Top Law Schools

YANGQI77 wrote:I had LG LR RC LG LR. I think the games are fine, but the the last two articles in reading is pretty hard. I don't have time to finish the bee article, and picked C for the last three questions.. Hope that I at least get one correct...

Were both of your LR sections 26 questions.

I don't remember the numbers..
I remember one questions about a survey in politician election.

wait, the 1-6, 7-12 was a don't say type game? What? How?g

<3

Both LRs were 26 questions

How in the fuck was 1-6/ 7-12 in ANY way a dont say type game?! now im tripping

.

Feeling really really good about how today went! I finished all 5 sections before the 5 minute warning was called so I had plenty of time.to go back and circle answers. I personally thought the 1-6, 7-12 game was really easy so I hope I didn't miss something

Overall, I am optimistic that I improved my score since June!

I have 3 LR. don't know which is experimental. DOes any one have the LR section with the question of "drinking coffee for # and # years".

.

66hahaha wrote:I have 3 LR. don't know which is experimental. DOes any one have the LR section with the question of "drinking coffee for 5 and 10 years and they have different impact on health". This is like the first qustion in my first LR.

that was not experimental. But posting that much might be against LSAT rules, so I'd advise editing your post

That f*%king mystery novel question. And for some reason the SAD question. I read the SAD question 5 times. Finished the section. Read it 5 times again. I don't know what I was missing. It came so early in the section that it must have been easier than I was making it out to be

*Please let me know if this violates LSAC guidelines. As far as I can remember people last June were referring to specific LR questions without going into detail

I thought I had submitted this post, but I guess not (or it got deleted).

I felt really good about this test. So, I either did great (at/above target) or horribly aka they got me on traps.

I had an experimental LG section. My test order was: LG, LR, RC, LG, LR.

One LG section seemed a lot easier than other. There was one passage on RC where I started to glaze over (a comparative reading passage). LR-nothing stood out to me.

I had no issues with time. I finished my first LG section right when they called 5mins. The rest of the sections, I had at least 2-3 mins to spare.

chargers21 wrote:

66hahaha wrote:I have 3 LR. don't know which is experimental. DOes any one have the LR section with the question of "drinking coffee for 5 and 10 years and they have different impact on health". This is like the first qustion in my first LR.

that was not experimental. But posting that much might be against LSAT rules, so I'd advise editing your post

I've edited it. Thanks for letting me know~

Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

I took september. The logic game section in september was easy compared to this one in my book

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

is that smaller or larger than normal?

chargers21 wrote:

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

I took september. The logic game section in september was easy compared to this one in my book

Wow I feel completely differently. Panicked on September big time and had to guess on at least three or four, thought this one was very manageable.

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

Can't imagine it being 13. I pray to the heavens it is, but I don't think so. Then again, I don't know what's typical of 102 question exams.

Susurrus wrote:

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

Can't imagine it being 13. I pray to the heavens it is, but I don't think so. Then again, I don't know what's typical of 102 question exams.

I did some investigating. Looks like you have to go back to PT 62 for a 102 question test. Was a -13 curve, but it had a fairly difficult RC and LG.

kryptik wrote:

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

is that smaller or larger than normal?

-12 to me would indicate the test is a bit more difficult than average but it's hard to say since this test had an "extra" question. Imo both LR sections had a few difficult questions but nothing out of the ordinary.

nope

LegallyBlackJD wrote:LR, RC, LR, LR, LG

I found one of the passages in RC to be a bit on the difficult side.
LG was pretty straightforward, except circle game got to me a bit. I always go -0 (lowest)/-2(highest) on LG. I definitely got more than 2 wrong.
I thought LR was fine.

Which one was experimental? do you know?

AJordan wrote:Went: RC/LR/RC/LR/LG. My first RC section seemed to be pulled together from (per 7sage) a 3star, a 4star, and two 5stars. I felt it was hard af and I admittedly struggled, especially in the comparative reading passage. When I turned to section 3 and saw RC again I let out a massive sigh of relief. It was much more along the lines of easy, medium, medium, hard imo and felt more naturally like the RC sections in the previous 80+ exams I've taken.

Though now I'm kind of halfway hoping that the first one was the real one because that means everyone else was just as fucked.

The real section had a passage about bees (actually, the waggle dance made an appearance on a preptest from a few years ago, but in a comparative preptest.)
I had RC/LR/RC/LG/LR
My experimental's hard passage was about plate tectonics. The first passage was something about the constitution and it seemed abnormally hard for a first passage.

Forgot to mention my experimental section was LR. My test was LR, RC, LR, LR, LG. The first LR was definitely the easiest, so I hope it wasn't experimental! haha but I really felt mostly fine about all of them.

etramak wrote:That f*%king mystery novel question. And for some reason the SAD question. I read the SAD question 5 times. Finished the section. Read it 5 times again. I don't know what I was missing. It came so early in the section that it must have been easier than I was making it out to be

*Please let me know if this violates LSAC guidelines. As far as I can remember people last June were referring to specific LR questions without going into detail

I think I recognize both of those questions but can't for the life of me remember specifics or if I thought they were easy or hard Either way, even if you got those two wrong (unlikely), you probably still did AMAZINGLY on the test overall

Scores come out in approximately 3 weeks correct? There's not some special timeline (miracle) that means Feb scores come out in just one week?