-11 Curve, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

What did you get?

Poll ended at Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:19 am

180-178
10
7%
177-175
15
11%
174-172
18
13%
171-169
21
15%
168-166
23
17%
165-160
27
20%
159-155
13
9%
154-150
7
5%
<150
4
3%
 
Total votes: 138

Lxwind

New
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:30 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Lxwind » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:47 pm

wmbuff wrote:
sev wrote:
Lxwind wrote:Was there ever a -9 before June?

Looks like a few times:
https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/co ... rgeted.cfm


Damn, there's even been a couple -8's.


So -8 is actually a real possibility???? WTF :shock:

Barry grandpapy

Bronze
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Barry grandpapy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:50 pm

Lxwind wrote:
notharveyspecter wrote:
Lalalsat96 wrote:Rc was so hard! I actually just skimmed the last passahe and guessed answers for the last 5. Thank God for the easy LG. I FINISHED WITH EXTRA TIMEand that barely happens.

Wait so i had 3 LR sections. One was 25 and two were 26. Is there any chance the experimental was the 25 question one?


I only had 2 LR sections, and I think I had two 26s (see earlier post about questioning two 26 sections vs. transfer error) and I saw someone else post they had two 26 sections too. So, I'm saying there's a chance


I had 3 LRs, with 25,25,26 questions, and I'm sure about that...


I hope we can solve this tonight

saf18hornet

Bronze
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby saf18hornet » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:51 pm

merdblah wrote:
creed wrote:we need a good thread nickname like June had


"Honestly judging if I need to cancel"


Is that honestly really necessary? Are you just concerned of the implications of your decision on others in the future?

User avatar
dm1683

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby dm1683 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:57 pm

Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight? :D

Barry grandpapy

Bronze
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Barry grandpapy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:57 pm

Was "investment in science and a healthy economy" real or experimental? I can solve the LR(25) LG LR( 25) LR(26) RC combo if someone knows

Am I allowed to say what number this was?

merdblah

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:53 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby merdblah » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:58 pm

saf18hornet wrote:
merdblah wrote:
creed wrote:we need a good thread nickname like June had


"Honestly judging if I need to cancel"


Is that honestly really necessary? Are you just concerned of the implications of your decision on others in the future?


Should probably perform some calculations and see how it weighs out.

Barry grandpapy

Bronze
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Barry grandpapy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:59 pm

dm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight? :D


About this drunk

[+] Spoiler

ddavise

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 2:46 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby ddavise » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:00 pm

:cry: :cry: :cry:
CottonHarvest wrote:
Walliums wrote:Who feels personally victimized by the judges passage?

100

greenmusic97

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:41 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby greenmusic97 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:01 pm

Barry grandpapy wrote:Was "investment in science and a healthy economy" real or experimental? I can solve the LR(25) LG LR( 25) LR(26) RC combo if someone knows

Am I allowed to say what number this was?


Idk the answer, but i think you can say the number.

User avatar
dm1683

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby dm1683 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:07 pm

Barry grandpapy wrote:
dm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight? :D


About this drunk

[+] Spoiler

I wish I could join you all in spirit but I'm resting my liver for the packer game tomorrow night.

mxhenry

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby mxhenry » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:09 pm

Who's in Brooklyn??? I need to vent :twisted:

Lalalsat96

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Lalalsat96 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:17 pm

For those with LR(25) LG LR(26) LR (26) RC like me its its probably LR 25 (my section 1) and 26 (section 4) or at least im hoping bc i skipped a question on section 3 and usually i have a minute or two to spare in LR but section 3 was pretty hard so hoping it was my experimental.

User avatar
creed

Bronze
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby creed » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:25 pm

Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?

I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.

Lxwind

New
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:30 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Lxwind » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:27 pm

creed wrote:Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?

I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.


It was easy for me as well..took me about 6~7 minutes though

merdblah

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:53 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby merdblah » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:34 pm

Lxwind wrote:
creed wrote:Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?

I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.


It was easy for me as well..took me about 6~7 minutes though


I feel like it would have been easy if I didn't waste so much time on judges. Had to skim and rush the questions. Should have done that one first.

User avatar
Walliums

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Walliums » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:35 pm

I just need to have done better than June, but oh god that doesn't feel feasible right now. Fucking judges, man

User avatar
abujabal

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby abujabal » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:38 pm

What a roller coaster of a test.

Walked out of it feeling great after that cake LG and managing to make it through judges etc, but now y'all got me stressed. 3 LRs though, which of course is my worst possible experimental outcome.

I don't know that I'd want to do a retake, barring a disaster of a score - that was an obnoxious process. Not sure how confident I feel about the test anymore, but that thing just DRAINS the hell out of you

person123456

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby person123456 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:50 pm

I had LG - LR - LG - RC - LR


Are we sure that the first LG was experimental?
I can't really remember the topics but I can remember some details of how the games were set up.

User avatar
abujabal

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby abujabal » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:52 pm

Barry grandpapy wrote:.


We doing a title pun or nah?

Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system

User avatar
Impressionist

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Impressionist » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:54 pm

greenmusic97 wrote:My take: two test forms today with that order, one with exp 1 and the other with exp 3. Check topics here: forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic…

Guys... From Jon Denning (powerscore)

So if your order was LR, LG, LR, LR, RC, some people's LR exp was 1, some 3. This is a first and I'm so annoyed. I don't think we're ever gonna figure this out. I'm gonna be in pain until scores are released.


Well i guess this is good news overall. Means there is a chance the 2nd LR I did and which I felt was easiest might be real and the one I struggled most with (section 1) may be an experimental. Could be a huge point difference for me depending on the outcome.

Barry grandpapy

Bronze
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby Barry grandpapy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:58 pm

abujabal wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:.


We doing a title pun or nah?

Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system


Let's do it. 1st four suggestions get on the poll

greenmusic97

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:41 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby greenmusic97 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:59 pm

The first q was flaw about drinking on campus. Can anyone confirm if it was real or not? Bc if so, i have figured out the exp.

User avatar
abujabal

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby abujabal » Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:02 pm

Barry grandpapy wrote:
abujabal wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:.


We doing a title pun or nah?

Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system


Let's do it. 1st four suggestions get on the poll


"Divebombing the Judges Passage"

or some variation thereof

User avatar
creed

Bronze
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby creed » Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:04 pm

Title idea: unified theory of gazpacho

User avatar
jjdude14

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:24 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Postby jjdude14 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:06 pm

dm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight? :D

I walked out of the testing center and my friend greeted me with a rum and coke. Haven't stopped since.



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests