The Official September 2017 Study Group

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

Are you ready for tomorrow?!?!?!

FUCK YES
20
43%
Yeah, kind of
8
17%
Ehh, hoping for the best
7
15%
Not prepared but screw it
3
6%
HAHAHA I'M NOT EVEN TAKING THE LSAT, SUCKS FOR YOU GUYS
9
19%
 
Total votes: 47

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 1:20 pm

May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 1:24 pm

Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 1:28 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 1:29 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 1:31 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

You would go down in TLS history.

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8047
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Mikey » Fri May 12, 2017 1:31 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

I'd lose my shit if I got a 176 lol

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 1:35 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

You would go down in TLS history.

I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.

Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8047
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Mikey » Fri May 12, 2017 1:43 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability

idk about that

CottonHarvest

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:49 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby CottonHarvest » Fri May 12, 2017 1:45 pm

I'm hoping I can get in that 175+ territory, but RC is my bane.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 1:49 pm

Mikey wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability

idk about that

Have faith younglings and believe... Also pray to Stanny

LittUpGDown

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 3:34 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby LittUpGDown » Fri May 12, 2017 1:50 pm

Weird question, I'm digging into prep and I went to view my "Answer Sheet" or at least a breakdown of my scores on the LSAC website, but I can't view anything. The "Answer Sheet" icon is greyed out, and the Item Response Report doesn't show any of my responses.
What gives?
Edit: Checked the original email, realised I took the nondisclosed test essentially as a "cold" test.
Worst decision I've made in a while.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 2:00 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

You would go down in TLS history.

I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.

Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability

I wouldn't fault you for it. I was gonna retake a 174 for the same reason.
Praise Stanny.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 2:01 pm

LittUpGDown wrote:Weird question, I'm digging into prep and I went to view my "Answer Sheet" or at least a breakdown of my scores on the LSAC website, but I can't view anything. The "Answer Sheet" icon is greyed out, and the Item Response Report doesn't show any of my responses.
What gives?
Edit: Checked the original email, realised I took the nondisclosed test essentially as a "cold" test.
Worst decision I've made in a while.

Wait, did you take the real February test as a diagnostic or something?

User avatar
chewinggum

Bronze
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby chewinggum » Fri May 12, 2017 2:04 pm

.
Last edited by chewinggum on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 2:05 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.

need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

You would go down in TLS history.

I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.

Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability

I wouldn't fault you for it. I was gonna retake a 174 for the same reason.
Praise Stanny.

I'd probably quit with a 176 tbh, but below 175 is a no go for me.
Stanford is the one truth

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 2:10 pm

Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.

Anon-e-miss

Bronze
Posts: 293
Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Anon-e-miss » Fri May 12, 2017 2:13 pm

dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.

which one?
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 2:13 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.

Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.

Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?

is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?

You would go down in TLS history.

I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.

Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability

I wouldn't fault you for it. I was gonna retake a 174 for the same reason.
Praise Stanny.

I'd probably quit with a 176 tbh, but below 175 is a no go for me.
Stanford is the one truth

I honestly don't think there's a difference between 176 and 177+. You're above 75ths everywhere regardless.
There is no God, only Stanford.

User avatar
abujabal

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby abujabal » Fri May 12, 2017 2:13 pm

Y'all should I be signing up for CRS now? Or later?

And if yes, what's the TLS Recommended™ Disclosure Answers?

"Release my information to LSAC-member law schools, other programs, and/or other eligible organizations."

Y/N?

"Release my information to non-LSAC member law schools."

Y/N?

I'm leaning NN because plznospam - thoughts?
Last edited by abujabal on Fri May 12, 2017 2:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 2:13 pm

dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.

Kinda almost glad it's back to life, if we're talking about the same thread.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 2:19 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.

Kinda almost glad it's back to life, if we're talking about the same thread.

I'm not, it's the same conversation over and over. One camp distains BL and the other says it isn't that bad and you know what you signed up for. Just a going in circles thread unlike this thread.

We've got the best threads, don't we folks?

Anon-e-miss

Bronze
Posts: 293
Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Anon-e-miss » Fri May 12, 2017 2:24 pm

Alexandros wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.


I'd probably quit with a 176 tbh, but below 175 is a no go for me.
Stanford is the one truth

I honestly don't think there's a difference between 176 and 177+. You're above 75ths everywhere regardless.
There is no God, only Stanford.

I've seen people argue on this forum that a 180 is almost like a soft in itself. I'm not sure if there is any merit to that though.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dj9i27

Gold
Posts: 4367
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri May 12, 2017 2:26 pm

Anon-e-miss wrote:I've seen people argue on this forum that a 180 is almost like a soft in itself. I'm not sure if there is any merit to that though.

It is imo. 100,000 people or so take this test and ~30 get 180s. It is an impressive feat and maintains to be my goal.

btw the NYC Associate thread

User avatar
oopsu812

Silver
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby oopsu812 » Fri May 12, 2017 2:28 pm

PRAISE STANNY

That is all.

Alexandros

Platinum
Posts: 6478
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri May 12, 2017 2:28 pm

dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.

Kinda almost glad it's back to life, if we're talking about the same thread.

I'm not, it's the same conversation over and over. One camp distains BL and the other says it isn't that bad and you know what you signed up for. Just a going in circles thread unlike this thread.

We've got the best threads, don't we folks?

Very true. But I think there are some (very few but some) good convos therein about how to avoid that fate. I wouldn't know to be gunning for lit over corporate if it weren't for that thread.

My complaint about certain people's attitudes is that they're often over the top to the point that 0Ls get incredulous without providing much solid info about what makes it so bad.

We indeed have the best thread here tho.



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests