Haha yep. I briefly entertained the delusion that I would start by 9:00 am. Definitely did not happen. About to start for real.slizerd wrote:PatriotP74 wrote:Hahaha same here. When I get up at 5 all week long I enjoy a little later on the weekends lolslizerd wrote:Remember how I said I'd wake up at 8? Well, it's now noon. But I swear I'm starting on the PT soon
The Official December 2015 Study Group Forum
- shineoncrazydiamond
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 3:29 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
- PatriotP74
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:17 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by PatriotP74 on Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
- slizerd
- Posts: 2445
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 9:09 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
Mine pays terribly, but it's getting me through a master's degree haha. I figure it's preparing me somewhat for an actual law job though! (gotta find that silver lining somewhere)PatriotP74 wrote:slizerd wrote:Yes haha weekends are too beautiful to be tarnished by alarm clocks. Of course, as soon as I checked my email this morning, I had 3 emails from my boss wanting work done on 3 totally unrelated things that I have to get to before I can take the LSAT -_-PatriotP74 wrote:Hahaha same here. When I get up at 5 all week long I enjoy a little later on the weekends lolslizerd wrote:Remember how I said I'd wake up at 8? Well, it's now noon. But I swear I'm starting on the PT soon
Maybe I'll have it done by 5...
Ouch. I intentionally looked for a job that was all at the office haha when I leave there I have no responsibility after that. Doesn't pay as well I'm sure but reduces stress while I'm stressing over getting into law school haha
I'm planning on starting it here in a half hour or so.
Making it my goal to start with you before the hour is up!
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
Thats what I did. But I knew I'd have to get up at like 5:30, so I 'm not sure why. I think I just got lazy with it. Waking up early when you don't really have to is so hard, lol. If I had a coffee right beside my bed ready I think I'd be goodslizerd wrote:this is a great idea. I'll be your wake-up buddy. I made the mistake last time of waking up at 8ish throughout the week and going to bed at 11ish. This time, I want to go to bed by 9. Waking up at 5 throughout the week should help me be tired enough for that to happen.flash21 wrote:I want to wake up a 5:30 but I need to start doing this on Monday onward until test day. I remember feeling super tired cause I told myself I'd wake up earlier a few weeks in advance but that was determined to be a lieslizerd wrote:I also woke up at 5 last time. I think I'll wake up at the same time again this time, I do much better when I don't feel rushed whatsoever in the morning.Davey Jones wrote:7:15.roshan07 wrote:what time do you all plan on waking up on test day? I woke up at 5:00 last time.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
took up lr after a while today and dropped -5 on 45 LR2. so did another section 39 lr1 and was -0. no idea why i have become inconsistent in lr since oct as i tried to work on rc.
i have done 10 LR sections since oct and misses in the 4th col add to -19. what worries me is the drop of like -5 on some sections.
PT35 4 LR -2 26 Qs
PTC 2 LR -2 24 Qs
PTC 3 LR -1 26 Qs
PT37 2 LR -5 26 Qs
PT37 4 LR -0 25 Qs
PT38 1 LR -0 24 Qs
PT38 4 LR -2 25 Qs
PT45 1 LR -2 25 Qs
PT45 4 LR -5 25 Qs
PT39 2 LR -0 24 Qs
i have done 10 LR sections since oct and misses in the 4th col add to -19. what worries me is the drop of like -5 on some sections.
PT35 4 LR -2 26 Qs
PTC 2 LR -2 24 Qs
PTC 3 LR -1 26 Qs
PT37 2 LR -5 26 Qs
PT37 4 LR -0 25 Qs
PT38 1 LR -0 24 Qs
PT38 4 LR -2 25 Qs
PT45 1 LR -2 25 Qs
PT45 4 LR -5 25 Qs
PT39 2 LR -0 24 Qs
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:10 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by tvu on Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:36 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- jmark1
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
I just scored a 162 on PT 71. Then, almost immediately after, I scored a 171 on PT 59.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, BRAIN.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, BRAIN.
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:10 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
i found 70+ to be much more difficult than 50s/60sjmark1 wrote:I just scored a 162 on PT 71. Then, almost immediately after, I scored a 171 on PT 59.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, BRAIN.
- jmark1
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
I truly, truly bombed the LG section on 71, everything else was pretty similar give or take a few points. Those damn job applicants.cheeseee wrote:i found 70+ to be much more difficult than 50s/60sjmark1 wrote:I just scored a 162 on PT 71. Then, almost immediately after, I scored a 171 on PT 59.
