subsidiary conclusion (June 2007) Section 2, Question 7

BillsFan9907
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

subsidiary conclusion (June 2007) Section 2, Question 7

Postby BillsFan9907 » Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:59 am

As this is the freely distributed LSAT (June 2007), I will post the question here:

Economist: Every business strives to increase its
productivity, for this increases profits for the
owners and the likelihood that the business will
survive. But not all efforts to increase
productivity are beneficial to the business as a
whole. Often, attempts to increase productivity
decrease the number of employees, which clearly
harms the dismissed employees as well as the
sense of security of the retained employees.


Is the bolded a subsidiary conclusion?

User avatar
Clyde Frog
Posts: 7086
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:27 am

Re: subsidiary conclusion (June 2007) Section 2, Question 7

Postby Clyde Frog » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:12 pm

Yeah.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw, Deardevil, Hi-So - ArshavinFan, sethnoorzad, Walliums and 15 guests