nimbus cloud wrote:I sucked at games initially then PT'ed -1 average and ended up going -6 (out of total -8) on the actual test. So 75% of the missed questions came trom LG.
Easiest to improve on for sure, but I hear people say you're guaranteed -0/-1 on LG if you are good at LSAT, and that was clearly not the case for me.
I don't think it's necessarily the case anymore. These weird games are harder to study for and missing inferences is usually more painful than it is on standard games. I think people really need to try to be flexible in how they approach games.