest as my dense material. Not only was it definitely denser than the LSAT but it was a really really good book too. It also was a nice break from the, IMO, usually bland lsat passages. I think that (i.e. a dense fiction book) is one way you could go.olympia wrote:This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
Considering you're looking to improve your reading for structure most of all, you may look into a book about some topic in philosophy. I was a philosophy major in college and I think that the stuff I read helped prepare me for RC really well.
- olympia
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:49 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Thank you.somethingElse wrote:I personally just read Infinite Jest as my dense material. Not only was it definitely denser than the LSAT but it was a really really good book too. It also was a nice break from the, IMO, usually bland lsat passages. I think that (i.e. a dense fiction book) is one way you could go.olympia wrote:This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
Considering you're looking to improve your reading for structure most of all, you may look into a book about some topic in philosophy. I was a philosophy major in college and I think that the stuff I read helped prepare me for RC really well.
Do you have any good philosophy book recommendations?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:49 am
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
You can always take a look at the bibliography/acknowledgments from old tests, and read assorted articles from the sources used by LSAC for -- as you say -- structure. The list is pretty eclectic (including fringe-/pseudo-science journals), but The Atlantic and Scientific American tend to crop up a lot. Many of the comp passages are based on law review articles.
I would normally never argue against eclectic reading habits in general (from "Beowulf ... to the backs of cornflakes packets," as the novelist David Lodge once put it) but for LSAT purposes, I am not sure. The problem is that LSAC often "adapt" the texts, abridge, remove metaphors and stylistic flourishes, proper nouns, etc., remove the flesh and sort of boil them down to their skeletal structure. I am not a fan of this, but that's why the best practice is probably old RC passages.
Take a look at this (I hope this short LSAT snippet -- part of an RC paragraph -- constitutes fair use; if not, I would be happy to remove it:
I would normally never argue against eclectic reading habits in general (from "Beowulf ... to the backs of cornflakes packets," as the novelist David Lodge once put it) but for LSAT purposes, I am not sure. The problem is that LSAC often "adapt" the texts, abridge, remove metaphors and stylistic flourishes, proper nouns, etc., remove the flesh and sort of boil them down to their skeletal structure. I am not a fan of this, but that's why the best practice is probably old RC passages.
Take a look at this (I hope this short LSAT snippet -- part of an RC paragraph -- constitutes fair use; if not, I would be happy to remove it:
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
That will depend on how familiar you are with philosophy/what you are interested in. The Reddit philosophy page has a good recommended list: https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/wiki/readinglistolympia wrote:Thank you.somethingElse wrote:I personally just read Infinite Jest as my dense material. Not only was it definitely denser than the LSAT but it was a really really good book too. It also was a nice break from the, IMO, usually bland lsat passages. I think that (i.e. a dense fiction book) is one way you could go.olympia wrote:This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
Considering you're looking to improve your reading for structure most of all, you may look into a book about some topic in philosophy. I was a philosophy major in college and I think that the stuff I read helped prepare me for RC really well.
Do you have any good philosophy book recommendations?
I think that if you aren't familiar with philosophy, Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell would be a good one. If you are more familiar, I'd pick a topic that interests you and then choose something from that recommended list - looking through it, they are pretty solid choices. Personally I though epistemology was really interesting and I liked reading David Hume, so you might also choose something by him.
A Critique of Pure Reason by Kant is one that I'd only recommend if you're familiar with philosophy as well. It will be WAY more dense than anything the LSAT throws at you, so it has that going for it, but it's translated and the writing style is very different from what you will see on the LSAT, to the point where I'm kind of on the fence as to whether it will be helpful. That's the main book that comes to mind, for me, as far as something insanely dense that will make the LSAT seem like cake.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- goldenflash19
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
I followed the noodlyone’s guide on here to the letter on my fourth take and it helped me break through. Would highly recommend. Good luck!!
