The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 4:50 pm

Post removed.

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 4:54 pm

buckiguy_sucks wrote:
EnderWiggin wrote:worth pausing to remember how unrepresentative this group is when compared to the general lsat taking population (tls ppl who sat for the june administration)
please change your tar or I may kill myself

it grows on you. give it time

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:00 pm

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:04 pm

zacboro wrote:Jackel I'm really interested in Duke. I like their programs, location, and other things I've read about them. And I COMPLETELY understand where you're coming from with the "I just wanna see my score so I can start looking at schools." Mylsn puts me at >85% acceptance for Duke with a 170 or higher. Depending on my score I might look into some other schools. You?

I actually haven't looked at Duke too much, but now I'll do more research on them. My main targets are Columbia, NYU, Penn, Berkely and maybe Cornell. Of course if I score high enough for HYS I'll throw apps out. I really just want to get an in-house job but that usually requires big law for a couple years. I just want to put real numbers in mylsn instead of a blanket range to see if I need to adjust my goals.

NL2424 · Post by **NL2424** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:07 pm

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:11 pm

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:13 pm

you guys see spivey's new score band/applicant data for the '14-'15 cycle today? wondering how many falling medians we'll be greeted by come application time

fayvee · Post by **fayvee** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:21 pm

I got LR RC LR LR LG, and I’m *seriously* hoping my first LR was the experimental one. It was my first time taking the test and all the waiting between getting to the test center and actually taking the test (1.5+ hours of sensory deprivation basically – waiting for check-in to start, waiting in line, waiting in the test room for everyone to arrive, at the desk waiting for the test booklets, blah! ) and my brain took a bit to catch on. I was on a serious caffeine low by go-time.

I vaguely remember the first section being longer than the other two, but can’t be sure. It was hard! I had 3-5 questions that I was seriously conflicted on.

The babbling baby was in my second LR so I think that one’s legit and the third LR seemed too easy (finished with extra time to go back). Someone commented elsewhere that the LR experimental was easy though. Fingers crossed!

RC seemed standard, with 2-3 questionable ones. The moral passage was the hardest, but the glass passage took the longest time. There was one question that just did NOT have a right answer.

LG was one of the easiest I had ever done (or so I think!) I finished with 2-3 minutes to spare! The magazine question seemed really easy to me, which means I was TOTALLY off, or I’m one of the people it made sense to? The third question, which I can’t even remember the topic got me more than the other trees or the bonus problem sets, I went back to it to re-do some of the questions. Something with afternoon and morning sessions maybe?

I was testing 167-168 with practice tests from 2001-2009 mainly. The Mauve Dinosaur question made me cry. Thank god there was nothing like that!

hunt godlink · Post by **hunt godlink** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:34 pm

fayvee wrote:I got LR RC LR LR LG, and I’m *seriously* hoping my first LR was the experimental one. It was my first time taking the test and all the waiting between getting to the test center and actually taking the test (1.5+ hours of sensory deprivation basically – waiting for check-in to start, waiting in line, waiting in the test room for everyone to arrive, at the desk waiting for the test booklets, blah! ) and my brain took a bit to catch on. I was on a serious caffeine low by go-time.

The babbling baby was in my second LR so I think that one’s legit and the third LR seemed too easy (finished with extra time to go back). Someone commented elsewhere that the LR experimental was easy though. Fingers crossed!

Is this (3rd LR being the experimental) confirmed..?

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:39 pm

hunt godlink wrote:
fayvee wrote:I got LR RC LR LR LG, and I’m *seriously* hoping my first LR was the experimental one. It was my first time taking the test and all the waiting between getting to the test center and actually taking the test (1.5+ hours of sensory deprivation basically – waiting for check-in to start, waiting in line, waiting in the test room for everyone to arrive, at the desk waiting for the test booklets, blah! ) and my brain took a bit to catch on. I was on a serious caffeine low by go-time.

The babbling baby was in my second LR so I think that one’s legit and the third LR seemed too easy (finished with extra time to go back). Someone commented elsewhere that the LR experimental was easy though. Fingers crossed!
Is this (3rd LR being the experimental) confirmed..?

it's my understanding that just because you had a specific LR third out of 3 total LR sections doesn't mean that was the third LR section for everyone who had an experimental LR.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:41 pm

Post removed.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:44 pm

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:48 pm

Post removed.

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:55 pm

basedvulpes wrote:
buckiguy_sucks wrote:
basedvulpes wrote: I'm T14 or bust too. If I score at the high end of my PT range I'll be hoping for Harvard. As a kid who grew up in a tiny (~500 people) rural New England town I simply can resist the inner desire to tell everyone I know that I made it to HLS.
Need dat lay preftige

Also Jim Harbaugh is a weirdo why would you go to Michigan
Just had to google who Jim Harbaugh is, so that's why.

hope you found that recent shirtless pic of him in all his pasty whiteness
*all hail the har-bod*

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:58 pm

Post removed.

acidwash · Post by **acidwash** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:00 pm

JackelJ wrote:
whacka wrote:Yeah I'm actually curious to know everyone's target schools
To get the ball rolling: I'm T14 or bust

Same. Cornell or Northwestern are my goals. Although lately I've been considering applying to one T20/25 as a back up.

buckiguy_sucks · Post by **buckiguy_sucks** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:01 pm

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:02 pm

Post removed.

NL2424 · Post by **NL2424** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:07 pm

dhb44 · Post by **dhb44** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:08 pm

foles wrote:
dhb44 wrote:
amd3_3 wrote:
zacboro wrote:
dhb44 wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:
peke wrote:Could someone with a non-LR experimental confirm whether or not they saw a very long question that took the entire column - each answer choice was 5-6 lines long (subject regarding a company planning for a March or May conference). I would imagine it's memorable enough many people would be able to recall if they saw it.
I had experimental lr and I don't think I had that question

i believed i did, it was on the left page on the right side...
I believe this was experimental, because it was question 25 and then I had question 26 right next to it. I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure!

Agreed. This was section1 for me, and my format was LR (26) - RC - LR (25) - LR (25) - LG
I must not be talking about the same one because i had two LG sections. First one experimental was hard i probably did a touch better on the second games section.. the rest of the test seemed alright as well i'm hoping for a 160 i dont know tho
Can we get confirmation on whether the LR section with the Q that took up an entire column about planning a conference was experimental or not?

Well again i didn't have an experimental LR so i don't know

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:10 pm

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:12 pm

3.76 is still really good and you can always update law school apps with a new GPA after your fall semester. You get your score back right away for the GRE and GMAT too. Hopefully I'll forget about getting my LSAT score back for 3 weeks

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:14 pm

darthslughorn · Post by **darthslughorn** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:25 pm

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:26 pm

basedvulpes wrote:Just want to throw out that I'm really happy that I no longer feel bad about participating here. I was mostly a lurker while I was studying but I refrained from posting out of puritan guilt that I wasn't nose deep in a prep book instead.

u r actually my alt