34iplaw wrote: em15 wrote:
34iplaw wrote: cherrygalore wrote:
34iplaw wrote:Is it bad that I now want to take PT48 to compare? I'm not sure whether I have.
Bad. Nothing good can come out of that.
Haha... does anyone have a list of all the 170 curves? I dunno... I feel like I'd be much more comfortable if I heard from those that generally PT in the 163-168 range about how they felt.
I was PTing in that range. Never took PT48
If you don't mind me asking, how did you feel about the RC and LG?
LG was always my best, and I'm pretty sure I got the big inferences. I felt like some RC Q's were way too easy to be real, but then there were still some that I seriously debated between two answers. RC is usually my worst (I tend to miss 9 or 10 questions every time whether I finished or didn't or felt good or didn't, so I'm worried how I did even though it felt pretty good). I thought LR had a weird distribution of Q types but was pretty average in difficulty