June 2017 Waiters Thread- Grayday! -9 curve. GL all

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

What did you get? (Presumptive release day poll. Revolting enabled)

177+
7
5%
175+
6
4%
173+
21
15%
170+
25
18%
167+
27
19%
165+
16
11%
163+
14
10%
160+
8
6%
159 -
16
11%
 
Total votes: 140

User avatar
augustyyy

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:36 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby augustyyy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:57 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
Jack_Kelly

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Jack_Kelly » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:58 pm

Stupid question: When people say -9 curve is that -9 to 170??

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mint-Berry_Crunch » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:58 pm

Do not discuss specific answers to Qs

mod edit: THANK YOU

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Slippin' Jimmy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:59 pm

Future Ex-Engineer wrote:Easiest LG section ever.
RC was difficult but not impossible.
26Q LR section was pretty normal.
25Q LR section was quite difficult (assuming the section with heavy isotopes was real)

Yep heavy isotopes was real, and a real pain in the ass. Think I got that one right but after soooo much time.

BOSStongrl

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:18 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby BOSStongrl » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:00 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
dm1683

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby dm1683 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:00 pm

Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.

LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal

LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.

Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT

Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.

Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.

User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Future Ex-Engineer » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:01 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Future Ex-Engineer » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:02 pm

dm1683 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.

LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal

LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.

Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT

Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.

Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.


Had marsh building, but no anti-theft.
Heavy isotopes got me

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Slippin' Jimmy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:03 pm

dm1683 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.

LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal

LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.

Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT

Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.

Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.


Don't remember either one, but I don't remember any of my first LR besides it was easy. Wasn't from the mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
dm1683

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby dm1683 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:03 pm

Future Ex-Engineer wrote:
dm1683 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.

LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal

LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.

Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT

Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.

Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.


Had marsh building, but no anti-theft.
Heavy isotopes got me

YES!!! Eff that damn question. Thats the only one I really felt uneasy about. Was probably the experimental section.
Jack_Kelly wrote:Stupid question: When people say -9 curve is that -9 to 170??

Yep. Although after reconsidering I doubt it will actually be that low. Probably -10/11.
Last edited by dm1683 on Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Slippin' Jimmy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:04 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
jsr739

New
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:29 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby jsr739 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:04 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

saf18hornet

Bronze
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby saf18hornet » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:05 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
34iplaw

Gold
Posts: 3379
Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby 34iplaw » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:11 pm

Well - ya'll are done.

Congrats, yo.

GREY DAY BETTING TIME AND SPECULATION COMMENCE!

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Slippin' Jimmy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:14 pm

dm1683 wrote:
Future Ex-Engineer wrote:
dm1683 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.

LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal

LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.

Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT

Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.

Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.


Had marsh building, but no anti-theft.
Heavy isotopes got me

YES!!! Eff that damn question. Thats the only one I really felt uneasy about. Was probably the experimental section.
Jack_Kelly wrote:Stupid question: When people say -9 curve is that -9 to 170??

Yep. Although after reconsidering I doubt it will actually be that low. Probably -10/11.


My money is on -11. Sure the LG was easy but RC seems to have given people major trouble, and that second LR was definitely one of the harder ones I've seen IMHO.

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mint-Berry_Crunch » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:14 pm

I'm gunna get nailed on this test bc of the curve

Ntp73821

Silver
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:53 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Ntp73821 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:16 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
tuna_wasabi

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby tuna_wasabi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:16 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
dm1683

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby dm1683 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:18 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
tuna_wasabi

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby tuna_wasabi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:19 pm

mod edit: don't talk about a specific kind of question

User avatar
tuna_wasabi

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby tuna_wasabi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:20 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

User avatar
dm1683

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby dm1683 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:21 pm

lynn.wibi wrote:Does anyone find the comparative passage pretty hard?

Not really, but the science passage about "inferential thinking" was super tough.

User avatar
augustyyy

New
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:36 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby augustyyy » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:24 pm

mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row

roflsat

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 9:13 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby roflsat » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:27 pm

Anybody have any fun test center stories/nightmares today?

User avatar
Experiment626

Silver
Posts: 812
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Experiment626 » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:28 pm

Checking in...

RC was definitely my worst section. Got the 5 min warning with one passage left but I made sure it was the one with the least number of questions soooo hopefully I smashed all the other passages and at worst go -5.

LG- CRUSHED IT. OMG I got to the last game and was in reverse shock that it wasn't a weird one.... I had to brute force it, I think I missed a key inference that made it take longer.

LR... Not sure which is experimental but they weren't too bad. Although flying through isotopes with 1.5 minutes left was not fun...



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests