Dec. Predictions Forum
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
I'm calling a weird game
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
I personally don't think the LSAT is going to change in what they give us because of the GRE. idkkiklavan wrote:See that’s what I thought but would it be smart to do that when 6 schools just opened up the GRE door?Mikey wrote:I'm calling a weird game
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
.
Last edited by kiklavan on Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
- sodomojo
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:17 am
Re: Dec. Predictions
Well how would that be any fair? If that does become the case, I don't see why the curve wouldn't just compensate as it always has.Platopus wrote:LSAC isn't going to miraculously start making the LSAT easier, and even if they did, it would be easier for everyone so in theory nothing would really change... Maybe you just need a 170 instead of a 168... but top 1% is still top 1% regardless if it is a 170 or a 175.
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
- april_ludgate
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:28 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
Aren't these tests created years in advance? Because they have to test them out in experimental sections first? So wouldn't the GRE or anything like that not have an affect for several years, if it had any at all?
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:53 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
april_ludgate wrote:Aren't these tests created years in advance? Because they have to test them out in experimental sections first? So wouldn't the GRE or anything like that not have an affect for several years, if it had any at all?
Last edited by Ntp73821 on Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
I think this pretty much sums it up...april_ludgate wrote:Aren't these tests created years in advance? Because they have to test them out in experimental sections first? So wouldn't the GRE or anything like that not have an affect for several years, if it had any at all?
Maybe they have an easier LG section in the pipeline though? Wishful thinking I'm sure
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- sodomojo
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:17 am
Re: Dec. Predictions
Oh yeah, well I meant unfair to people who took the test in the past when top 1% was only say a 170. Although I guess that would only matter for a brief period while you might still have applicants with scores from before. That's assuming that the percentiles change because LSAC is actively making the test easier of course. If the percentiles change because test takers are getting smarter (which seems to be what has happened over the last 10-20 years), then that's a non-issue.Platopus wrote:That's my point. It wouldn't be fair to people taking the test, and if the test were somehow to actually be easier, everyone would benefit so it wouldn't make a difference anyway.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
Tbh part of why I posted this is because there was a blog on Blueprint's website analyzing the Sep 2017 LSAT which suggested that LSAC might be loosening up a bit so I wanted to see if anyone here saw any merit in that
- april_ludgate
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:28 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
link?kiklavan wrote:Tbh part of why I posted this is because there was a blog on Blueprint's website analyzing the Sep 2017 LSAT which suggested that LSAC might be loosening up a bit so I wanted to see if anyone here saw any merit in that
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
- april_ludgate
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:28 pm
Re: Dec. Predictions
thanks!kiklavan wrote:http://blueprintlsat.com/lsatblog/lsat/ ... gic-games/april_ludgate wrote:link?kiklavan wrote:Tbh part of why I posted this is because there was a blog on Blueprint's website analyzing the Sep 2017 LSAT which suggested that LSAC might be loosening up a bit so I wanted to see if anyone here saw any merit in that
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: Dec. Predictions
kiklavan wrote:http://blueprintlsat.com/lsatblog/lsat/ ... gic-games/april_ludgate wrote:link?kiklavan wrote:Tbh part of why I posted this is because there was a blog on Blueprint's website analyzing the Sep 2017 LSAT which suggested that LSAC might be loosening up a bit so I wanted to see if anyone here saw any merit in that
This is pretty interesting. I mean we can only hope it's the reason and an easier test in December but I'm never a fan of hard RC. Rather have hard LG.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login