Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
laker

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:52 am

Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby laker » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:52 pm

Hey there, could anyone give me an explanation for the difference between sufficient assumptions and necessary assumptions? I seem to be getting these mixed up pretty frequently.

Thanks!

User avatar
Platopus

Silver
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm

Re: Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby Platopus » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:59 pm

.
Last edited by Platopus on Sun Dec 17, 2017 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
laker

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 5:52 am

Re: Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby laker » Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:08 pm

I'm working through the LSAT Trainer right now and I just got to the chapter on sufficient/necessary assumptions. I definitely understand conditional logic, I'm just a little confused on applying it to the assumptions.

My understanding of it:

A sufficient assumption asks you to find an answer choice that, if assumed, would be sufficient to bring about the conclusion.. so Answer choice (true) -> conclusion (correct).

A necessary assumption asks you to find an answer choice that needs to be assumed in order for the argument to work.. so Argument (valid) -> answer choice (true).

Is my understanding correct? Thanks

mmart207

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:40 pm

Re: Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby mmart207 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:13 pm

laker wrote:I'm working through the LSAT Trainer right now and I just got to the chapter on sufficient/necessary assumptions. I definitely understand conditional logic, I'm just a little confused on applying it to the assumptions.

My understanding of it:

A sufficient assumption asks you to find an answer choice that, if assumed, would be sufficient to bring about the conclusion.. so Answer choice (true) -> conclusion (correct).

A necessary assumption asks you to find an answer choice that needs to be assumed in order for the argument to work.. so Argument (valid) -> answer choice (true).

Is my understanding correct? Thanks


Think of it as Necessary assumptions giving you half of the arrow that leads to the conclusion being properly drawn, while sufficient assumptions provide you with the entire arrow.

RSolano

Bronze
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby RSolano » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:51 am

Sufficient completely bridges the gap or hole in the argument allowing the conclusion to be fully drawn. Pretty easy to predict or pre phrase

Necessary conditions are just anything that has to be assumed for the argument to be valid. If you negate the correct answer for one of these questions it will destroy the argument completely. They're hard to predict or pre phrase because there are so many possibilities down to really obvious stuff.

mmart207

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:40 pm

Re: Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby mmart207 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:52 pm

RSolano wrote:Sufficient completely bridges the gap or hole in the argument allowing the conclusion to be fully drawn. Pretty easy to predict or pre phrase

Necessary conditions are just anything that has to be assumed for the argument to be valid. If you negate the correct answer for one of these questions it will destroy the argument completely. They're hard to predict or pre phrase because there are so many possibilities down to really obvious stuff.


I wouldn't say they're hard to predict at all. I find myself predicting the correct answer before I even look at the choices.

RSolano

Bronze
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Difference between Sufficient Assumptions and Necessary Assumptions

Postby RSolano » Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:09 am

mmart207 wrote:
RSolano wrote:Sufficient completely bridges the gap or hole in the argument allowing the conclusion to be fully drawn. Pretty easy to predict or pre phrase

Necessary conditions are just anything that has to be assumed for the argument to be valid. If you negate the correct answer for one of these questions it will destroy the argument completely. They're hard to predict or pre phrase because there are so many possibilities down to really obvious stuff.


I wouldn't say they're hard to predict at all. I find myself predicting the correct answer before I even look at the choices.


True I guess I should say don't go in with a rigid fixed expectation because sometimes a much broader unexpected right answer can get accidentally eliminated that way.



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 14 guests