The Official September 2017 Study Group

Your favorite type of alcohol?

Beer
13
17%
Vodka
6
8%
Rum
3
4%
Gin
3
4%
Whisky
11
14%
Wine
15
19%
Tequila
3
4%
All of the above
6
8%
Other
0
No votes
Water! You degenerates!
18
23%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
PrezRand
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby PrezRand » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:25 pm

Percocet, Molly percocet

User avatar
dj9i27
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:48 pm

Got the digital back and took the day off. Did pretty good on everything but RC so I just read the trainer outside to refresh my brain and memory.

User avatar
littlewing67
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby littlewing67 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:55 am

Platopus wrote:
littlewing67 wrote:Drilling weakness questions, and just did question 8, section 4, from PT 4. I couldn't concentrate because it made me laugh in my head thinking of a certain someone :twisted:

Also LSAC sent me an email rg. my digital lsat score. Anyone else receive theirs? I'm trying to decipher it because they included the experimental section as part of the score.

Edit: I surprisingly got less RC wrong on this than the real thing, and there were 2 sections of RC they counted................... :|


Yeah, besides totally screwing us by wasting a PT giving us 74RC as the experimental, they don't even have the decency to actually break it up so we can figure out how many we missed on each section...

I went through and reanswered all the questions immediately after the Digital test, so I know how many I actually missed, but still. Not cool LSAC.


Yeah the questions weren't new right? I assumed it would be never released questions. But I they were new material for me because I hadn't done those PTs yet.

User avatar
oopsu812
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby oopsu812 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 5:39 am

PrezRand wrote:Percocet, Molly percocet

Songs like that, Panda, and the rain drop one are just memes right?

User avatar
littlewing67
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby littlewing67 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:44 pm

Didn't sleep well and couldn't concentrate on RC so I'm leaving the library early. Bleh. That's what I get for staying up too late on /r/askreddit.

lurksoh4rd
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:55 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby lurksoh4rd » Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:41 pm

Those of you that have gained access to pdfs of PTs...how? Plz help a homegirl out :,(

User avatar
dj9i27
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:16 pm

someone captured my JS1

User avatar
Alexandros
Posts: 6460
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:37 pm

.
Last edited by Alexandros on Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dj9i27
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:49 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:someone captured my JS1

Same.

H: Why should we accept you?
>I'M ALREADY IN
H: ...
>I'M IN ON LOVE

User avatar
Alexandros
Posts: 6460
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:16 pm

.
Last edited by Alexandros on Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dj9i27
Posts: 4366
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby dj9i27 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:18 pm

Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
dj9i27 wrote:someone captured my JS1

Same.

H: Why should we accept you?
>I'M ALREADY IN
H: ...
>I'M IN ON LOVE

I got real tears from watching that video.

he's a cheap lab coat away from looking like a freshman me in lab.

ngogirl12
Posts: 801
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby ngogirl12 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:37 pm

clueless801 wrote:I actually really love the Trainer RC. I think it hit home that when you have a very limited amount of time, you need to focus on structure and author reasoning. You need to constantly question what role each part of the passage plays. I think we're so focused on trying to understand what the passages are trying to say, we forget that that it doesn't really matter that much at all once you get to the questions. I did two RCs back to back right now, and I tried to make myself understand the structure. As a result, I went through the passages much more quickly than I have in the past. The questions I got wrong were really stupid mistakes that would've been avoided with more careful reading. It's definitely work, but you guys got this!!


Thanks for this! Actually, reading my Trainer chapter and doing the drills was the highlight of my day yesterday :) I've dedicated this week to doing Trainer RC, and I'll probably finish the last section of RC Trainer in two weeks. So far, it's been life changing and incredibly helpful, so I think I am going to just stick to Trainer and forgo the Manhattan RC Guide!

I think also I am going to try and do RC sections from the 40s and 50s that I'm not hitting in my PTs, maybe 60s too. So something like doing a section from a PT of one of those tests/drilling it/BRing it.

User avatar
chewinggum
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby chewinggum » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:56 pm

ngogirl12 wrote:I think also I am going to try and do RC sections from the 40s and 50s that I'm not hitting in my PTs, maybe 60s too. So something like doing a section from a PT of one of those tests/drilling it/BRing it.

I think I might do this too. Older test make me a little nervous (a lot of the drills in PS are really old).

