MediocreAtBest wrote:Took a PT today, really wasn't feeling it.
LR1: -3 after changing a correct ac to a wrong ac
RC: -3 because I feel like they were kinda BS questions/answer choices
LR2: -6 lol I was just ready to get it over with.
Score is a 170, 179 on BR. Realistically should've been like a 173, and I'll enjoy my last day being able to make excuses and saying what it "should've been." I feel ok about monday, I'm guessing I'll be between 172-174, was really hoping for 175+ but that shit is hard.
Same here. I really want to hit my PT average but I've been stuck around 171 in the late 70s. Guessing I will be around there on test day. I look at some of my high scores (two 177s and a 179) and think "how tf did I do that?"
Platopus wrote:dm1683 wrote:Platopus wrote:Slippin' Jimmy wrote:dm1683 wrote:You guys think we'll see another harsh curve? -10?
I really don't think so. The trend has been towards having one or both of hard LG/RC with average LR. I don't think they could possibly justify a -10 if this holds. I'm feeling -12 on Monday.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see a "harder" test with a -12 or -13 point curve. Last couple tests (barring February, of course), have been -10/-11 curves.
For some reason I feel like RC is going to be insane. Like pin factory insane. LG will be three easy games and one weirdo. LR will be standard.
Pretty sure I went -0 on the entire RC section, so that's okay with me
oh screw you plato