I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU, BRAIN.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
pt 39 lg today at -0
my past 5 LGs haven't been where i want them to be, hoping this continues.
C -1
37 -2
38 -4
45 -0
39 -0
my past 5 LGs haven't been where i want them to be, hoping this continues.
C -1
37 -2
38 -4
45 -0
39 -0
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
wow, 72 is a tough pttvu wrote:Finished after with 2 experimental sections at the beginning ....did not run out of time on any section.
Done with Blind Review, did a few dumb mistakes, but here it is:
Experimental PT 73 Sections
LR -2
LG -4 (WTF?)
PT 72
RC -2/ BR -1
LR -3/ BR -2
LR -2/ BR -2
LG -2/ BR -1
Total 173/ BR 177
Hope I can get on this level on Test Day!
how did you find rc and where did you miss? that lg g4 is different, had you ever seen that before?
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:10 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
tvu wrote:Finished after with 2 experimental sections at the beginning ....did not run out of time on any section.
Done with Blind Review, did a few dumb mistakes, but here it is:
Experimental PT 73 Sections
LR -2
LG -4 (WTF?)
PT 72
RC -2/ BR -1
LR -3/ BR -2
LR -2/ BR -2
LG -2/ BR -1
Total 173/ BR 177
Hope I can get on this level on Test Day!
nice i found the third RC passage difficult - thought i understood it but missed 3 questions + guessed 1
- McJimJam
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:27 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by McJimJam on Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
I hated the last RC passageMcJimJam wrote:Break time from PT 72. RC was rough feel good about the LRs though. 2 sections to go.
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:10 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by tvu on Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:10 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
I missed the same exact RC questions, and more haha. But for 27, I ended up picking A over B too, but the key point, I think, that makes B the correct answer is "not because they are graduated." The author of passage B focuses on how graduated tax is not as unfair as people think. So B's point is that high incomers can avoid because there's the complexity (loopholes + special deductions) within the tax system, and not because they are graduated.tvu wrote:RC was difficult, I was so tempted to change a bunch of answers during BR.appind wrote:
wow, 72 is a tough pt
how did you find rc and where did you miss? that lg g4 is different, had you ever seen that before?
I missed #21 I was down to A or E, chose A at first erased it and then choose E.
Then I missed #27, choose A over B, which I still don't get lol.
For LG, didn't miss any on the last game...idk how though I didn't make many inferences, instead made a stupid mistake on the third game and then on the second didn't have time to answer 12, because I just hate those type of questions.
That 3rd RC passage with the questions was so convoluted and difficult it took me a bit over 11 minutes, completely hated the whole RC section.cheeseee wrote:
nice i found the third RC passage difficult - thought i understood it but missed 3 questions + guessed 1
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:10 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
Can anyone help me with PT 72-2-16 about great artworks? I understand why D is the right answer because it points the gap about accessibility and therefore we're not at maximum yet. But I don't understand why E is wrong. Doesn't the argument assume that the number of artworks in the world do affect our fulfillment?
Thanks
Thanks
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- McJimJam
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:27 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by McJimJam on Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
yeah that 3rd passage was a bear. how are you finishing 3 passages in 23 mins? can you describe your approach?tvu wrote:That 3rd RC passage with the questions was so convoluted and difficult it took me a bit over 11 minutes, completely hated the whole RC section.cheeseee wrote:
nice i found the third RC passage difficult - thought i understood it but missed 3 questions + guessed 1
- McJimJam
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:27 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by McJimJam on Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- seashell.economy
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 10:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
Do people actually use the LR Bible's Assumption Negation Technique?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- McJimJam
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:27 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by McJimJam on Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- McJimJam
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:27 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by McJimJam on Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PatriotP74
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:17 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by PatriotP74 on Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official December 2015 Study Group
Just finished reviewing PT 67.
LR (-3)
RC (-5)
LG (-4) ...missed the first question somehow...
LR (-0)!!!
169. (RC seemed a bit hard this one)
Very happy with LR, though I need to shape up RC and ESPECIALLY LG.
LR (-3)
RC (-5)
LG (-4) ...missed the first question somehow...
LR (-0)!!!
169. (RC seemed a bit hard this one)
Very happy with LR, though I need to shape up RC and ESPECIALLY LG.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login