I just bought the Trainer and am waiting for it to come in so hopefully I have the same progress as you :D
Last edited by chewinggum on Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chewinggum
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby chewinggum » Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:15 pm

Any suggestions on what helped the most with LR? I'm currently using PS (which really helped with LG) but LR could still improve!

I'm struggling with formal logic in particular :roll:

I tried to see if there's anything on this thread but everyone's deleting their posts lol

User avatar
Mikey
Posts: 6727
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Mikey » Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:52 pm

chewinggum wrote:Any suggestions on what helped the most with LR? I'm currently using PS (which really helped with LG) but LR could still improve!

I'm struggling with formal logic in particular :roll:

I tried to see if there's anything on this thread but everyone's deleting their posts lol

What helped me most with LR was drilling by question type. But what helped once that didn't anymore was just doing sections tbh.

Formal logic isn't that bad tbh, it's pretty simple once you do it a few times. I can do like a brief LR formal logic guide type of thing for you if u want and PM it to you.

User avatar
chewinggum
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby chewinggum » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:07 pm

Mikey wrote:
chewinggum wrote:Any suggestions on what helped the most with LR? I'm currently using PS (which really helped with LG) but LR could still improve!

I'm struggling with formal logic in particular :roll:

I tried to see if there's anything on this thread but everyone's deleting their posts lol

What helped me most with LR was drilling by question type. But what helped once that didn't anymore was just doing sections tbh.

Formal logic isn't that bad tbh, it's pretty simple once you do it a few times. I can do like a brief LR formal logic guide type of thing for you if u want and PM it to you.

That would be great! Thank you!

User avatar
Impressionist
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Impressionist » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:15 pm

Taking off work to do 8 straight hours in the library of pure LG.
Oh, what a day! What a lovely day!

ngogirl12
Posts: 801
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby ngogirl12 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:24 pm

So I did a 360 degree flip, I was drilling MBT questions when I had this mini panic attack and realized that material from 1-38 is waay too old to be beneficial, plus I've already used all of the material once. SO, I switched to the 40s for drilling.

Do you guys think 40s LR is too old to be helpful for drilling? I'm planning on doing half of the 50s, most of the 60s, and 70s as PT and drilling material..

Thoughts?

User avatar
Barry grandpapy
Posts: 188
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Barry grandpapy » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:55 pm

ngogirl12 wrote:So I did a 360 degree flip, I was drilling MBT questions when I had this mini panic attack and realized that material from 1-38 is waay too old to be beneficial, plus I've already used all of the material once. SO, I switched to the 40s for drilling.

Do you guys think 40s LR is too old to be helpful for drilling? I'm planning on doing half of the 50s, most of the 60s, and 70s as PT and drilling material..

Thoughts?


I don't believe old material is too old to be beneficial. My entire LG strategy after finishing a few study books comes from drilling the hell out of 1-35. Apart from small changes like the two author passages in RC, the LR question minimum being raised from 24 to 25, and the one LR stimulus having two separate questions being removed, the old material seems just as relevant to me as anything from 50+

Also, the old games are possibly more relevant than ever since some of them were more odd and quite a few of the PTs above the 70s follow that trend.

Edit-my fat thumb hit an emoji

User avatar
Alexandros
Posts: 6460
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Alexandros » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:57 pm

.
Last edited by Alexandros on Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ngogirl12
Posts: 801
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby ngogirl12 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:48 pm

Alexandros wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:
ngogirl12 wrote:So I did a 360 degree flip, I was drilling MBT questions when I had this mini panic attack and realized that material from 1-38 is waay too old to be beneficial, plus I've already used all of the material once. SO, I switched to the 40s for drilling.

Do you guys think 40s LR is too old to be helpful for drilling? I'm planning on doing half of the 50s, most of the 60s, and 70s as PT and drilling material..

Thoughts?


I don't believe old material is too old to be beneficial. My entire LG strategy after finishing a few study books comes from drilling the hell out of 1-35. Apart from small changes like the two author passages in RC, the LR question minimum being raised from 24 to 25, and the one LR stimulus having two separate questions being removed, the old material seems just as relevant to me as anything from 50+

Also, the old games are possibly more relevant than ever since some of them were more odd and quite a few of the PTs above the 70s follow that trend.

Edit-my fat thumb hit an emoji

Agree with this.


Thank you both for your responses!

