February 2017 LSAT Thread

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
ACS0612

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby ACS0612 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:23 pm

YANGQI77 wrote:I had LG LR RC LG LR. I think the games are fine, but the the last two articles in reading is pretty hard. I don't have time to finish the bee article, and picked C for the last three questions.. Hope that I at least get one correct... :oops: :oops:

Were both of your LR sections 26 questions.

YANGQI77

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 3:08 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby YANGQI77 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

I don't remember the numbers..
I remember one questions about a survey in politician election.

Susurrus

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:28 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby Susurrus » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

wait, the 1-6, 7-12 was a don't say type game? What? How?g

User avatar
chasima

Bronze
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 11:03 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby chasima » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:38 pm

<3
Last edited by chasima on Wed Apr 05, 2017 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

etramak

Silver
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby etramak » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:38 pm

Both LRs were 26 questions

pandaempire212

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 2:28 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby pandaempire212 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:54 pm

How in the fuck was 1-6/ 7-12 in ANY way a dont say type game?! now im tripping

User avatar
Neil_Gorsuch

New
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:12 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby Neil_Gorsuch » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:02 pm

.
Last edited by Neil_Gorsuch on Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anon.y.mousse.

Silver
Posts: 599
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby Anon.y.mousse. » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:03 pm

Mod edit: don't talk about game type

User avatar
airwrecka

Silver
Posts: 1118
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:54 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby airwrecka » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:04 pm

Feeling really really good about how today went! I finished all 5 sections before the 5 minute warning was called so I had plenty of time.to go back and circle answers. I personally thought the 1-6, 7-12 game was really easy so I hope I didn't miss something :shock:

Overall, I am optimistic that I improved my score since June! :)

66hahaha

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:00 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby 66hahaha » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:09 pm

I have 3 LR. don't know which is experimental. DOes any one have the LR section with the question of "drinking coffee for # and # years".
Last edited by 66hahaha on Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby chargers21 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:10 pm

.
Last edited by chargers21 on Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby chargers21 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:11 pm

66hahaha wrote:I have 3 LR. don't know which is experimental. DOes any one have the LR section with the question of "drinking coffee for 5 and 10 years and they have different impact on health". This is like the first qustion in my first LR.

that was not experimental. But posting that much might be against LSAT rules, so I'd advise editing your post

etramak

Silver
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby etramak » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:18 pm

That f*%king mystery novel question. And for some reason the SAD question. I read the SAD question 5 times. Finished the section. Read it 5 times again. I don't know what I was missing. It came so early in the section that it must have been easier than I was making it out to be

*Please let me know if this violates LSAC guidelines. As far as I can remember people last June were referring to specific LR questions without going into detail
Last edited by etramak on Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

CMac86

Bronze
Posts: 158
Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby CMac86 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:20 pm

I thought I had submitted this post, but I guess not (or it got deleted).

I felt really good about this test. So, I either did great (at/above target) or horribly aka they got me on traps.

I had an experimental LG section. My test order was: LG, LR, RC, LG, LR.

One LG section seemed a lot easier than other. There was one passage on RC where I started to glaze over (a comparative reading passage). LR-nothing stood out to me.

I had no issues with time. I finished my first LG section right when they called 5mins. The rest of the sections, I had at least 2-3 mins to spare.

66hahaha

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:00 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby 66hahaha » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:21 pm

chargers21 wrote:
66hahaha wrote:I have 3 LR. don't know which is experimental. DOes any one have the LR section with the question of "drinking coffee for 5 and 10 years and they have different impact on health". This is like the first qustion in my first LR.

that was not experimental. But posting that much might be against LSAT rules, so I'd advise editing your post

I've edited it. Thanks for letting me know~

etramak

Silver
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby etramak » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:23 pm

Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

User avatar
chargers21

Gold
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby chargers21 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:27 pm

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

I took september. The logic game section in september was easy compared to this one in my book

User avatar
kryptik

Gold
Posts: 3627
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:41 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby kryptik » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:28 pm

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

is that smaller or larger than normal?

Anon.y.mousse.

Silver
Posts: 599
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby Anon.y.mousse. » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:29 pm

chargers21 wrote:
etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

I took september. The logic game section in september was easy compared to this one in my book


Wow I feel completely differently. Panicked on September big time and had to guess on at least three or four, thought this one was very manageable.

Susurrus

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:28 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby Susurrus » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:29 pm

etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...


Can't imagine it being 13. I pray to the heavens it is, but I don't think so. Then again, I don't know what's typical of 102 question exams.

etramak

Silver
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby etramak » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:34 pm

Susurrus wrote:
etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...


Can't imagine it being 13. I pray to the heavens it is, but I don't think so. Then again, I don't know what's typical of 102 question exams.


I did some investigating. Looks like you have to go back to PT 62 for a 102 question test. Was a -13 curve, but it had a fairly difficult RC and LG.

kryptik wrote:
etramak wrote:Powerscore LSAT guy predicting a -12 or -13 curve. But noone here is really freaking out like people were in Sept about lacquer...

is that smaller or larger than normal?


-12 to me would indicate the test is a bit more difficult than average but it's hard to say since this test had an "extra" question. Imo both LR sections had a few difficult questions but nothing out of the ordinary.

AJordan

Bronze
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:48 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby AJordan » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:45 pm

nope
Last edited by AJordan on Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Pmakesp

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:38 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby Pmakesp » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:49 pm

LegallyBlackJD wrote:LR, RC, LR, LR, LG

I found one of the passages in RC to be a bit on the difficult side.
LG was pretty straightforward, except circle game got to me a bit. I always go -0 (lowest)/-2(highest) on LG. I definitely got more than 2 wrong.
I thought LR was fine.



Which one was experimental? do you know?

etramak

Silver
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby etramak » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:50 pm

AJordan wrote:Went: RC/LR/RC/LR/LG. My first RC section seemed to be pulled together from (per 7sage) a 3star, a 4star, and two 5stars. I felt it was hard af and I admittedly struggled, especially in the comparative reading passage. When I turned to section 3 and saw RC again I let out a massive sigh of relief. It was much more along the lines of easy, medium, medium, hard imo and felt more naturally like the RC sections in the previous 80+ exams I've taken.

Though now I'm kind of halfway hoping that the first one was the real one because that means everyone else was just as fucked.

The real section had a passage about bees (actually, the waggle dance made an appearance on a preptest from a few years ago, but in a comparative preptest.)
I had RC/LR/RC/LG/LR
My experimental's hard passage was about plate tectonics. The first passage was something about the constitution and it seemed abnormally hard for a first passage.

User avatar
airwrecka

Silver
Posts: 1118
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:54 pm

Re: February 2017 LSAT Thread

Postby airwrecka » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:54 pm

Forgot to mention my experimental section was LR. My test was LR, RC, LR, LR, LG. The first LR was definitely the easiest, so I hope it wasn't experimental! haha but I really felt mostly fine about all of them.

etramak wrote:That f*%king mystery novel question. And for some reason the SAD question. I read the SAD question 5 times. Finished the section. Read it 5 times again. I don't know what I was missing. It came so early in the section that it must have been easier than I was making it out to be

*Please let me know if this violates LSAC guidelines. As far as I can remember people last June were referring to specific LR questions without going into detail


I think I recognize both of those questions but can't for the life of me remember specifics or if I thought they were easy or hard :P Either way, even if you got those two wrong (unlikely), you probably still did AMAZINGLY on the test overall :)

Scores come out in approximately 3 weeks correct? There's not some special timeline (miracle) that means Feb scores come out in just one week? :lol:



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 9 guests