The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
You would go down in TLS history.dj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'd lose my shit if I got a 176 loldj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.Alexandros wrote:You would go down in TLS history.dj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
idk about thatdj9i27 wrote:
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:49 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'm hoping I can get in that 175+ territory, but RC is my bane.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Have faith younglings and believe... Also pray to StannyMikey wrote:idk about thatdj9i27 wrote:
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 3:34 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Weird question, I'm digging into prep and I went to view my "Answer Sheet" or at least a breakdown of my scores on the LSAC website, but I can't view anything. The "Answer Sheet" icon is greyed out, and the Item Response Report doesn't show any of my responses.
What gives?
Edit: Checked the original email, realised I took the nondisclosed test essentially as a "cold" test.
Worst decision I've made in a while.
What gives?
Edit: Checked the original email, realised I took the nondisclosed test essentially as a "cold" test.
Worst decision I've made in a while.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I wouldn't fault you for it. I was gonna retake a 174 for the same reason.dj9i27 wrote:I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.Alexandros wrote:You would go down in TLS history.dj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability
Praise Stanny.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Wait, did you take the real February test as a diagnostic or something?LittUpGDown wrote:Weird question, I'm digging into prep and I went to view my "Answer Sheet" or at least a breakdown of my scores on the LSAC website, but I can't view anything. The "Answer Sheet" icon is greyed out, and the Item Response Report doesn't show any of my responses.
What gives?
Edit: Checked the original email, realised I took the nondisclosed test essentially as a "cold" test.
Worst decision I've made in a while.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by chewinggum on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'd probably quit with a 176 tbh, but below 175 is a no go for me.Alexandros wrote:I wouldn't fault you for it. I was gonna retake a 174 for the same reason.dj9i27 wrote:I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.Alexandros wrote:You would go down in TLS history.dj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote:need 1 more to delay a retake.Alexandros wrote:May these next four page numbers be all of your LSAT scores.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability
Praise Stanny.
Stanford is the one truth
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
which one?dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I honestly don't think there's a difference between 176 and 177+. You're above 75ths everywhere regardless.dj9i27 wrote:I'd probably quit with a 176 tbh, but below 175 is a no go for me.Alexandros wrote:I wouldn't fault you for it. I was gonna retake a 174 for the same reason.dj9i27 wrote:I think a 177+ is the only way I avoid being debt fucked tho.Alexandros wrote:You would go down in TLS history.dj9i27 wrote:is it bad if I say I would heavily think about it?Alexandros wrote:Not you, son. Your score will be precisely four pages after this.dj9i27 wrote: need 1 more to delay a retake.
Real talk tho, you'd retake a 176?
Mikey you know you're above 175 territory capability
Praise Stanny.
Stanford is the one truth
There is no God, only Stanford.
- abujabal
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Y'all should I be signing up for CRS now? Or later?
And if yes, what's the TLS Recommended™ Disclosure Answers?
"Release my information to LSAC-member law schools, other programs, and/or other eligible organizations."
Y/N?
"Release my information to non-LSAC member law schools."
Y/N?
I'm leaning NN because plznospam - thoughts?
And if yes, what's the TLS Recommended™ Disclosure Answers?
"Release my information to LSAC-member law schools, other programs, and/or other eligible organizations."
Y/N?
"Release my information to non-LSAC member law schools."
Y/N?
I'm leaning NN because plznospam - thoughts?
Last edited by abujabal on Fri May 12, 2017 2:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Kinda almost glad it's back to life, if we're talking about the same thread.dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'm not, it's the same conversation over and over. One camp distains BL and the other says it isn't that bad and you know what you signed up for. Just a going in circles thread unlike this thread.Alexandros wrote:Kinda almost glad it's back to life, if we're talking about the same thread.dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.
We've got the best threads, don't we folks?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2017 8:05 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I've seen people argue on this forum that a 180 is almost like a soft in itself. I'm not sure if there is any merit to that though.Alexandros wrote:Alexandros wrote:dj9i27 wrote:Alexandros wrote:dj9i27 wrote:I honestly don't think there's a difference between 176 and 177+. You're above 75ths everywhere regardless.Alexandros wrote:I'd probably quit with a 176 tbh, but below 175 is a no go for me.dj9i27 wrote: need 1 more to delay a retake.
Stanford is the one truth
There is no God, only Stanford.
Last edited by Anon-e-miss on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
It is imo. 100,000 people or so take this test and ~30 get 180s. It is an impressive feat and maintains to be my goal.Anon-e-miss wrote: I've seen people argue on this forum that a 180 is almost like a soft in itself. I'm not sure if there is any merit to that though.
btw the NYC Associate thread
- oopsu812
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
PRAISE STANNY
That is all.
That is all.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Very true. But I think there are some (very few but some) good convos therein about how to avoid that fate. I wouldn't know to be gunning for lit over corporate if it weren't for that thread.dj9i27 wrote:I'm not, it's the same conversation over and over. One camp distains BL and the other says it isn't that bad and you know what you signed up for. Just a going in circles thread unlike this thread.Alexandros wrote:Kinda almost glad it's back to life, if we're talking about the same thread.dj9i27 wrote:Another thread that shall not be named thread is catching steam.
We've got the best threads, don't we folks?
My complaint about certain people's attitudes is that they're often over the top to the point that 0Ls get incredulous without providing much solid info about what makes it so bad.
We indeed have the best thread here tho.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login