The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:19 pm

Post removed.

Li'l Sebastian · Post by **Li'l Sebastian** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:20 pm

I NEED MY SCORE SO I CAN PLAN

DAMN YOU LSAC

TexasENG · Post by **TexasENG** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:21 pm

ruizdaw wrote:I NEED MY SCORE SO I CAN PLAN

DAMN YOU LSAC

Just count on your 180 coming through and plan accordingly.

Li'l Sebastian · Post by **Li'l Sebastian** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:24 pm

TexasENG wrote:
ruizdaw wrote:I NEED MY SCORE SO I CAN PLAN

DAMN YOU LSAC
Just count on your 180 coming through and plan accordingly.

If that's the case I'll see you guys at Yale.

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:25 pm

Post removed.

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:25 pm

Post removed.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:26 pm

Post removed.

TexasENG · Post by **TexasENG** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:28 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
ruizdaw wrote:
TexasENG wrote:
ruizdaw wrote:I NEED MY SCORE SO I CAN PLAN
DAMN YOU LSAC
Just count on your 180 coming through and plan accordingly.
If that's the case I'll see you guys at Yale.
LOL at Yale caliber UG GPAs

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:29 pm

Post removed.

TexasENG · Post by **TexasENG** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:30 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
More of a self burn. Under 3.5 CREW

I know that feel. I think once the LSAC got done taking my gpa behind the shack I'm at like a 3.48

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:31 pm

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:32 pm

Post removed.

jumbocolumbo · Post by **jumbocolumbo** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:33 pm

All of this admissions talk is really cutting into my shitposting.

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:34 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
placeholder wrote:i consider texas and ucla t16 not bc of the money but more the stability in getting big law. i used t16 in the context of seamus saying you need to be top percentage to get big law, and i said you do not if you are going to these 16 law schools because consistently around 35 percent get big law...
so you're saying top 1/3 of your class is not "being top percentage" because it definitely is

Ehh not compared to the huge drop off after that. like WUSTL wont even publish their salary numbers but I have a family friend who goes there and says it 's not much they get big law. look at USC http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/usc/sals/2013/ so many of them don't report around 50 percent.... That's because its a such a big drop off.

During the recession except the t16 were affected in terms of consistent results.... I think getting top 35% is hard but again no one says im in top of my class means im in the 65 percentile....

Edit: 35-->65

jumbocolumbo · Post by **jumbocolumbo** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:34 pm

I just had something called a raspberry pillow. Despite sounding like an extremely dirty sexual maneuver, I can confirm it was delicious.

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:34 pm

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:36 pm

Post removed.

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:37 pm

Post removed.

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:37 pm

Seamus887 wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
placeholder wrote:i consider texas and ucla t16 not bc of the money but more the stability in getting big law. i used t16 in the context of seamus saying you need to be top percentage to get big law, and i said you do not if you are going to these 16 law schools because consistently around 35 percent get big law...
so you're saying top 1/3 of your class is not "being top percentage" because it definitely is
Exactly. If I need to beat of 65% of the class for big law, I aint working 20 hours a week in law school.

So when you use the word top percentile you mean anything above 65 percent.... LSAT score 155 is top...

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:40 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
placeholder wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
placeholder wrote:i consider texas and ucla t16 not bc of the money but more the stability in getting big law. i used t16 in the context of seamus saying you need to be top percentage to get big law, and i said you do not if you are going to these 16 law schools because consistently around 35 percent get big law...
so you're saying top 1/3 of your class is not "being top percentage" because it definitely is
Ehh not compared to the huge drop off after that. like WUSTL wont even publish their salary numbers but I have a family friend who goes there and says it 's not much they get big law. look at USC http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/usc/sals/2013/ so many of them don't report around 50 percent.... That's because its a such a big drop off.

During the recession except the t16 were affected in terms of consistent results.... I think getting top 35% is hard but again no one says im in top of my class means im in the 35 percentile....
i'm a bit confused by what you're saying here but WUSTL grads aren't that far behind UCLA/UT grads with big law placement idk why you're relying on salary data to show that when there's big law placement data
http://www.lstscorereports.com/compare/ ... exas/ucla/

b/c quality of job needs to be factored in which means you need to salary as a factor. 110K is their top percentile for big law....

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:40 pm

Post removed.

Generally · Post by **Generally** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:40 pm

Post removed.

NL2424 · Post by **NL2424** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:41 pm

Li'l Sebastian · Post by **Li'l Sebastian** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:42 pm

This is a Waiter's Thread. Err' poast is a shitpoast

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Thu Jun 25, 2015 3:43 pm

i think a great way for me to get my point across is look at USC and UCLA salary numbers and people who report.