The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1)

What now?

See you in a "personal statements" thread
35
26%
Applying this cycle, but done with TLS
6
4%
Retake in October
58
43%
Indefinite retake
10
7%
I'm gonna make a "should I retake?" thread
12
9%
Change of career choice
4
3%
Other
10
7%
 
Total votes: 135

User avatar
BasilHallward
Posts: 424
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:19 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby BasilHallward » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:45 am

I had the LR(25); RC; LR(25); LR(25); LG.

It's difficult with all those LR questions to place certain questions in the correct sections. I am hoping that the section right before break was experimental. It seemed difficult on the front end.

User avatar
TheWalkingDebt
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:04 am

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby TheWalkingDebt » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:45 am

peke wrote:Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.


I had experimental lr and I don't think I had that question

User avatar
buckiguy_sucks
Posts: 2624
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm

Post removed.

Postby buckiguy_sucks » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:45 am

Post removed.
Last edited by buckiguy_sucks on Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
RareExports
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:12 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby RareExports » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:45 am

peke wrote:Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.

I'm pretty sure I did not have that question, but I'm not exclusively confident. Initially I didn't remember having the city privatizing parking question, but it turns out that I did.

User avatar
TexasENG
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby TexasENG » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:47 am

.
Last edited by TexasENG on Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

peke
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 6:01 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby peke » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:47 am

Hm, that was in the same section as the Mate tea question which seems like many people saw. I guess the experimental section do vary questions as well?

User avatar
TheWalkingDebt
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:04 am

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby TheWalkingDebt » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:49 am

[*]
peke wrote:Hm, that was in the same section as the Mate tea question which seems like many people saw. I guess the experimental section do vary questions as well?


I had the mate question but not the conference planning one

User avatar
tedofsandimas
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 1:32 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby tedofsandimas » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:50 am

peke wrote:Hm, that was in the same section as the Mate tea question which seems like many people saw. I guess the experimental section do vary questions as well?


I had a question about Mate tea and did not have an LR experimental, but I don't remember anything about a conference.

User avatar
BasilHallward
Posts: 424
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:19 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby BasilHallward » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:55 am

TexasENG wrote:So I'm wondering, does anyone have an idea on how much data we get back on our scores? Do we get a question by question breakdown, or just a score by section? Do we get a percentile overall, by section, by question etc? --- I like numbers...



We get the the answer sheet, which includes the credited responses and your responses, question for question. You get you overall score and the corresponding percentile. We get everything, save for the experimental section data, of course.

User avatar
Whnlifegvsulmns
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:36 am

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby Whnlifegvsulmns » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:59 am

BasilHallward wrote:
TexasENG wrote:So I'm wondering, does anyone have an idea on how much data we get back on our scores? Do we get a question by question breakdown, or just a score by section? Do we get a percentile overall, by section, by question etc? --- I like numbers...



We get the the answer sheet, which includes the credited responses and your responses, question for question. You get you overall score and the corresponding percentile. We get everything, save for the experimental section data, of course.



I believe you also get the test questions for up to 6(?) months after the test that you can go through with the correct responses (if this was intended to be expressed, it wasn't clear).

User avatar
TexasENG
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby TexasENG » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:00 am

.
Last edited by TexasENG on Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RareExports
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:12 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby RareExports » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:22 am

TexasENG wrote:Awesome! Thanks for the info.

Also, can someone explain the curve to me? Is that a guess of number of missed questions to a 170?

Yes

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22835
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:26 am

JoanaP wrote:Call this question crazy but people with great memories, help..! do you remember if you circled a many D's for the game section?

For the record - yes, this question is ban worthy. The user has been banned. The reason is that it asks about specific answers.

User avatar
jumbo2016
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:11 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby jumbo2016 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:39 am

whacka wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:I remember there being a blood cell response time question I thought was really tough and I think that was in my 2nd lr section (third overall section on mine). Anyone with just two lrs have that?

Also is the above bannable? Trying to not get banned a third time.


The one with coffee and tea? If so I had that. I also thought that one was tricky until I figured it out and almost had to smack myself. It was one of those where the answer is so obvious once you realize, but the wording makes it tough.


Same with me. I chose the right answer just because it seemed right and circled it to go back and when I read the question and answers again and I was like wow DUH.

User avatar
jetsfan1
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby jetsfan1 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:46 am

Nice, seems like I'm the first TLS international taker checking in to this thread... Kind of sucks reading all your analyses and not being able to relate because my test was different though haha

Anyway, thought it went ok. Unfortunately, the games section that was real for me was the one I messed up on and I crushed the experimental. But all the other sections went smoothly I think, so we will see what happens.

Question though: Will we (international test takers) get our scores when y'all do?

User avatar
buckiguy_sucks
Posts: 2624
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm

Post removed.

Postby buckiguy_sucks » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:49 am

Post removed.
Last edited by buckiguy_sucks on Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
whacka
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:46 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby whacka » Tue Jun 09, 2015 10:53 am

.
Last edited by whacka on Thu Jul 16, 2015 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jumbo2016
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:11 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby jumbo2016 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:01 am

When does everyone think our scores will come out? Over the past 5 years it looks like scores have come out in three weeks on the dot for 3/5, 1 year they came 1 day after three weeks, and one year they came a few days before the three week mark (fingers crossed for that :mrgreen: :mrgreen: ).

waw
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:01 am

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby waw » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:05 am

tedofsandimas wrote:Black Ticonderogas are a potential sign of a fellow TLS-er, right? There was a guy in my room with those and a Staedtler eraser. I would have said something to him but my room was extremely quiet and no one was talking to anyone else at all.

My testing center was great even with the hour drive there. The proctors had clearly done this before and we were out of there at 5.


haha I had my black ticonderogas and someone told me even my pencils were intense so I was bound to score well...well lets hope! :wink:

dhb44
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby dhb44 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:10 am

TheWalkingDebt wrote:
peke wrote:Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.


I had experimental lr and I don't think I had that question



i believed i did, it was on the left page on the right side...

User avatar
buckiguy_sucks
Posts: 2624
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm

Post removed.

Postby buckiguy_sucks » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:15 am

Post removed.
Last edited by buckiguy_sucks on Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
buckiguy_sucks
Posts: 2624
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm

Post removed.

Postby buckiguy_sucks » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:29 am

Post removed.
Last edited by buckiguy_sucks on Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:29 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
NL2424
Posts: 1283
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 1:12 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby NL2424 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:40 am

..
Last edited by NL2424 on Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

amd3_3
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:54 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby amd3_3 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:45 am

zacboro wrote:
dhb44 wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:
peke wrote:Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.


I had experimental lr and I don't think I had that question



i believed i did, it was on the left page on the right side...


I believe this was experimental, because it was question 25 and then I had question 26 right next to it. I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure!



Agreed. This was section1 for me, and my format was LR (26) - RC - LR (25) - LR (25) - LG

dhb44
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread

Postby dhb44 » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:58 am

amd3_3 wrote:
zacboro wrote:
dhb44 wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:
peke wrote:Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.


I had experimental lr and I don't think I had that question



i believed i did, it was on the left page on the right side...


I believe this was experimental, because it was question 25 and then I had question 26 right next to it. I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure!



Agreed. This was section1 for me, and my format was LR (26) - RC - LR (25) - LR (25) - LG


I must not be talking about the same one because i had two LG sections. First one experimental was hard i probably did a touch better on the second games section.. the rest of the test seemed alright as well i'm hoping for a 160 i dont know tho




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BobBoblaw, dontsaywhatyoumean and 10 guests