Page 296 of 414

Post removed...

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 5:59 pm
by Mint-Berry_Crunch
Post removed...

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 5:59 pm
by BirdLawExpert
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:00 pm
by BirdLawExpert
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:00 pm
by NL2424
..

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:01 pm
by JackelJ
zacboro wrote:Okay someone slide in my DMs with a new poll idea.

list the question on one line
with each available AC on its own line. Yinz are so desperate grey is going to happen by the time I make this.
I'm a little disappointed in you, OP. I had higher hopes when you volunteered.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:01 pm
by RareExports
doublehoohopeful wrote:
BirdLawExpert wrote:I've been to forty states. I won't rank them 1-40, but I'll put them in tiers. This is good procrastination, and is based purely on my own experience.

Tier 1- At least one overwhelmingly world class city, an overwhelming degree of natural beauty, or both.

Alaska, California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, Texas, New York, Wyoming, Utah, Illinois, and North Carolina.

Tier 2- Some solid cities, at least one good university, better-than-average outdoor offerings or some good museums.

Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Louisiana, Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and Massachusetts.

Tier 3- Good and bad equal out.

Kansas, Nebraska, Arkansas, Iowa, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Alabama, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut.

Tier 4- Less than average. Not terrible but just meh.

Oklahoma.

States I haven't been to:

Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and West Virginia.
Montana is wickedly beautiful. Glacier National Park is just unreal.

You lost credibility when you put Wyoming in tier 1.

Edit: Ehh, I guess Wyoming has Yellowstone, but I wasn't a huge fan of what I saw.
Montana, Wyoming, Idaho are HYS of states

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:01 pm
by deadthrone7
zacboro wrote:LURKERS.. WE WELCOME YE TO JOIN OUR QUEST FOR 300 PAGES BEFORE 6PM



Pitching in. LSAT numero 2.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:02 pm
by BirdLawExpert
Post removed.

Post removed.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:02 pm
by buckiguy_sucks
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:02 pm
by doublehoohopeful
BirdLawExpert wrote:
doublehoohopeful wrote:
BirdLawExpert wrote:I've been to forty states. I won't rank them 1-40, but I'll put them in tiers. This is good procrastination, and is based purely on my own experience.

Tier 1- At least one overwhelmingly world class city, an overwhelming degree of natural beauty, or both.

Alaska, California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, Texas, New York, Wyoming, Utah, Illinois, and North Carolina.

Tier 2- Some solid cities, at least one good university, better-than-average outdoor offerings or some good museums.

Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Louisiana, Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and Massachusetts.

Tier 3- Good and bad equal out.

Kansas, Nebraska, Arkansas, Iowa, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Alabama, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut.

Tier 4- Less than average. Not terrible but just meh.

Oklahoma.

States I haven't been to:

Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and West Virginia.
Montana is wickedly beautiful. Glacier National Park is just unreal.

You lost credibility when you put Wyoming in tier 1.
Have you been to Wyoming? It's freaking gorgeous. Yellowstone is there. Automatic tier 1.
I edited my original post, my impression of the state is colored by the boring drive from Yellowstone to Denver.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:02 pm
by GiveMeGrayIcons
I feel like this thread has gotten so random I don't know why this thread exists anymore. Watch us completely miss the gray because we were so focused tipsy target runs, ranking of the states, legally blonde, reaching 300 pages.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:03 pm
by BirdLawExpert
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:03 pm
by JackelJ
GiveMeGrayIcons wrote:I feel like this thread has gotten so random I don't know why this thread exists anymore. Watch us completely miss the gray because we were so focused tipsy target runs, ranking of the states, legally blonde, reaching 300 pages.
LOL do you even TLS? We won't miss gray.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:03 pm
by BirdLawExpert
Post removed.

Post removed.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:04 pm
by Generally
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:04 pm
by NL2424
..

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:04 pm
by RareExports
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
RareExports wrote: Montana, Wyoming, Idaho are HYS of states
only for nature

ETA otherwise the cooley of states
Not everything can be Cincinnati

Post removed...

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:04 pm
by Mint-Berry_Crunch
Post removed...

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:05 pm
by BirdLawExpert
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:05 pm
by The Abyss
doublehoohopeful wrote:
BirdLawExpert wrote:I've been to forty states. I won't rank them 1-40, but I'll put them in tiers. This is good procrastination, and is based purely on my own experience.

Tier 1- At least one overwhelmingly world class city, an overwhelming degree of natural beauty, or both.

Alaska, California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, Texas, New York, Wyoming, Utah, Illinois, and North Carolina.

Tier 2- Some solid cities, at least one good university, better-than-average outdoor offerings or some good museums.

Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Louisiana, Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and Massachusetts.

Tier 3- Good and bad equal out.

Kansas, Nebraska, Arkansas, Iowa, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Alabama, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut.

Tier 4- Less than average. Not terrible but just meh.

Oklahoma.

States I haven't been to:

Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and West Virginia.
Montana is wickedly beautiful. Glacier National Park is just unreal.

You lost credibility when you put Wyoming in tier 1.

Edit: Ehh, I guess Wyoming has Yellowstone, but I wasn't a huge fan of what I saw.
Wyoming is incredibly beautiful. The Tetons are the most striking mountain range in the continuous 48 and the Wind Rivers are amazing as well. Even the high plains of the eastern side of the state have a certain beauty to them. I loved living there and there was never a shortage of outdoor activities. That said, western Montana is the most beautiful area of the country that I've ever visited.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:05 pm
by GiveMeGrayIcons
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:So if people's percentiles are changing for their scores, does that mean they might have re-equated?
IT MEANS TODAY IS THE GRAAAYYY

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:05 pm
by JackelJ
I don't understand how people's percentiles changed. Can someone explain why this would happen? Maybe I'm just dumb.

Post removed.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:05 pm
by buckiguy_sucks
Post removed.

Post removed.

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:06 pm
by buckiguy_sucks
Post removed.

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2015 6:06 pm
by RareExports
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:So if people's percentiles are changing for their scores, does that mean they might have re-equated?
Maybe. Or they've changed how they round percentiles.