I'm actually finding the 40s (currently drilling MBT) to be very easy compared to material from 1-38. If you were going to go with one over the other re: 1-38 vs 40s and first half of 50s for LR drilling material, which would you do?

Also, I plan on redrilling all LG 1-40 to keep my LG brain fresh. I've already drilled all of those games.

User avatar
HesusChrist
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 04, 2017 8:02 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby HesusChrist » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:11 pm

ngogirl12 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:
ngogirl12 wrote:So I did a 360 degree flip, I was drilling MBT questions when I had this mini panic attack and realized that material from 1-38 is waay too old to be beneficial, plus I've already used all of the material once. SO, I switched to the 40s for drilling.

Do you guys think 40s LR is too old to be helpful for drilling? I'm planning on doing half of the 50s, most of the 60s, and 70s as PT and drilling material..

Thoughts?


I don't believe old material is too old to be beneficial. My entire LG strategy after finishing a few study books comes from drilling the hell out of 1-35. Apart from small changes like the two author passages in RC, the LR question minimum being raised from 24 to 25, and the one LR stimulus having two separate questions being removed, the old material seems just as relevant to me as anything from 50+

Also, the old games are possibly more relevant than ever since some of them were more odd and quite a few of the PTs above the 70s follow that trend.

Edit-my fat thumb hit an emoji

Agree with this.


Thank you both for your responses!

I'm actually finding the 40s (currently drilling MBT) to be very easy compared to material from 1-38. If you were going to go with one over the other re: 1-38 vs 40s and first half of 50s for LR drilling material, which would you do?

Also, I plan on redrilling all LG 1-40 to keep my LG brain fresh. I've already drilled all of those games.


LR from the 40s and 50s is generally considered some of the easiest I believe.

ngogirl12
Posts: 801
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:05 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby ngogirl12 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:19 pm

HesusChrist wrote:
ngogirl12 wrote:
Alexandros wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:
ngogirl12 wrote:So I did a 360 degree flip, I was drilling MBT questions when I had this mini panic attack and realized that material from 1-38 is waay too old to be beneficial, plus I've already used all of the material once. SO, I switched to the 40s for drilling.

Do you guys think 40s LR is too old to be helpful for drilling? I'm planning on doing half of the 50s, most of the 60s, and 70s as PT and drilling material..

Thoughts?


I don't believe old material is too old to be beneficial. My entire LG strategy after finishing a few study books comes from drilling the hell out of 1-35. Apart from small changes like the two author passages in RC, the LR question minimum being raised from 24 to 25, and the one LR stimulus having two separate questions being removed, the old material seems just as relevant to me as anything from 50+

Also, the old games are possibly more relevant than ever since some of them were more odd and quite a few of the PTs above the 70s follow that trend.

Edit-my fat thumb hit an emoji

Agree with this.


Thank you both for your responses!

I'm actually finding the 40s (currently drilling MBT) to be very easy compared to material from 1-38. If you were going to go with one over the other re: 1-38 vs 40s and first half of 50s for LR drilling material, which would you do?

Also, I plan on redrilling all LG 1-40 to keep my LG brain fresh. I've already drilled all of those games.


LR from the 40s and 50s is generally considered some of the easiest I believe.


So you would suggest using 1-38 for LR drilling material then?

sidenote: I just whizzed through the 40s MBT lol

Hulk412
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 1:41 am

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby Hulk412 » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:04 am

Just registered for the September 2017 test and ready to finally go for it. I've always registered in the past but never actually taken the test. After working in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the past 7 months I've found a new love for the Law and am motivated and ready to give it my all!

User avatar
it's allgood
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:04 pm

Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group

Postby it's allgood » Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:30 pm

chewinggum wrote:Any suggestions on what helped the most with LR? I'm currently using PS (which really helped with LG) but LR could still improve!

I'm struggling with formal logic in particular :roll:

I tried to see if there's anything on this thread but everyone's deleting their posts lol


For Formal Logic, I found Powerscore's chapters on logic from the LR Bible to very helpful--I think one of them was chapter 13. I went over the two chapters several times. Also, taking PTs and typing up answers to all missed LR questions and reviewing them was very helpful. Reading the question first helped me with accuracy also.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: coskigirl, Future Ex-Engineer, heyduchess, jagerbom79, mwells56, Platopus, Purptort, Walliums, WutSheOrder and 20 guests