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:41 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
olympia wrote:Thank you.somethingElse wrote:I personally just read Infinite Jest as my dense material. Not only was it definitely denser than the LSAT but it was a really really good book too. It also was a nice break from the, IMO, usually bland lsat passages. I think that (i.e. a dense fiction book) is one way you could go.olympia wrote:This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
Considering you're looking to improve your reading for structure most of all, you may look into a book about some topic in philosophy. I was a philosophy major in college and I think that the stuff I read helped prepare me for RC really well.
Do you have any good philosophy book recommendations?
Being a philosophy major myself, I personally would not recommend Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (CPR) if you're not at least somewhat familiar with some of the history/background/context of the work. Simply diving in will likely be a monumental waste of time. It's one of the densest and most convoluted texts I've ever read, and I needed the professional help of my professors to have even a moderate grasp of the passages we were assigned. The CPR isn't even assigned as a stand alone text until graduate school. Ditto for Kant's two other critiques (Judgement and Practical Reason) If you really wanna tackle Kant, I'd recommend his Anthropology. Significantly easier to read.
My personal recommendation would be Levinas' Totality and Infinity Much easier to read and understand than Kant in my view, yet dense enough to provide some good practice for RC.
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
Good points - Olympia, please disregard my mention of CPR.mdelacruz wrote:olympia wrote:Thank you.somethingElse wrote:I personally just read Infinite Jest as my dense material. Not only was it definitely denser than the LSAT but it was a really really good book too. It also was a nice break from the, IMO, usually bland lsat passages. I think that (i.e. a dense fiction book) is one way you could go.olympia wrote:This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
Considering you're looking to improve your reading for structure most of all, you may look into a book about some topic in philosophy. I was a philosophy major in college and I think that the stuff I read helped prepare me for RC really well.
Do you have any good philosophy book recommendations?
Being a philosophy major myself, I personally would not recommend Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (CPR) if you're not at least somewhat familiar with some of the history/background/context of the work. Simply diving in will likely be a monumental waste of time. It's one of the densest and most convoluted texts I've ever read, and I needed the professional help of my professors to have even a moderate grasp of the passages we were assigned. The CPR isn't even assigned as a stand alone text until graduate school. Ditto for Kant's two other critiques (Judgement and Practical Reason) If you really wanna tackle Kant, I'd recommend his Anthropology. Significantly easier to read.
My personal recommendation would be Levinas' Totality and Infinity Much easier to read and understand than Kant in my view, yet dense enough to provide some good practice for RC.
- olympia
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:49 pm
Re: Winning Strategy for 4th Take
No worries.somethingElse wrote:Good points - Olympia, please disregard my mention of CPR.mdelacruz wrote:olympia wrote:Thank you.somethingElse wrote:I personally just read Infinite Jest as my dense material. Not only was it definitely denser than the LSAT but it was a really really good book too. It also was a nice break from the, IMO, usually bland lsat passages. I think that (i.e. a dense fiction book) is one way you could go.olympia wrote:This is great advice, especially the pseudo-BR bit.
“I also read a lot of denser-than-LSAT stuff for RC and thought that helped quite a bit.”
Do you have any reading suggestions besides the Economist? I read the Economist daily as well as other academic publications, but I can’t see how this will help me with RC. I really struggle with reading for structure.
Considering you're looking to improve your reading for structure most of all, you may look into a book about some topic in philosophy. I was a philosophy major in college and I think that the stuff I read helped prepare me for RC really well.
Do you have any good philosophy book recommendations?
Being a philosophy major myself, I personally would not recommend Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (CPR) if you're not at least somewhat familiar with some of the history/background/context of the work. Simply diving in will likely be a monumental waste of time. It's one of the densest and most convoluted texts I've ever read, and I needed the professional help of my professors to have even a moderate grasp of the passages we were assigned. The CPR isn't even assigned as a stand alone text until graduate school. Ditto for Kant's two other critiques (Judgement and Practical Reason) If you really wanna tackle Kant, I'd recommend his Anthropology. Significantly easier to read.
My personal recommendation would be Levinas' Totality and Infinity Much easier to read and understand than Kant in my view, yet dense enough to provide some good practice for RC.
Thank you to the both of you for recommendations and your suggestions. Each has been duly noted.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login